The DOI matches its Crossref record; 54 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
What to believe: Bayesian methods for data analysis
Abstract
Although Bayesian models of mind have attracted great interest from cognitive scientists, Bayesian methods for data analysis have not. This article reviews several advantages of Bayesian data analysis over traditional null-hypothesis significance testing. Bayesian methods provide tremendous flexibility for data analytic models and yield rich information about parameters that can be used cumulatively across progressive experiments. Because Bayesian statistical methods can be applied to any data, regardless of the type of cognitive model (Bayesian or otherwise) that motivated the data collection, Bayesian methods for data analysis will continue to be appropriate even if Bayesian models of mind lose their appeal.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The Bayesian framework was chosen specifically for its ability to represent parameter uncertainty directly through posterior distributions, offering interpretable estimates without relying on sampling distributions from null hypotheses, as required in frequentist approaches [79, 80, 81].”
From Interpersonal Synchronization of Autonomic Physiology via Mere Visual Contact (2026) · cites this paper as [80]
Citations
Cites
Gelman, A., Carlin, J. B., Stern, H. S., & Rubin, D. B. (2003) · doi:10.1201/9780429258480 · Cited by 27,276
(2005) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-387-27255-0_9 · Cited by 20,333
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Nelder, J. A., & Wedderburn, R. W. M. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2344614 · Cited by 7,703
Gelman, A. (2006) · Bayesian Analysis · doi:10.1214/06-ba117a · Cited by 4,050
Bayesian Data Analysis, 2nd edn
Brix, A. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.00347_4.x · Cited by 2,588
A practical solution to the pervasive problems ofp values
Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194105 · Cited by 2,490
The Adaptive Character of Thought
Massaro, D. W., Friedman, D., & Anderson, J. R. (1991) · The American Journal of Psychology · doi:10.2307/1423253 · Cited by 2,174
Bayesian statistical inference for psychological research.
Edwards, W., Lindman, H., & Savage, L. J. (1963) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0044139 · Cited by 1,734
Prior distributions for variance parameters in hierarchical modelsPreprint
Gelman, A. (2004) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,558
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bayesian inference for psychology. Part I: Theoretical advantages and practical ramifications
Wagenmakers, E., Marsman, M., Jamil, T., Ly, A., Verhagen, J., Love, J., Selker, R., Gronau, Q. F., Šmíra, M., Epskamp, S., et al. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3 · Cited by 1,767
Bayesian estimation supersedes the t-test
Kruschke, J. K. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/a0029146 · Cited by 1,530
Self-citationMakowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M., & Lüdecke, D. (2019) · Journal of Open Source Software · doi:10.21105/joss.01541 · Cited by 1,483
Increasing Transparency Through a Multiverse Analysis
Steegen, S., Tuerlinckx, F., Gelman, A., & Vanpaemel, W. (2016) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691616658637 · Cited by 1,512
(2013) · Cited by 1,351
Statistical Evidence in Experimental Psychology: An Empirical Comparison Using 855 t Tests
Wetzels, R., Matzke, D., Lee, M. D., Rouder, J. N., Iverson, G. J., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406923 · Cited by 945
Bayesian Versus Orthodox Statistics: Which Side Are You On?
Dienes, Z. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406920 · Cited by 938
“(Note that I will not discuss confidence intervals and credibility intervals, the Bayesian equivalent to a confidence interval, in this article; see Dienes, 2008, and Kruschke 2010b, 2011, for detailed discussion and calculations.)”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialIndices of Effect Existence and Significance in the Bayesian Framework
Makowski, D., Ben-Shachar, M. S., Chen, S. H. A., & Lüdecke, D. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02767 · Cited by 983
The fallacy of placing confidence in confidence intervals
Morey, R. D., Hoekstra, R., Rouder, J. N., Lee, M. D., & Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-015-0947-8 · Cited by 577
“With modern scientific graphics so easy to create, we see no reason why likelihoods and posteriors cannot augment or even replace intervals in most circumstances (e.g., Kruschke, 2010).”
