Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of Episodic Memory
Open accessAbstract
Functional MRI (fMRI) studies investigating the neural basis of episodic memory recall, and the related task of thinking about plausible personal future events, have revealed a consistent network of associated brain regions. Surprisingly little, however, is understood about the contributions individual brain areas make to the overall recollective experience. To examine this, we used a novel fMRI paradigm in which subjects had to imagine fictitious experiences. In contrast to future thinking, this results in experiences that are not explicitly temporal in nature or as reliant on self-processing. By using previously imagined fictitious experiences as a comparison for episodic memories, we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction, involving the generation, maintenance and visualization of complex spatial contexts. This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex. Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus. These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes, and contribute to the brain's ability to distinguish real from imaginary memories. We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences, and suggest it may partially account for the similar brain networks implicated in navigation, episodic future thinking, and the default mode. We suggest that additional brain regions are co-opted into this core network in a task-specific manner to support functions such as episodic memory that may have additional requirements.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
4 of 17 cited sources checked · 1 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Background
The paper says episodic memory can be divided into component processes such as subjective time, self-processing, imagery, semantic retrieval, multimodal detail, and familiarity.
“Thus episodic memory recall can be conceptually divided into a number of component processes including a sense of subjective time (Tulving, 2002), self-processing (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multi-modal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 3 sources checked - Background
The introduction notes that prior fMRI studies of episodic recall and future thinking have found a consistent distributed set of brain regions.
“have revealed a consistent and distributed network of associated brain regions,”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified1 of 3 sources checked- cites Maguire, 2001 source
- cites Svoboda et al., 2006 source
Section 3.1 identifies a consistent, distributed network across autobiographical-memory imaging studies. Section 3.4 reports overlap in two regions for past and future thought, but cites only one imaging study directly comparing them; it does not establish a consistent distributed network across studies of both episodic recall and future thinking. The indexed copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007 source
- Finding
The recall of real memories activated the classic episodic memory network relative to recalled objects.
“we replicated the well-established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified2 of 3 sources checked- cites Maguire, 2001 source
- cites Rugg et al., 2002 source
The Abstract (page unavailable) reports that successful episodic recollection is associated with lateral parietal activation and more variable prefrontal activation. It does not establish a consistently activated network in autobiographical-memory studies or compare recall of real memories with recall of objects; the available text points to a PDF for the full article. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites Svoboda et al., 2006 source
The Introduction says the meta-analysis identifies shared patterns of brain activation during autobiographical remembering, supporting the citing sentence’s reference to an established retrieval network. The Results and discussion (section 3.1) also describes an autobiographical-memory network. Our copy does not establish the claim’s more specific comparison of real-memory recall with recalled objects. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Finding
The paper claims that anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, and precuneus show responses specific to episodic memory.
“Importantly, we disambiguated these common effects from episodic memory-specific responses in anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex and precuneus.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
It suggests that those episodic-memory-specific regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes.
“These latter regions may support self-schema and familiarity processes,”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified
- Finding
The authors conclude that scene construction is a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences.
“We conclude that scene construction constitutes a common process underlying episodic memory and imagination of fictitious experiences,”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
The paper argues that scene construction is a shared core process in episodic memory and imagined fictitious experience.
“we identified the neural basis of a key process engaged in common, namely scene construction”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
The study says that the shared scene-construction network includes hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.
“This was associated with activations in a distributed network, including hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, and retrosplenial cortex.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
It reports that this shared process involves generation, maintenance, and visualization of complex spatial contexts.
“involving the generation, maintenance and visualisation of complex spatial contexts.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
The authors say imagining new experiences is a useful experimental tool for studying episodic memory and related cognitive functions.
“This study demonstrates that imagining new experiences is a manipulable and useful experimental tool which may prove fruitful in further advancing our understanding of episodic memory and the processes underpinning it, as well as other related cognitive functions”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- cites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Finding
The paper concludes that the distributed network supports scene construction and that additional regions are recruited in a task-specific way for episodic memory.
“We further propose that the recruitment of this network in a variety of different conditions (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007), ranging from the default state, spatial navigation to episodic future thinking, may in fact reflect its general role in the process of scene construction.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 2 sources checked- cites Buckner and Carroll, 2007 source
- cites Hassabis and Maguire, 2007
Couldn’t be matched to a paper in Crossref, so it can’t be checked.
- Finding
The reverse comparison found no areas with higher activity for previously imagined memories than for real memories.
“No changes in activity were observed in the reverse contrast [(IS − IO) > (RM − RO)].”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
A conjunction analysis showed a common scene-construction network across real memories, previously imagined scenes, and newly imagined scenes.
“A conjunction analysis (Friston et al., 2005) of the main conditions (RM, IS, NS) against their respective controls (RO, IO, NO) allowed us to isolate the common brain network involved in the underlying core process of constructing, maintaining and visualising complex scenes.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 1 sources checked- cites Friston et al., 2005 source
- Finding
Real memories were rated as more coherent, easier, more vivid, and more memory-like than recalled objects.
“RM was rated as easier, more vivid and more like a real memory than the pictures of objects seen in the interview session (RO)”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
During scanning, the conditions were generally well matched on ratings such as difficulty, vividness, coherence, and memory.
“Overall the conditions were generally very well-matched (see Table 2).”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
Real memories were associated with a stronger sense of presence than imagined scenes.
“As expected, real memories were associated with a stronger sense of presence than imagined scenes whether recalled or newly created in the scanner”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
That common network included bilateral hippocampi, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, precuneus, posterior parietal cortex, and vmPFC.
“This network (see Table 6 and Figure 3) included bilateral hippocampi, parahippocampal gyrus, retrospenial cortex, precuneus, posterior parietal cortex and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC).”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
Compared with previously imagined memories, real memories preferentially engaged precuneus, posterior cingulate cortex, and anterior medial prefrontal cortex.
“The precuneus, PCC and anterior medial prefrontal (amPFC; BA 10) were preferentially engaged for real compared to imagined memories”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Finding
Newly imagined scenes activated a network that included the right hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, and posterior parietal cortex.
“including the right hippocampus, PHG, retrosplenial and posterior parietal cortices.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Background
The introduction states that episodic recollection is usually treated as a reconstructive process rather than a perfect replay.
“Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified0 of 3 sources checked - Method
The scan used T2*-weighted EPI BOLD images on a 1.5 tesla Siemens Sonata MRI scanner.
“T2*-weighted echo planar (EPI) images with blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) contrast were acquired on a 1.5 tesla Siemens AG (Erlangen, Germany) Sonata MRI scanner.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
After scanning, participants were debriefed and scored on memory, detail, emotion, and sense of presence for the visualized scenes.
“After scanning, subjects were thoroughly debriefed.”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The study included 21 healthy right-handed native English speakers.
“Twenty one healthy, right-handed, native English speakers participated in the experiment”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified - Method
The experiment used text cues identifying recall, recreate, imagine, and focus trial types.
“Each cue started with a keyword indicating the trial type followed by a very brief description of the scene or object to be visualised. Four keywords were used: ‘Recall’”
Quote in the paperNot yet classified
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is striking overlap among brain regions involved in retrieval of autobiographical memories, imagination of novel events, and navigation.
“Much recent interest has focused on the striking overlap among brain regions involved in the retrieval of autobiographical memories, the imagination of novel events, and navigation14, 47, 48.”
From Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe (2014) · cites this paper as [48]
Statistics recomputed
Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.
- Consistentt(20) = 13.52reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.52, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 13.6reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 13.60, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.03reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.03, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.89reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.89, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.36reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.36, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.41reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.41, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.88reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .009
“t(20) = 2.88, p < .01”
- Consistentt(20) = -4.77reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −4.77, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -6.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = −6.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 5.51reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 5.51, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.96reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.96, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 6.17reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 6.17, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 17.85reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 17.85, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 11.18reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 11.18, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 2.42reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .025
“t(20) = 2.42, p < .03”
- Consistentt(20) = 12.99reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 12.99, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 8.67reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 8.67, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.89reported p = .39 · recomputed p = .384
“t(20) = −0.89, p = .39”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.51reported p = .62 · recomputed p = .616
“t(20) = 0.51, p = .62”
- Consistentt(20) = -1.97reported p = .06 · recomputed p = .063
“t(20) = −1.97, p = .06”
- Consistentt(20) = -1reported p = .33 · recomputed p = .329
“t(20) = −1.00, p = .33”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.47reported p = .64 · recomputed p = .643
“t(20) = −0.47, p = .64”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.75reported p = .1 · recomputed p = .095
“t(20) = 1.75, p = .10”
- Consistentt(20) = 3.86reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 3.86, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 4.26reported p < .001 · recomputed p < .001
“t(20) = 4.26, p < .001”
- Consistentt(20) = 1.09reported p = .29 · recomputed p = .289
“t(20) = 1.09, p = .29”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.69reported p = .5 · recomputed p = .498
“t(20) = −0.69, p = .50”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.59reported p = .56 · recomputed p = .562
“t(20) = −0.59, p = .56”
- Consistentt(20) = 0.26reported p = .8 · recomputed p = .798
“t(20) = 0.26, p = .80”
- Consistentt(20) = -0.3reported p = .77 · recomputed p = .767
“t(20) = −0.30, p = .77”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.
Cites
A default mode of brain function
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., & Shulman, G. L. (2001) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.98.2.676 · Cited by 12,190 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007), leading to suggestions that it performs a general function (Buckner and Carroll, 2007;…”
BackgroundInfluential(1978) · UA Campus Repository (The University of Arizona) · Cited by 8,010 · see citing works
Episodic memory: from mind to brain
Tulving, E. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135114 · Cited by 4,950 · cited 11× · see citing works
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system
Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.261 · Cited by 4,089 · cited 7× · see citing works
“…a purely created imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMeeting of minds: the medial frontal cortex and social cognition
Amodio, D. M., & Frith, C. D. (2006) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn1884 · Cited by 3,782 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related…”
BackgroundPhilosophical conceptions of the self: implications for cognitive science.
Gallagher, S. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(99)01417-5 · Cited by 2,881 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Moreover, by using rich imaginary memories as a well matched comparison task we were able to isolate processes specific to episodic memory, such as the use of self-schema (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000), a sense of familiarity and mental time travel (Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWandering minds: the default network and stimulus-independent thought
Mason, M. F., Norton, M. I., Van Horn, J. D., Wegner, D. M., Grafton, S. T., & Macrae, C. N. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1131295 · Cited by 2,792 · cited 4× · see citing works
“, 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialBuckner, R. L., & Carroll, D. C. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.004 · Cited by 2,691 · see citing works
The human hippocampus and spatial and episodic memory
Burgess, N., Maguire, E. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2002) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(02)00830-9 · Cited by 2,401 · cited 3× · see citing works
“…network (also replicated in this study with the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic…”
BackgroundMethodSelf-citationRemembering the past to imagine the future: the prospective brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., & Buckner, R. L. (2007) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2213 · Cited by 2,394 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…a key component of episodic memory recall lends additional support to constructive theories of episodic memory (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998) and the recently proposed constructive episodic simulation function of the episodic memory system (Schacter and Addis, 2007; Schacter et al., 2007).”
BackgroundDevelopment and neurophysiology of mentalizing
Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2003) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1218 · Cited by 2,306 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…cognitive functions including future thinking (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), spatial navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003), theory of mind (Frith and Frith, 2003), the default network (Raichle et al., 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et al., 2007).”
BackgroundAddis, D. R., Wong, A. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2007) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.10.016 · Cited by 1,949 · cited 11× · see citing works
“By using imagining fictitious experiences as a comparison task for episodic memory, it is possible to address some key questions not amenable to previous studies (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialKosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090055 · Cited by 1,894 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…control conditions involving the vivid visualization of acontextual objects which allowed us to distinguish between the processes of “simple” imagery (Kosslyn et al., 2001) (e.g., of objects), and that of complex scene construction and visualization, and attribute the latter to a distributed…”
BackgroundThe cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory: remembering the past and imagining the future
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2087 · Cited by 1,836 · cited 8× · see citing works
“Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007) as opposed to the simple retrieval of a perfect holistic record.”
BackgroundInfluentialToward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness.
