Food fraud: An exploratory study for measuring consumer perception towards mislabeled food products and influence on self-authentication intentions
Abstract
The present study explores the concept of mistrust in country of origin information and the use of technology by consumers to corroborate information on food labels. Despite the plethora of food studies on trust conveyed by different sources, there appears to be a lack of studies exploring consumers' willingness to substantiate information on food labels, more specifically country of origin, and how it is influenced by mistrust. A self-administered survey was conducted in the city of Innsbruck, Austria, to evaluate the relationship between mistrust and the willingness to use technology and verify food label information in food stores. This present study suggests that mistrust towards industry and/or regulators in general augments consumers' willingness to self-authenticate. Findings also suggest that highly educated consumers are more likely to distrust the information on food labels, and are more willing to use a device to validate food label content. Expected results suggest that consumers who read labels on a regular basis expressed a higher willingness to self-authenticate, and that women are more likely to read labels than men. Limitations of the study are presented; theoretical significance and practical implications of the findings are also discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Many traceability systems are ineffective: frauds are still quite widespread.
“However, even today there are several shortcomings because many traceability systems are ineffective: frauds are still quite widespread [94], while the recall costs are often very high in the case of food scandals because the granular traceability is onerous, especially in the case of batch mixing [95].”
From A Review of Blockchain-Based Systems in Transportation (2019) · cites this paper as [94]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 191
- Authors
- Charlebois, S., Schwab, A., Henn, R., & Huck, C. W.
- Affiliations
- University of Guelph (CA)
- Universität Innsbruck (AT)
- Corresponding author
- Charlebois, Sylvain
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-04
- Volume
- 50
- Pages
- 211-218
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2287941411
- Cited by
- 191
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 28 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 23.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Innsbruck
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Supply Chain Traceability
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Identification and Quantification in Food
- Keywords
- food fraud, consumer perception, distrust, country of origin labeling, self-authentication, consumer technology use, consumer education
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review