BackgroundJones, M., & Love, B. C. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10003134 · Cited by 533
Bayesian Assessment of Null Values Via Parameter Estimation and Model Comparison
Kruschke, J. K. (2011) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691611406925 · Cited by 488
Self-citationKruschke, J. K., Aguinis, H., & Joo, H. (2012) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428112457829 · Cited by 478
Self-citationBayesian data analysis for newcomers
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1272-1 · Cited by 439
Self-citationAhn, W., Haines, N., & Zhang, L. (2017) · Computational Psychiatry · doi:10.1162/cpsy_a_00002 · Cited by 385
The evolutionary basis of human social learning
Morgan, T., Rendell, L., Ehn, M., Hoppitt, W., & Laland, K. (2012) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2011.1172 · Cited by 350
Measuring Distribution Similarities Between Samples: A Distribution-Free Overlapping Index
Pastore, M., & Calcagnì, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01089 · Cited by 320
How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical Bayesian models
Lee, M. D. (2010) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.08.013 · Cited by 313
Brain structure and cognitive ability in healthy aging: a review on longitudinal correlated change
Oschwald, J., Guye, S., Liem, F., Rast, P., Willis, S. L., Röcke, C., Jäncke, L., Martin, M., & Mérillat, S. (2019) · Reviews in the Neurosciences · doi:10.1515/revneuro-2018-0096 · Cited by 273
Chowdhury, D. (2013) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2013.03.005 · Cited by 221
False positives and other statistical errors in standard analyses of eye movements in reading
von der Malsburg, T., & Angele, B. (2016) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2016.10.003 · Cited by 231
Safeguard Power as a Protection Against Imprecise Power Estimates
Perugini, M., Gallucci, M., & Costantini, G. (2014) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691614528519 · Cited by 203
A causal account of the brain network computations underlying strategic social behavior
Hill, C., Suzuki, S., Polanía, R., Moisa, M., O’Doherty, J. P., & Ruff, C. C. (2017) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.4602 · Cited by 196
Ahn, W., Vasilev, G. N., Lee, S., Busemeyer, J. R., Kruschke, J. K., Bechara, A., & Vassileva, J. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00849 · Cited by 189
Self-citationWang, M., Beal, D. J., Chan, D. K., Newman, D. A., Vancouver, J. B., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2016) · Work Aging and Retirement · doi:10.1093/workar/waw033 · Cited by 213
The logical primitives of thought: Empirical foundations for compositional cognitive models.
Piantadosi, S. T., Tenenbaum, J. B., & Goodman, N. D. (2016) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0039980 · Cited by 195
Adapting fit indices for Bayesian structural equation modeling: Comparison to maximum likelihood.
Garnier‐Villarreal, M., & Jorgensen, T. D. (2019) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/met0000224 · Cited by 177
Prior sensitivity in theory testing: An apologia for the Bayes factor
Vanpaemel, W. (2010) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2010.07.003 · Cited by 170
Olson, J. S., & Kellogg, W. A. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8 · Cited by 171
Gluth, S., Sommer, T., Rieskamp, J., & Büchel, C. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.04.023 · Cited by 141
A Primer for Conducting Experiments in Human–Robot Interaction
Hoffman, G., & Zhao, X. (2020) · ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction · doi:10.1145/3412374 · Cited by 150
What Does It Mean to be Biased
Hahn, U., & Harris, A. J. L. (2014) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-800283-4.00002-2 · Cited by 150
Estimating adolescent sleep need using dose-response modeling
Short, M. A., Weber, N., Reynolds, C. M., Coussens, S. W., & Carskadon, M. A. (2018) · SLEEP · doi:10.1093/sleep/zsy011 · Cited by 124
Brown, V. M., Zhu, L., Solway, A., Wang, J. M., McCurry, K. L., King-Casas, B., & Chiu, P. H. (2021) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1844 · Cited by 112
In search of on-line locality effects in sentence comprehension.