Wheeler, M. A., Stuss, D. T., & Tulving, E. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.331 · Cited by 1,751 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the amPFC and PCC might be supporting pro- cesses related to the self (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000) and mental time travel (Wheeler et al., 1997; Tulving, 2002).”
BackgroundInfluentialFrackowiak, R. S. J. (1997) · Cited by 1,713 · see citing works
Parietal lobe contributions to episodic memory retrieval
Wagner, A. D., Shannon, B. J., Kahn, I., & Buckner, R. L. (2005) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.001 · Cited by 1,571 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
BackgroundInfluentialEichenbaum (2004) · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2004.08.028 · Cited by 1,464 · see citing works
Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Vann, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610561104 · Cited by 1,414 · cited 15× · see citing works
“as the hippocampus (Hassabis et al., 2007) not thought to be”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationAtance, C. M., & O'Neill, D. K. (2001) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01804-0 · Cited by 1,300 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), the default mode (Raichle et al., 2001) and…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialThe functional neuroanatomy of autobiographical memory: a meta-analysis
Svoboda, E., McKinnon, M. C., & Levine, B. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.023 · Cited by 1,274 · cited 8× · see citing works
“By contrasting the recall of recent episodic memories to the recall of acontextual objects previously seen in the interview session (RM RO) we replicated the well established episodic memory retrieval network consistently activated in studies of autobiographical memory (Maguire, 2001; Rugg et al., 2002; Svoboda et al.…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialDeconstructing episodic memory with construction
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.001 · Cited by 1,229 · cited 15× · see citing works
“Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007) as opposed to the simple retrieval of a perfect holistic record.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationCoherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network
Vincent, J. L., Snyder, A. Z., Fox, M. D., Shannon, B. J., Andrews, J. R., Raichle, M. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2006) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00048.2006 · Cited by 959 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
BackgroundNeural correlates of self-reflection
Johnson, S. C. (2002) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/awf181 · Cited by 930 · cited 1× · see citing works
“In fact the pattern of activation revealed by this contrast bears a striking resemblance to networks found to support self-reflection (Johnson et al., 2002), theory of mind (Kumaran and Maguire, 2005; Amodio and Frith, 2006) and episodic future thinking (Addis et al., 2007) suggesting that the…”
ResultMoscovitch, M., Rosenbaum, R. S., Gilboa, A., Addis, D. R., Westmacott, R., Grady, C., McAndrews, M. P., Levine, B., Black, S., Winocur, G., et al. (2005) · Journal of Anatomy · doi:10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00421.x · Cited by 893 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Their descriptions were fragmented, lacked a coherent spatial context, and were significantly less rich suggesting that the hippocampus plays a critical role in integrating the disparate elements of a scene into a coherent whole (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Burgess et al., 2001; Eichenbaum, 2004; Moscovitch et al., 2005;…”
BackgroundMemory's echo: vivid remembering reactivates sensory-specific cortex
Wheeler, M. E., Petersen, S. E., & Buckner, R. L. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.97.20.11125 · Cited by 865 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…(Conway and PleydellPearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multimodal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
BackgroundSpatial memory: how egocentric and allocentric combine
Burgess, N. (2006) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.10.005 · Cited by 827 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…imagined experience does not have the same reliance or effect on the imaginer’s self-schema compared with a real episodic memory (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Gallagher, 2000) although both likely involve the adoption of an egocentric viewpoint (Burgess, 2006) on the part of the imaginer.”
BackgroundTHE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY
Schacter, D. L., Norman, K. A., & Koutstaal, W. (1998) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.289 · Cited by 827 · cited 4× · see citing works
“…reconstructed along very similar lines to the way imagined events are constructed, dovetailing with the idea that memory is (re)constructive in nature (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe Well-Worn Route and the Path Less Traveled
Hartley, T., Maguire, E. A., Spiers, H. J., & Burgess, N. (2003) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00095-3 · Cited by 817 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…other high-level cognitive functions including future thinking (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007), spatial navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003), theory of mind (Frith and Frith, 2003), the default network (Raichle et al., 2001), and perhaps even daydreaming (Mason et…”
BackgroundSelf-citationNeural substrates of envisioning the future
Szpunar, K. K., Watson, J. M., & McDermott, K. B. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0610082104 · Cited by 784 · cited 14× · see citing works
“By using imagining fictitious experiences as a comparison task for episodic memory, it is possible to address some key questions not amenable to previous studies (Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultInfluentialFunctional neuroimaging of autobiographical memory
Cabeza, R., & St Jacques, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.02.005 · Cited by 736 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Using Imagination to Understand the Neural Basis of”
MethodBelief and recollection of autobiographical memories
Rubin, D. C., Schrauf, R. W., & Greenberg, D. L. (2003) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/bf03196443 · Cited by 612 · cited 9× · see citing works
“Recollection of this type of memory is widely accepted to be a reconstructive process (Bartlett, 1932; Schacter et al., 1998; Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Rubin et al., 2003; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007) as opposed to the simple retrieval of a perfect holistic record.”
