Dopaminergic-neuropeptide interactions in the social brain
Abstract
A well-mapped set of brain regions is dedicated to social cognition. It is responsive to social cues, engaged in moral decision-making and makes predictions about the likely behaviour of other people. Recent studies of affiliation, using animal models, have revealed that specific neurotransmitters and hormones influence the neural circuits of 'the social brain'. There is converging evidence that the interface between the neuropeptides oxytocin and vasopressin and dopaminergic reward circuits is of particular importance. In the context of recent research, we discuss emerging evidence for the impact of these neuropeptides on the regulation of the social brain. We also examine the putative role of allelic variation in candidate genes on individual differences in social cognitive processing and associated social behaviour.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Enhanced processing of social reward would lead to greater sociability.
“supporting the hypothesis that enhanced social reward processing would also lead to heightened sociability.”
From Effects of MDMA on sociability and neural response to social threat and social reward (2009) · cites this paper as Skuse and Gallagher, 2008
Oxytocin is known to stimulate dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, by which it may directly improve approach motivation.
“On the one hand, OT is known to stimulate dopamine release in the nucleus accumbens, by which it may directly improve approach motivation (Depue and Morrone-Strupinsky, 2005;Skuse and Gallagher, 2008).”
From The effect of oxytocin on cooperation in a prisoner's dilemma depends on the social context and a person's social value orientation (2014) · cites this paper as Skuse and Gallagher, 2008
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 95 · Cited by 340
- Authors
- Skuse, D. H., & Gallagher, L.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Tallaght University Hospital (IE)
- Corresponding author
- Skuse, David H.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2009-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-35
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1983572971
- Cited by
- 340
- References
- 95
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 29 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 31
- FWCI
- 2.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
- Wellcome Trust
- Autism Speaks
- Simons Foundation
- Health Research Board
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
- Keywords
- oxytocin, vasopressin, social brain, social cognition, affiliation, ethical decision-making, individual differences, candidate genes, allelic variation
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Brain, Brain Mapping, Dopamine, Humans, Models, Biological, Neuropeptides, Social Behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review