Bartek, B., Lewis, R. L., Vasishth, S., & Smith, M. R. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0024194 · Cited by 104
Schneider, J. W. (2014) · Scientometrics · doi:10.1007/s11192-014-1251-5 · Cited by 112
Strategies to intervene on causal systems are adaptively selected
Coenen, A., Rehder, B., & Gureckis, T. M. (2015) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2015.02.004 · Cited by 101
Strengthening statistical usage in marine ecology
Beninger, P., Boldina, I., & Katsanevakis, S. (2012) · Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology · doi:10.1016/j.jembe.2012.05.020 · Cited by 85
Using priors to formalize theory: Optimal attention and the generalized context model
Vanpaemel, W., & Lee, M. (2012) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-012-0300-4 · Cited by 138
Statistical measures for workload capacity analysis
Houpt, J. W., & Townsend, J. T. (2012) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2012.05.004 · Cited by 91
Newborn chickens generate invariant object representations at the onset of visual object experience
Wood, J. N. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1308246110 · Cited by 91
Vasilev, M. R., & Angele, B. (2016) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-016-1147-x · Cited by 92
Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation for treating depression: A modeling study
Csifcsák, G., Boayue, N. M., Puonti, O., Thielscher, A., & Mittner, M. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.02.077 · Cited by 82
Bartlema, A., Lee, M. D., Wetzels, R., & Vanpaemel, W. (2014) · Journal of Mathematical Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jmp.2013.12.002 · Cited by 81
Spontaneous dyadic behavior predicts the emergence of interpersonal neural synchrony
Koul, A., Ahmar, D., Iannetti, G. D., & Novembre, G. (2023) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2023.120233 · Cited by 75
Number-knower levels in young children: Insights from Bayesian modeling
Lee, M. D., & Sarnecka, B. W. (2010) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2010.10.003 · Cited by 73
Rethinking statistical analysis methods for CHI
Kaptein, M. C., & Robertson, J. (2012) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/2207676.2208557 · Cited by 72
Fritz, A., Scherndl, T., & Kühberger, A. (2012) · Theory & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959354312436870 · Cited by 77
When decision heuristics and science collide
Yu, E. C., Sprenger, A. M., Thomas, R. P., & Dougherty, M. R. P. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0495-z · Cited by 74
Physiological Linkage of Dyadic Gaming Experience
Järvelä, S., Kivikangas, J. M., Kätsyri, J., & Ravaja, N. (2014) · Simulation & Gaming · doi:10.1177/1046878113513080 · Cited by 86
Winans-Mitrik, R. L., Hula, W. D., Dickey, M. W., Schumacher, J. G., Swoyer, B., & Doyle, P. J. (2014) · American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology · doi:10.1044/2014_ajslp-13-0102 · Cited by 69
Kruschke, J. K. (2012) · British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.2012.02063.x · Cited by 65
Self-citationThe frequentist implications of optional stopping on Bayesian hypothesis tests
Sanborn, A. N., & Hills, T. T. (2013) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0518-9 · Cited by 66
A meta-analysis of the survival-processing advantage in memory
Scofield, J. E., Buchanan, E. M., & Kostic, B. N. (2017) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/s13423-017-1346-0 · Cited by 67
Abramovitch (2019) · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2018.09.001 · Cited by 59
Bayesian Probability and Statistics in Management Research
Zyphur, M. J., & Oswald, F. L. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206312463183 · Cited by 65
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2015) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2606016 · Cited by 57
Self-citationAuditory information enhances post-sensory visual evidence during rapid multisensory decision-making
Franzen, L., Delis, I., De Sousa, G., Kayser, C., & Philiastides, M. G. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19306-7 · Cited by 57
The replication crisis, scientific revolutions, and linguistics
Sönning, L., & Werner, V. (2021) · Linguistics · doi:10.1515/ling-2019-0045 · Cited by 64
Social Beliefs and Visual Attention: How the Social Relevance of a Cue Influences Spatial Orienting
Gobel, M. S., Tufft, M. R. A., & Richardson, D. C. (2017) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.12529 · Cited by 58
O’Brien, K. A., Atkinson, R. A., Richardson, L., Koulman, A., Murray, A. J., Harridge, S. D. R., Martín, D., Levett, D. Z. H., Mitchell, K., Mythen, M. G., et al. (2019) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-019-38832-z · Cited by 54
Rodríguez‐Aranda, C., Mittner, M., & Vasylenko, O. (2016) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.1177/0031512516628370 · Cited by 47
Tucker, B. V., & Ernestus, M. (2016) · The Mental Lexicon · doi:10.1075/ml.11.3.03tuc · Cited by 43
Think twice and then: Combining or choosing in dialectical bootstrapping?