BackgroundInfluentialFriston, K. J., Penny, W. D., & Glaser, D. E. (2005) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.013 · Cited by 578 · cited 2× · see citing works
“A standard conjunction analysis (Friston et al., 2005), as implemented in SPM5 and reported at p 0.001, was performed to reveal the regions activated in common between the main scene conditions compared with their respective individual baseline object conditions.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialNeuroimaging studies of autobiographical event memory
Maguire, E. A. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0944 · Cited by 513 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…present study advances efforts to dissociate the functions of the many brain regions consistently activated in studies of episodic memory recall (Maguire, 2001; Svoboda et al., 2006; Cabeza and St Jacques, 2007) and episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Szpunar…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationMemory for events and their spatial context: models and experiments
Burgess, N., Becker, S., King, J. A., & O'Keefe, J. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0948 · Cited by 377 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Their descriptions were fragmented, lacked a coherent spatial context, and were significantly less rich suggesting that the hippocampus plays a critical role in integrating the disparate elements of a scene into a coherent whole (O’Keefe and Nadel, 1978; Burgess et al., 2001; Eichenbaum, 2004; Moscovitch et al., 2005;…”
BackgroundThoughts, behaviour, and brain dynamics during navigation in the real world
Spiers, H. J., & Maguire, E. A. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.01.037 · Cited by 371 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…the RM RO contrast) has also been activated in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis…”
BackgroundSelf-citationRoutes to remembering: the brains behind superior memory
Maguire, E. A., Valentine, E. R., Wilding, J. M., & Kapur, N. (2002) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn988 · Cited by 370 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…in a variety of other circumstances including navigation (Burgess et al., 2002; Hartley et al., 2003; Spiers and Maguire, 2006), spatial tasks (Maguire et al., 2003; Kumaran and Maguire, 2005), episodic future thinking (Atance and O’Neill, 2001; Addis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationThe neural basis of episodic memory: evidence from functional neuroimaging
Rugg, M. D., Otten, L. J., & Henson, R. N. A. (2002) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1102 · Cited by 326 · cited 5× · see citing works
“…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialThe Neuropsychology of autobiographical memory
GREENBERG, D., & RUBIN, D. (2003) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(08)70860-8 · Cited by 318 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…and imagining fictitious experiences share striking similarities in terms of the psychological processes engaged (Conway and Pleydell-Pearce, 2000; Greenberg and Rubin, 2003; Schacter and Addis, 2007) including imagery (Rubin et al., 2003) and the retrieval of relevant semantic information…”
BackgroundGottfried, J. A., Smith, A. P. R., Rugg, M. D., & Dolan, R. J. (2004) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/s0896-6273(04)00270-3 · Cited by 261 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…(Conway and PleydellPearce, 2000), visual imagery (Rubin et al., 2003), narrative structure (Rubin et al., 2003), retrieval of semantic information (Wheeler et al., 1997) and multimodal details (Wheeler et al., 2000; Gottfried et al., 2004), and feelings of familiarity (Wagner et al., 2005).”
BackgroundThe Human Hippocampus: Cognitive Maps or Relational Memory?
Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2005) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1103-05.2005 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationSugiura, M., Shah, N. J., Zilles, K., & Fink, G. R. (2005) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/0898929053124956 · Cited by 167 · cited 5× · see citing works
“This is strikingly consistent with other studies that have investigated objects compared with places (Sugiura et al., 2005), and has been attributed to greater attention and focus being directed toward the object when present in isolation (Sugiura et al.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialNeurophysiological correlates of memory for experienced and imagined events
Conway, M. A., Pleydell-Pearce, C. W., Whitecross, S. E., & Sharpe, H. (2003) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/s0028-3932(02)00165-3 · Cited by 156 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Moreover, evidence from a previous EEG study (Conway et al., 2003) also suggests that common processes underlie the recall of both real and imaginary events.”
BackgroundRosenbaum, R. S., McKinnon, M. C., Levine, B., & Moscovitch, M. (2004) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.04.010 · Cited by 72 · cited 2× · see citing works
“As such, scene construction likely recruits a set of additional processes underpinned by regions such as the hippocampus (Hassabis et al., 2007) not thought to be involved in simple imagery (Rosenbaum et al., 2004).”
BackgroundMethodfMRI correlates of retrieval orientation
HORNBERGER, M., RUGG, M., & HENSON, R. (2006) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.12.009 · Cited by 54 · cited 2× · see citing works
“…not surprisingly given their often highly familiar content, more familiar than imaginary memories, in line with proposals concerning the function of this region derived from studies of recognition memory (Rugg et al., 2002; Wagner et al., 2005; Hornberger et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006).”
Background
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Bartlett FC (1932) Remembering (Cambridge UP, Cambridge).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
<i>The Brain's Default Network</i>: <i>Anatomy, Function, and Relevance to Disease</i>
Buckner, R. L., Andrews‐Hanna, J. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1196/annals.1440.011 · Cited by 9,761 · see citing works
“They refer to this process as “scene construction,” a term emphasizing that mental simulation often un-folds in one’s mind as an imagined scene with rich visual and spatial content (see also Hassabis et al. 2007).”
BackgroundBinder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060 · see citing works
Functional-anatomic fractionation of the brain’s default network
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Reidler, J. S., Sepulcre, J., Poulin, R., & Buckner, R. L. (2010) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.02.005 · Cited by 2,767 · see citing works
“Consistent with this finding, patients with hippocampal amnesia lack the ability to imagine a coherent scene presumably void of a temporal context (Hassabis et al., 2007b; see also Hassabis et al., 2007a; Addis et al., 2009).”
Spreng, R. N., Mar, R. A., & Kim, A. S. N. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2008.21029 · Cited by 2,143 · see citing works
Hippocampal sharp wave-ripple: A cognitive biomarker for episodic memory and planning
Buzsáki, G. (2015) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22488 · Cited by 1,759 · see citing works
Daselaar, S. M. (2009) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/neuro.09.013.2009 · Cited by 1,501 · see citing works
“The default network is active during a variety of internally-oriented task conditions, including thinking about the future (Szpunar et al., 2007), self-referential processing (Kelley et al., 2002), and visual imagery ( Hassabis et al., 2007 ).”
Mind-wandering as spontaneous thought: a dynamic framework
Christoff, K., Irving, Z. C., Fox, K. C. R., Spreng, R. N., & Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2016.113 · Cited by 1,376 · see citing works
The future of memory: remembering, imagining, and the brain
Schacter, D. L., Addis, D. R., Hassabis, D., Martin, V. C., Spreng, R. N., & Szpunar, K. K. (2012) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2012.11.001 · Cited by 1,398 · see citing works
“For example, in a study that used the Autobiographical Interview as well as measures of scene construction based on prior work by Hassabis et al. (2007b), Squire et al. (2010) reported that amnesic patients with damage to the hippocampus showed an intact ability to create detailed imaginary future…”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialSelf-citationWhat does the retrosplenial cortex do?
