The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Recent progress in the utilization of pea protein as an emulsifier for food applications
Abstract
Abstract Background There is an increasing movement within the food industry to find consumer friendly plant protein ingredients to replace those from animal sources. Pea (Pisum sativum L.) protein has been extensively studied because it provides good nutritional properties, functionality, is readily available, and has low allergenicity. Scope and approach The focus of this review is a summary of the current progress in understanding and characterizing the use of pea protein as an emulsifier. The emulsification properties of pea protein are described in comparison to other protein emulsifiers. The impact of origin, processing, and environmental conditions like temperature, pH, and ionic strength is discussed. The physicochemical properties of the protein, such as solubility, surface charge, hydrophobicity, and composition are also covered, along with current methods to improve functionality. Key findings and conclusions One of the most valuable functional properties of pea protein is emulsification, which can be affected by its origin, isolation method, and the environmental or processing conditions (pH, ionic strength, and temperature). The physicochemical properties including solubility, surface charge/hydrophobicity, and interfacial properties have been examined to evaluate their emulsifying functionality. While several methods such as complexation, glycosylation, and enzymatic hydrolysis have been developed to further improve the pea protein, there remains a gap between the functionality of laboratory and commercially prepared products. There is an opportunity to increase the functionality of pea protein by understanding and closing this gap.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Review of the health benefits of peas ( Pisum sativum L.)
Dahl, W. J., Foster, L. M., & Tyler, R. T. (2012) · British Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1017/s0007114512000852 · Cited by 434
Adebiyi, A. P., & Aluko, R. E. (2011) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2011.03.116 · Cited by 377
Profile and Functional Properties of Seed Proteins from Six Pea (Pisum sativum) Genotypes
Barac, M., Cabrilo, S., Pesic, M., Stanojevic, S., Zilic, S., Macej, O., & Ristic, N. (2010) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms11124973 · Cited by 368
Functional Properties of Pea (Pisum sativum, L.) Protein Isolates Modified with Chymosin
Barać, M., Čabrilo, S., Pešić, M., Stanojević, S., Pavlićević, M., Maćej, O., & Ristić, N. (2011) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms12128372 · Cited by 113
Functional properties of protein hydrolysates from pea (Pisum sativum, L) seeds
Barac, M., Cabrilo, S., Stanojevic, S., Pesic, M., Pavlicevic, M., Zlatkovic, B., & Jankovic, M. (2012) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2621.2012.02993.x · Cited by 82
Cited by
Ge, J., Sun, C., Corke, H., Gul, K., Gan, R., & Fang, Y. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12573 · Cited by 318
Dairy and plant proteins as natural food emulsifiers
Kim, W., Wang, Y., & Selomulya, C. (2020) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2020.09.012 · Cited by 316
Zhang, J., Liu, Q., Chen, Q., Sun, F., Liu, H., & Kong, B. (2022) · Ultrasonics Sonochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106099 · Cited by 200
Shen, Y., & Li, Y. (2021) · Food Hydrocolloids · doi:10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.106686 · Cited by 164
Fang, B., Chang, L., Ohm, J.-B., Chen, B., & Rao, J. (2023) · Food Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.135001 · Cited by 112
Metadata
- Authors
- Burger, T. G., & Zhang, Y.
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 86
- Pages
- 25-33
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2914047343
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.