Herzog, S. M., & Hertwig, R. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0034054 · Cited by 44
The impact of embodying an “elderly” body avatar on motor imagery
Beaudoin, M., Barra, J., Dupraz, L., Mollier-Sabet, P., & Guerraz, M. (2020) · Experimental Brain Research · doi:10.1007/s00221-020-05828-5 · Cited by 41
Significance testing as perverse probabilistic reasoning
Westover, M. B., Westover, K. D., & Bianchi, M. T. (2011) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-9-20 · Cited by 43
Moors, P., Wagemans, J. P., & de‐Wit, L. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0098298 · Cited by 42
Using hierarchical Bayesian methods to examine the tools of decision-making
Lee, M. D., & Newell, B. R. (2011) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500004253 · Cited by 39
Social Influences in Sequential Decision Making
Schöbel, M., Rieskamp, J., & Huber, R. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0146536 · Cited by 39
Applying Bayesian statistics to the study of psychological trauma: A suggestion for future research.
Yalch, M. (2016) · Psychological Trauma · doi:10.1037/tra0000096 · Cited by 38
Information transfer within and between autistic and non-autistic people
Crompton, C. J., Foster, S. J., Wilks, C. E. H., Dodd, M., Efthimiou, T. N., Ropar, D., Sasson, N. J., Lages, M., & Fletcher‐Watson, S. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-025-02163-z · Cited by 45
Making sense together: A dynamical account of linguistic meaning-making
Tylén, K., Fusaroli, R., Bundgaard, P. F., & Østergaard, S. (2013) · Semiotica · doi:10.1515/sem-2013-0021 · Cited by 44
Working memory gating mechanisms explain developmental change in rule-guided behavior
Unger, K., Ackerman, L. K., Chatham, C. H., Amso, D., & Badre, D. (2016) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.020 · Cited by 43
Cancer Exacerbates Chemotherapy-Induced Sensory Neuropathy
Housley, S. N., Nardelli, P., Carrasco, D. I., Rotterman, T. M., Pfahl, E., Matyunina, L. V., McDonald, J. F., & Cope, T. C. (2020) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-19-2331 · Cited by 38
Ouédraogo, M., Samadoulougou, S., Rouamba, T., Hien, H., Sawadogo, J. M., Tinto, H., Alegana, V. A., Speybroeck, N., & Kirakoya‐Samadoulougou, F. (2018) · Malaria Journal · doi:10.1186/s12936-018-2606-9 · Cited by 36
Huygelier, H., Schraepen, B., Demeyere, N., & Gillebert, C. R. (2019) · Aging Neuropsychology and Cognition · doi:10.1080/13825585.2019.1680598 · Cited by 35
Promoting subjective preferences in simple economic choices during nap
Ai, S., Yin, Y., Chen, Y., Wang, C., Sun, Y., Tang, X., Lü, L., Zhu, L., & Shi, J. (2018) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.40583 · Cited by 31
Gergle, D., & Tan, D. S. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-0378-8_9 · Cited by 41
Introduction to Bayesian Modeling and Inference for Fisheries Scientists
Doll, J. C., & Jacquemin, S. (2018) · Fisheries · doi:10.1002/fsh.10038 · Cited by 35
Delis, I., Ince, R. A. A., Sajda, P., & Wang, Q. (2022) · Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.0861-21.2022 · Cited by 35
Kessler, R., Schmitt, S., Sauder, T., Stein, F., Yüksel, D., Grotegerd, D., Dannlowski, U., Hahn, T., Dempfle, A., Sommer, J. B., et al. (2020) · Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnsys.2020.00028 · Cited by 36
Strategies for exploration in the domain of losses
Krueger, P. M., Wilson, R. C., & Cohen, J. D. (2017) · Judgment and Decision Making · doi:10.1017/s1930297500005659 · Cited by 38
Martín-Pérez, C., Navas, J. F., Perales, J. C., López‐Martín, Á., Cordovilla‐Guardia, S., Portillo, M., Maldonado, A., & Vilar‐López, R. (2019) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0226271 · Cited by 33
The phenomenology of Aha-experiences.