Vann, S. D., Aggleton, J. P., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2733 · Cited by 1,409 · see citing works
Self-citationThe hippocampus and memory: insights from spatial processing
Bird, C. M., & Burgess, N. (2008) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn2335 · Cited by 1,313 · see citing works
“A functional-imaging study of this task in healthy adults showed that the hippocampus was activated during the period of imaginatio”
BackgroundThe brain's default network and its adaptive role in internal mentation
Andrews-Hanna, J. R. (2012) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858411403316 · Cited by 1,114 · see citing works
Spreng, R. N., & Grady, C. L. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21282 · Cited by 985 · see citing works
“Notably, there was also substantial involvement of the hippocampal formation for autobiographical memory and prospection: This may be due to the temporal extension of the self and greater recombination of contextualized event details involved in remembering and prospection (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ; Schacte…”
BackgroundParahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation
Epstein, R. A. (2008) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.004 · Cited by 911 · see citing works
The human imagination: the cognitive neuroscience of visual mental imagery
Pearson, J. (2019) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-019-0202-9 · Cited by 820 · see citing works
Emotion and the prefrontal cortex: an integrative review
Dixon, M. L., Thiruchselvam, R., Todd, R., & Christoff, K. (2017) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000096 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
“The network to which it belongs has been linked to scene construction (AndrewsHanna, Reidler, Huang, et al., 2010; Hassabis et al., 2007) and the spontaneous generation of thoughts (Christoff et al.”
BackgroundSchilbach, L., Eickhoff, S. B., Rotarska-Jagiela, A., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2008) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.013 · Cited by 615 · see citing works
Szpunar, K. K. (2010) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691610362350 · Cited by 624 · see citing works
Evaluative and generative modes of thought during the creative process
Ellamil, M., Dobson, C., Beeman, M., & Christoff, K. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.08.008 · Cited by 611 · see citing works
“Consistent with this, imagining novel, fictitious scenes activates the sameMTL regions as future event simulation (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundInfluentialAddis, D. R., Pan, L., Vu, M.-A. T., Laiser, N., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.026 · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Anterior hippocampus: the anatomy of perception, imagination and episodic memory
Zeidman, P., & Maguire, E. A. (2016) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn.2015.24 · Cited by 542 · see citing works
Self-citationPlace Cells, Grid Cells, and MemoryPreprint
Moser, M., Rowland, D. C., & Moser, E. I. (2015) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a021808 · Cited by 538 · see citing works
“Studies in human subjects show that overlapping hippocampal networks are activated during episodic recall and imagination of fictitious experiences (Hassabis et al. 2007).”
BackgroundEmotion and autobiographical memory
Holland, A. C., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010) · Physics of Life Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.plrev.2010.01.006 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
“It is still debated what these more general abilities may be: they could include selfreferential processing [50], cognitive–affective simulation of possible outcomes [233], mind-wandering [237] or the (re)construction of spatial contexts [154].”
Sestieri, C., Corbetta, M., Romani, G. L., & Shulman, G. L. (2011) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.3335-10.2011 · Cited by 523 · see citing works
“…functional networks for the processing of environmental stimuli, the apparent functional homogeneity of the DMN during environmentally directed tasks (Shulman et al., 1997; Mazoyer et al., 2001) breaks down in tasks that isolate specific internally directed processes (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundThe construction system of the brain
Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. A. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0296 · Cited by 483 · see citing works
Self-citationThe role of the hippocampus in flexible cognition and social behavior
Rubin, R. D., Watson, P. D., Duff, M. C., & Cohen, N. J. (2014) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00742 · Cited by 489 · see citing works
“The contribution of the hippocampus to spatial information and navigation has an extensive basis in the literature stemming from early evidence of location-modulated cells in the rodent hippocampus (for review, see Burgess et al., 2002).”
The hippocampal sharp wave-ripple in memory retrieval for immediate use and consolidation
Joo, H. R., & Frank, L. M. (2018) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/s41583-018-0077-1 · Cited by 430 · see citing works
Social cognition and the cerebellum: A meta-analysis of over 350 fMRI studies
Overwalle, F. V., Baetens, K., Mariën, P., & Vandekerckhove, M. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.09.033 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Imagining predictions: mental imagery as mental emulation
Moulton, S. T., & Kosslyn, S. M. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0314 · Cited by 421 · see citing works
Adaptive constructive processes and the future of memory
Schacter, D. L. (2012) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/a0029869 · Cited by 417 · see citing works
“Instead, they represent imaginary scenes or scenarios that might or might not occur to the individual within a particular future time frame (e.g., Addis et al., 2007; Addis, Pan, et al., 2009; Hassabis et al., 2007; Okuda et al., 2003; Spreng & Grady, 2010; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMinds made for sharing: initiating joint attention recruits reward-related neurocircuitry
Schilbach, L., Wilms, M., Eickhoff, S. B., Romanzetti, S., Tepest, R., Bente, G., Shah, N. J., Fink, G. R., & Vogeley, K. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21401 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
“Such self-generated information may also result from activity in retrosplenial cortex, known to be involved in episodic memory (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ), as well as the anterior temporal pole, previously associated with socioemotional knowledge (Zahn et al, 2007 ), also observed for the main effect of JA.”
BackgroundConsidering the role of semantic memory in episodic future thinking: evidence from semantic dementia
Irish, M., Addis, D. R., Hodges, J. R., & Piguet, O. (2012) · Brain · doi:10.1093/brain/aws119 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
“…to remember the past is compromised, such as mild cognitive impairment (Gamboz et al., 2010), mild Alzheimer's disease (Addis et al., 2009b), amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage (Tulving, 1985; Hassabis et al., 2007b; Race et al., 2011) and developmental amnesia (Kwan et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe hippocampus: a manifesto for change
Maguire, E. A., & Mullally, S. L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0033650 · Cited by 393 · see citing works
Self-citationEvent memory: A theory of memory for laboratory, autobiographical, and fictional events.
Rubin, D. C., & Umanath, S. (2015) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0037907 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
Ranganath, C. (2010) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20852 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
“MODELS IN THIS SPECIAL ISSUE Because BIC is a framework that attempts to explain MTL function across different levels of analysis and research domains, the model shares many features with other models that have been proposed.”
