Cited by 2,644Neuroscience and Music PerceptionHearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, GeneticsNeural dynamics and brain function

The mismatch negativity (MMN) in basic research of central auditory processing: A review

Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., Alho, K.·2007·Clinical Neurophysiology

Abstract

In the present article, the basic research using the mismatch negativity (MMN) and analogous results obtained by using the magnetoencephalography (MEG) and other brain-imaging technologies is reviewed. This response is elicited by any discriminable change in auditory stimulation but recent studies extended the notion of the MMN even to higher-order cognitive processes such as those involving grammar and semantic meaning. Moreover, MMN data also show the presence of automatic intelligent processes such as stimulus anticipation at the level of auditory cortex. In addition, the MMN enables one to establish the brain processes underlying the initiation of attention switch to, conscious perception of, sound change in an unattended stimulus stream.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clinph.2007.04.026

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Näätänen, R., Paavilainen, P., Rinne, T., & Alho, K.
Affiliations
University of Helsinki (FI)
Corresponding author
Näätänen, R.
Venue
Clinical Neurophysiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-12
Volume
118
Issue
12
Pages
2544-2590
ISSN
1388-2457 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1975764941
Cited by
2,644
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 136 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 158 · 2023: 143 · 2022: 165 · 2021: 156 · 2020: 175 · 2019: 177 · 2018: 145 · 2017: 146 · 2016: 155 · 2015: 152 · 2014: 156 · 2013: 148 · 2012: 121
FWCI
6.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Neurophysiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Sensory Systems › Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
mismatch negativity, central auditory processing, auditory cortex, attentional shift, semantic processing, grammatical processing
MeSH terms
Animals, Attention, Auditory Perception, Cerebral Cortex, Dominance, Cerebral, Evoked Potentials, Humans, Pitch Discrimination, Reaction Time, Speech Perception, Magnetoencephalography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review