The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Conflict monitoring and cognitive control
Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.108.3.624 · Cited by 7,351
Effects of noise letters upon the identification of a target letter in a nonsearch task
Eriksen, B. A., & Eriksen, C. W. (1974) · Perception & Psychophysics · doi:10.3758/bf03203267 · Cited by 7,230
Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention.
Schneider, W., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.1.1 · Cited by 5,902
Half a century of research on the Stroop effect: An integrative review.
MacLeod, C. M. (1991) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.109.2.163 · Cited by 5,500
A theory of cortical responses.
Friston, K. (2005) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2005.1622 · Cited by 4,578
Monsell, S. (2003) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(03)00028-7 · Cited by 2,984
Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control
Kerns, J. G., Cohen, J. D., MacDonald, A. W., Cho, R. Y., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1089910 · Cited by 2,891
Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility-a model and taxonomy
Kornblum, S., Hasbroucq, T., & Osman, A. (1990) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.97.2.253 · Cited by 1,970 · cited 4×
“potential sources of compatibility (conflict) effects for each task, by showing ‘dimensional overlaps’ [ 17 ] between task-relevant stimulus dimensions (SR), task-irrelevant stimulus dimensions (SI) and the response dimension (R).”
InfluentialOptimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses.
Gratton, G., Coles, M. G. H., & Donchin, E. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480 · Cited by 1,527
Control of Cognitive Processes: Attention and Performance XVIII
Monsell, S., & Driver, J. (2000) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 1,451
Cited by
Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior
Ullsperger, M., Danielmeier, C., & Jocham, G. (2014) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00041.2012 · Cited by 634
Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference
Nigbur, R., Ivanova, G., & Stürmer, B. (2011) · Clinical Neurophysiology · doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2011.03.030 · Cited by 482
The role of inhibition in task switching: A review
Koch, I., Gade, M., Schuch, S., & Philipp, A. M. (2010) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/pbr.17.1.1 · Cited by 493
On Integrating the Components of Self-Control
Kotabe, H. P., & Hofmann, W. (2015) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691615593382 · Cited by 478
Bugg, J. M., & Crump, M. J. C. (2012) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00367 · Cited by 344
Metadata
- Authors
- Egner, T.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-10
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 374-380
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2102281374
- Cited by
- 441
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 0.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
- The paper
- Egner, T. (2008). Multiple conflict-driven control mechanisms in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2008.07.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