BackgroundMethodRostral and caudal prefrontal contribution to creativity: a meta-analysis of functional imaging data
Gonen-Yaacovi, G., de Souza, L. C., Levy, R., Urbanski, M., Josse, G., & Volle, E. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00465 · Cited by 376 · see citing works
“…also been associated with counterfactual thinking (Gomez Beldarrain et al., 2005; Van Hoeck et al., 2013), prospective memory and future thinking (Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007; Abraham et al., 2008; Addis et al., 2009; Szpunar et al., 2009; Burgess et al., 2011; Volle et al.,…”
Benoit, R. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2015) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.06.034 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
“…the finding that the pattern of brain activation associated with the retrieval of autobiographical memories closely resembles the pattern associated with the simulation of future or fictitious episodes (e.g., Addis et al., 2007; Botzung et al., 2008; Hassabis et al., 2007b; Szpunar et al., 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialMental time travel and the shaping of the human mind
Suddendorf, T., Addis, D. R., & Corballis, M. C. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0301 · Cited by 379 · see citing works
The Pivotal Role of Semantic Memory in Remembering the Past and Imagining the Future
Irish, M., & Piguet, O. (2013) · Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00027 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
“…a dramatic surge of research activity within the last few years, with growing evidence in favor of a link between remembering the past, imagining the future, and engaging in mental simulation processes (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2012).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe fallacy of a “task‐negative” network
Spreng, R. N. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00145 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
“…or imagining one’s personal future (Andreasen et al., 1995; Schacter et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009), scene construction (Hassabis and Maguire, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007), social cognition (Iacoboni et al., 2004; Spreng et al., 2009; Spreng and Grady, 2010; Mar, 2011; Andrews-Hanna, in…”
BackgroundZhou, Y., Dougherty, J. H., Hübner, K. F., Bai, B., Cannon, R. L., & Hutson, R. K. (2008) · Alzheimer s & Dementia · doi:10.1016/j.jalz.2008.04.006 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Race, E., Keane, M. M., & Verfaellie, M. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.1145-11.2011 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
“Such investigations would also address the possibility that future-thinking deficits in amnesia reflect impairments in self-projection (Buckner and Carroll, 2007; but see Hassabis et al., 2007b).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialWhy do we remember? The communicative function of episodic memory
Mahr, J. B., & Csibra, G. (2017) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x17000012 · Cited by 339 · see citing works
“…example, as mentioned by M&C, the two capacities are supported by the same core network of brain regions (Addis et al. 2007; Benoit & Schacter 2015; Hassabis et al. 2007a; Szpunar et al. 2007), are similarly deficient in amnesic patients (Hassabis et al. 2007b; Klein et al. 2002b; Race et al.…”
InfluentialConcept representation reflects multimodal abstraction: A framework for embodied semantics
Fernandino, L., Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Pendl, S. L., Humphries, C. J., Gross, W. L., Conant, L. L., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2016) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhv020 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
“…including general semantic processing (Binder et al. 2009), mental scene construction and visuo-spatial imagery (Cavanna and Trimble 2006; Hassabis et al. 2007; Schacter and Addis 2009; Spreng et al. 2009), self-referential processing (Gusnard et al. 2001), and autobiographical memory…”
BackgroundAndrews-Hanna, J. R., Saxe, R., & Yarkoni, T. (2014) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.01.032 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
“, 2009; Seghier and Price, 2012), as well as when individuals simulate novel scenes (Hassabis et al., 2007) and imagine their autobiographical future (Addis et al.”
BackgroundKim, H. (2010) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.051 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
“Though many researchers have suggested there is a close relationship between remembering and the defaultmode network (Vincent et al., 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Schacter and Addis, 2007), our findings indicate that the association is largely restricted to remembering that significantly involves self-referential”
BackgroundEpisodic simulation of future events is impaired in mild Alzheimer's disease
Addis, D. R., Sacchetti, D. C., Ally, B. A., Budson, A. E., & Schacter, D. L. (2009) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.05.018 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe
Marchette, S. A., Vass, L. K., Ryan, J., & Epstein, R. A. (2014) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3834 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Online evaluation of novel choices by simultaneous representation of multiple memories
Barron, H. C., Dolan, R. J., & Behrens, T. E. J. (2013) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3515 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
Inductive biases for deep learning of higher-level cognition
Goyal, A., & Bengio, Y. (2022) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0068 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
“Neuroscientists have also accumulated evidence that the hippocampus is involved in replaying sequences (from memory or imagination) for consolidation into cortex [212,213] so that they can be presumably committed to cortical long-term memory and fast inference.”
BackgroundZadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2016) · doi:10.1101/081208 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
The hippocampus and inferential reasoning: building memories to navigate future decisions
Zeithamova, D., Schlichting, M. L., & Preston, A. R. (2012) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00070 · Cited by 266 · see citing works
“…(Barense et al., 2005; Lee et al., 2005a,b; Barense et al., 2007; Bussey and Saksida, 2007; Lee et al., 2012), and even short-term planning and imagining of future events (Addis et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007a,b; Addis and Schacter, 2008, 2011; Voss et al., 2011; Johnson et al., 2012).”
BackgroundLieberman, M. D., Straccia, M. A., Meyer, M. L., Du, M., & Tan, K. M. (2019) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2018.12.021 · Cited by 262 · see citing works
Imagine all the people: how the brain creates and uses personality models to predict behavior
Hassabis, D., Spreng, R. N., Rusu, A. A., Robbins, C. A., Mar, R. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht042 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
“Participants were then asked to vividly imagine 12 common everyday locations such as a bar, restaurant, or bank, and to describe them in as much detail as possible (Hassabis, Kumaran, Maguire 2007; Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, et al. 2007).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationZadbood, A., Chen, J., Leong, Y. C., Norman, K. A., & Hasson, U. (2017) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhx202 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
“18 and imagination [13,28,33,34] allows us not only to share our memories with others, but also to 424 invent and share imaginary events with others.”
BackgroundMedial frontal cortex: From self-generated action to reflection on one's own performance
Passingham, R. E., Bengtsson, S. L., & Lau, H. C. (2010) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.11.001 · Cited by 252 · see citing works
Space, time, and episodic memory: The hippocampus is all over the cognitive map
Ekstrom, A. D., & Ranganath, C. (2017) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22750 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
“There is certainly evidence linking the hippocampus to processing of scenes (e.g., Aly et al., 2013; Barense et al., 2010; Bird et al., 2010; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Preston et al., 2010; Stern et al., 2001; Summerfield et al., 2010), but we cannot understand the significance of this evidence in the absence of well-ar…”
BackgroundInfluentialBzdok, D., Langner, R., Schilbach, L., Jakobs, O., Roski, C., Caspers, S., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., Zilles, K., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.046 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“…et al., 2010), self–other distinction (Ruby and Decety, 2001), the contemplation of others' (Mar, 2011) and one's own (Lombardo et al., 2009) mind states, as well as scene construction processes when envisioning past, fictitious , and future events (Hassabis et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009).”