Skaar, Ø. O., & Reber, R. (2019) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000138 · Cited by 35
Complexity, attention, and choice in games under time constraints: A process analysis.
Spiliopoulos, L., Ortmann, A., & Zhang, L. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/xlm0000535 · Cited by 32
Confidence Intervals Make a Difference
Hoekstra, R., Johnson, A. M., & Kiers, H. (2012) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164412450297 · Cited by 15
Bayesian data analysis for newcomersPreprint
Kruschke, J. K., & Liddell, T. M. (2017) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nqfr5 · Cited by 40
Self-citationDelis, I., Dmochowski, J., Sajda, P., & Wang, Q. (2018) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.03.035 · Cited by 30
Tsirgiotis, J. M., Young, R. L., & Weber, N. (2021) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-021-05300-5 · Cited by 22
A Bayesian Primer for the Organizational Sciences
Jebb, A. T., & Woo, S. E. (2014) · Organizational Research Methods · doi:10.1177/1094428114553060 · Cited by 29
Dispositional mindfulness attenuates the emotional attentional blink
Makowski, D., Sperduti, M., Lavallée, S., Nicolas, S., & Piolino, P. (2019) · Consciousness and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.concog.2018.11.004 · Cited by 28
Sarma, A., & Kay, M. (2020) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3313831.3376377 · Cited by 29
Knapp, P. F., Glinsky, M. E., Schaeuble, M.-A., Jennings, C. A., Evans, M., Gunning, J. S., Awe, T. J., Chandler, G. A., Geißel, M., Gómez, M. R., et al. (2022) · Physics of Plasmas · doi:10.1063/5.0087115 · Cited by 28
Hoverd, W. J., Bulbulia, J. A., Partow, N., & Sibley, C. G. (2013) · Religion Brain & Behavior · doi:10.1080/2153599x.2013.824497 · Cited by 27
Uchihara, T., Eguchi, M., Clenton, J., Kyle, K. D., & Saito, K. (2021) · Language and Speech · doi:10.1177/00238309211013865 · Cited by 29
Valence bias in metacontrol of decision making in adolescents and young adults
Bolenz, F., & Eppinger, B. (2021) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13693 · Cited by 27
Karpen, S. C. (2017) · American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education · doi:10.5688/ajpe6570 · Cited by 25
Pailhès, A., & Kuhn, G. (2020) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1177/1747021820932916 · Cited by 25
Does Science Presuppose Naturalism (or Anything at All)?
Fishman, Y. I., & Boudry, M. (2013) · Science & Education · doi:10.1007/s11191-012-9574-1 · Cited by 28
Investigating the use of formant frequencies in listener judgments of speaker size
Barreda, S. (2015) · Journal of Phonetics · doi:10.1016/j.wocn.2015.11.004 · Cited by 25
Experiment and Animal Minds: Why the Choice of the Null Hypothesis Matters
Mikhalevich, I. (2015) · Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1086/683440 · Cited by 25
Metadata
- Authors
- Kruschke, J. K.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University Bloomington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kruschke, John K.
- ORCID
- Kruschke, John K.
- Venue
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-07
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 293-300
- ISSN
- 1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1964645108
- Semantic Scholar
- 7d132ec7b7f94fe1397f6c1e8e5bb4fa42806ad1
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 54
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 20
- FWCI
- 2.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- Bayesian analysis, null hypothesis significance testing, cumulative evidence, cognitive models, statistical inference
- MeSH terms
- Bayes Theorem, Humans, Research Design, Statistics as Topic, Reproducibility of Results
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review