BackgroundThe recursive mind: the origins of human language, thought, and civilization
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.49-1164 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
Bar, M., Aminoff, E., & Schacter, D. L. (2008) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0987-08.2008 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
“…of spatial contexts, and similar networks seem to be involved in remembering past episodes and imagining novel scenes or future events (Addis et al., 2007; Bar, 2007; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Szpunar et al., 2007) (for review and discussion, see Schacter et al., 2007).”
Memory, Imagination, and Predicting the Future
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2013) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858413495091 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Self-citationEpisodic memory and episodic future thinking in adults with autism.
Lind, S. E., & Bowler, D. (2010) · Journal of Abnormal Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0020631 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Segregation of the human medial prefrontal cortex in social cognition
Bzdok, D., Langner, R., Schilbach, L., Engemann, D. A., Laird, A. R., Fox, P. T., & Eickhoff, S. B. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00232 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
“…et al., 2009) mental states, mental navigation of the body in space (Maguire et al., 1997), semantic processing (Binder et al., 2009), as well as scene construction processes when envisioning past, fictitious, and future events (Hassabis et al., 2007; Spreng et al., 2009; Bzdok et al., 2013).”
BackgroundHippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans
Schinazi, V. R., Nardi, D., Newcombe, N. S., Shipley, T. F., & Epstein, R. A. (2013) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.22111 · Cited by 231 · see citing works
“…pointing performance and hippocampal volume was partially (but incompletely) mediated by perspective taking ability, suggesting that part of the advantage of a larger right hippocampus is an enhanced ability to construct an egocentric scene from an arbitrary vantage point (Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundA neural-level model of spatial memory and imagery
Bicanski, A., & Burgess, N. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.33752 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
“Recollection in the BB-model results in visuo-spatial imagery of a coherent scene from a single viewpoint and direction, that is it implements a process of scene construction (Burgess et al., 2001a; Byrne et al., 2007; Schacter et al., 2007; Hassabis et al., 2007; Buckner, 2010) at the neuronal level.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialOn the nature of medial temporal lobe contributions to the constructive simulation of future events
Schacter, D. L., & Addis, D. R. (2009) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0308 · Cited by 226 · see citing works
Kim, H. (2012) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.025 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
“Also in line with the current hypothesis concerning the CMS regions is a recent study by Hassabis et al. (2007).”
InfluentialCortical midline involvement in autobiographical memory
Summerfield, J., Hassabis, D., & Maguire, E. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.033 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
“…memory recall, selfrepresentation, and future thinking (Addis et al., 2007; D'Argembeau et al., 2007; Daselaar et al., 2008; Gilboa et al., 2004; Hassabis et al., 2007a; Johnson et al., 2002; Maguire, 2001a; Northoff et al., 2006; Schacter et al., 2007; Sugiura et al., 2005; Svoboda et al.,…”
InfluentialSelf-citationMertens, L. J., Wall, M. B., Roseman, L., Demetriou, L., Nutt, D. J., & Carhart-Harris, R. L. (2020) · Journal of Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1177/0269881119895520 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
“…the surrounding posterior cingulate is not just involved in visualspatial navigation, but also a component of the DMN, thought to be involved in self-consciousness, reflective self-awareness, episodic memory and imagination (Cavanna and Trimble, 2006; Hassabis et al., 2007; Utevsky et al., 2014).”
BackgroundAddis, D. R., Musicaro, R. M., Pan, L., & Schacter, D. L. (2010) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/a0017280 · Cited by 209 · see citing works
Schacter, D. L., Benoit, R. G., De Brigard, F., & Szpunar, K. K. (2015) · Neurobiology of Learning and Memory · doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2013.12.008 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Remote Memory and the Hippocampus: A Constructive Critique
Barry, D. N., & Maguire, E. A. (2018) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.005 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Self-citationReading fiction and reading minds: the role of simulation in the default network
Tamir, D. I., Bricker, A. B., Dodell-Feder, D., & Mitchell, J. P. (2016) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsv114 · Cited by 212 · see citing works
Frontal pole cortex: encoding ends at the end of the endbrain
Tsujimoto, S., Genovesio, A., & Wise, S. P. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.001 · Cited by 207 · see citing works
The current status of the simulation theory of cognition
Hesslow, G. (2011) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2011.06.026 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Remembering what could have happened: Neural correlates of episodic counterfactual thinking
Brigard, F. D., Addis, D. R., Ford, J. H., Schacter, D. L., & Giovanello, K. S. (2013) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2013.01.015 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
“…during the construction of episodic simulations has been a consistent result in the episodic memory and future thinking literature (Okuda et al., 2003; Szpunar et al., 2007, Hassabis et al., 2007; Weiler et al., 2010; Addiset al. 2007; Addis et al, 2009; Addis, Cheng, Roberts, & Schacter, 2011).”
ResultUnderstanding Human Cognitive Uniqueness
Laland, K. N., & Seed, A. M. (2021) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-062220-051256 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Out-of-body-induced hippocampal amnesia
Bergouignan, L., Nyberg, L., & Ehrsson, H. H. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1318801111 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Retrosplenial cortex codes for permanent landmarks
Auger, S. D., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043620 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
“of RSC in response to the most permanent landmarks, this may help to explain the ubiquity of RSC activations in fMRI studies not only involving scenes and navigation, but also autobiographical memory [46,47] and thinking about the future [76,77].”
BackgroundSelf-citationScrutinizing visual images: The role of gaze in mental imagery and memory
Laeng, B., Bloem, I. M., D’Ascenzo, S., & Tommasi, L. (2014) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2014.01.003 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
Self-reflection and the temporal focus of the wandering mind
Smallwood, J., Schooler, J. W., Turk, D. J., Cunningham, S. J., Burns, P., & Macrae, C. N. (2011) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2010.12.017 · Cited by 202 · see citing works
The Neural Basis of Personal Goal Processing When Envisioning Future Events
D'Argembeau, A., Stawarczyk, D., Majerus, S., Collette, F., Van der Linden, M., Feyers, D., Maquet, P., & Salmon, E. (2010) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21314 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
A New Role for the Parahippocampal Cortex in Representing Space
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2011) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0267-11.2011 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
“This distinction was subsequently affirmed at the neural level, where both the imagination and the viewing of single SD objects (indoor and outdoor) evoked activity within brain regions classically associated with the perception or imagination of full scenes (Epstein and Kanwisher, 1998; Aguirre and D’Esposito, 1999;…”
BackgroundSelf-citationHippocampal contributions to the episodic simulation of specific and general future events
Addis, D. R., Cheng, T., P. Roberts, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2011) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20870 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
“Moreover, Addis and Schacter (2008) found that while posterior hippocampal activity correlated with the amount of detail comprising both past and future events, anterior hippocampal activity correlated only with the amount of detail comprising future events.”
BackgroundStawarczyk, D., & D'Argembeau, A. (2015) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.22818 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
“Most of these regions have been associated with episodic memory retrieval and recent studies suggest that they form a functional subsystem of the DN that supports the construction of detailed mental representations of specific events—episodic simulation or scene construction processes [Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010, 2014…”
InfluentialMedial cortex activity, self-reflection and depression
Johnson, M. K., Nolen-Hoeksema, S., Mitchell, K. J., & Levin, Y. (2009) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsp022 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Concepts and Compositionality: In Search of the Brain's Language of Thought
Frankland, S., & Greene, J. D. (2019) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011829 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Attenuated Boundary Extension Produces a Paradoxical Memory Advantage in Amnesic Patients
Mullally, S. L., Intraub, H., & Maguire, E. A. (2012) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.001 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
“) [7–9].”
Self-citationRosenbaum, R. S., Gilboa, A., Levine, B., Winocur, G., & Moscovitch, M. (2008) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.11.028 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Mental simulation and meaning in life.
Waytz, A., Hershfield, H. E., & Tamir, D. I. (2015) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0038322 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
The fate of memory: Reconsolidation and the case of Prediction Error
Fernández, R. S., Boccia, M. M., & Pedreira, M. E. (2016) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.004 · Cited by 173 · see citing works
Constructing, Perceiving, and Maintaining Scenes: Hippocampal Activity and Connectivity
Zeidman, P., Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu266 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“On the basis that scene construction engages the hippocampus during imagination (Hassabis, Kumaran, Vann, et al. 2007, Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire 2007), we hypothesized that, in neurologically healthy participants, simply perceiving scenes (without a comparison or discrimination task) may…”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialSelf-citationDifferences in Behavior and Brain Activity during Hypothetical and Real Choices
Camerer, C. F., & Mobbs, D. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.11.001 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“[68] documented an imagination network which was commonly activated by recall of both real and (previously) imagined memories, and also by newly imagined scenarios.”
BackgroundXu, X., Yuan, H., & Lei, X. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep21001 · Cited by 167 · see citing works
The Neuropsychological Connection Between Creativity and Meditation
Horan, R. (2009) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410902858691 · Cited by 164 · see citing works
“Theta activity appears in the hippocampal formation (Greenstein, Pavlides, & Winson, 1988 , cited in Klimesche, 1996 ; Larson, Wong, & Lynch, 1986 ), an area important in novelty detection (Knight, 1996 ), and in imagining fictitious scenes (Hassabis, Kumaran, & Maguire, 2007 ).”
BackgroundCommon and Unique Neural Correlates of Autobiographical Memory and Theory of Mind
Rabin, J. S., Gilboa, A., Stuss, D. T., Mar, R. A., & Rosenbaum, R. S. (2009) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21344 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Iglói, K., Zaoui, M., Berthoz, A., & Rondi‐Reig, L. (2009) · Hippocampus · doi:10.1002/hipo.20595 · Cited by 161 · see citing works
“…of the hippocampus in both allocentric and sequential egocentric strategies is in agreement with the theoretical proposition of its role in episodic memory and more precisely in its role in spatiotemporal organization of events (Mizumori et al., 1999; Eichenbaum, 2001; Hassabis et al., 2007).”
ResultStice, E., Burger, K., & Yokum, S. (2013) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.11.028 · Cited by 162 · see citing works
Dynamic neural networks supporting memory retrieval
Jacques, P. L. S., Kragel, P. A., & Rubin, D. C. (2011) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.04.039 · Cited by 156 · see citing works
“…previous research has suggested may support self-referential simulations (for a review see Buckner et al., 2008), and the MTL network associated with declarative memory (Kahn et al., 2008; Vincent et al., 2006) and scene construction (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2010; also see Hassabis et al., 2007).”
BackgroundResultKim, H. (2013) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.21474 · Cited by 169 · see citing works
“…conceiving of others’ viewpoints (theory of mind), social cognition, mental navigation, deductive and inductive reasoning, and mind-wandering [Binder et al., 2009; Buckner and Carroll, 2007; Buckner et al., 2008; Gusnard, 2005; Hassabis et al., 2007; Legrand and Ruby, 2009; Spreng et al., 2009].”
BackgroundRamanan, S., Piguet, O., & Irish, M. (2017) · The Neuroscientist · doi:10.1177/1073858417735514 · Cited by 152 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., & Maguire, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Wellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Hassabis, Demis
- Venue
- The Journal of Neuroscience
- Publisher
- Society for Neuroscience
- Published
- 2007-12-26
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 52
- Pages
- 14365-14374
- ISSN
- 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
- 1529-2401
- PMC
- PMC2571957
- OpenAlex
- W1982298223
- Cited by
- 744
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 56 · 2018: 44 · 2017: 44 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 49 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 48 · 2012: 55
- FWCI
- 15.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Wellcome Trust (071173)
- Brain Research Trust
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Keywords
- episodic memory, imagination, scene construction, hippocampus, parahippocampal gyrus, retrosplenial cortex, anterior medial prefrontal cortex, posterior cingulate cortex, precuneus, episodic future thinking, default mode network, self-processing
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Brain, Brain Mapping, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Memory, Neuropsychological Tests, Oxygen
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read (extract-v2) on 2026-09-25.
Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review