Review of the health benefits of peas ( Pisum sativum L.)
Open accessAbstract
Pulses, including peas, have long been important components of the human diet due to their content of starch, protein and other nutrients. More recently, the health benefits other than nutrition associated with pulse consumption have attracted much interest. The focus of the present review paper is the demonstrated and potential health benefits associated with the consumption of peas, Pisum sativum L., specifically green and yellow cotyledon dry peas, also known as smooth peas or field peas. These health benefits derive mainly from the concentration and properties of starch, protein, fibre, vitamins, minerals and phytochemicals in peas. Fibre from the seed coat and the cell walls of the cotyledon contributes to gastrointestinal function and health, and reduces the digestibility of starch in peas. The intermediate amylose content of pea starch also contributes to its lower glycaemic index and reduced starch digestibility. Pea protein, when hydrolysed, may yield peptides with bioactivities, including angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitor activity and antioxidant activity. The vitamin and mineral contents of peas may play important roles in the prevention of deficiency-related diseases, specifically those related to deficiencies of Se or folate. Peas contain a variety of phytochemicals once thought of only as antinutritive factors. These include polyphenolics, in coloured seed coat types in particular, which may have antioxidant and anticarcinogenic activity, saponins which may exhibit hypocholesterolaemic and anticarcinogenic activity, and galactose oligosaccharides which may exert beneficial prebiotic effects in the large intestine.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Optimal temperature conditions are critical for the metabolic processes involved in seedling growth.
“Some studies [3,15] have shown that optimal temperature conditions are critical for the metabolic processes involved in seedling growth.”
From Optimizing Water, Temperature, and Density Conditions for In Vitro Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Germination (2024) · cites this paper as [3]
The Protein section says environmental conditions may influence protein concentration in pea seeds, but it does not address optimal temperature or metabolic processes during seedling growth. Searches for those terms and for temperature, germination, and seedling growth found no supporting passage in our copy; page numbers were not available. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Grosjean F (1985) Combining peas for animal nutrition. In The Pea Crop: A Basis for Improvement, pp. 453-462 [PD Hebblethwaite, MC Heath and TCK Dawkins, editors]. London: Butterworths.
- Norton G, Bliss FA & Bressani R (1985) Biochemical and nutritional attributes of grain legumes. Grain Legume Crops. pp. 73-114 [RJ Summerfield and EH Roberts, editors]. London: Collins.
- Salunke DK, Kadam SS & Chavan JK (1985) Chemical com- position. In Postharvest Biotechnology of Food Legumes, pp. 29 -52. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
- Savage GP & Deo S (1989) The nutritional value of peas (Pisum sativum). A literature review. Nutr Abstr Rev Series A. Human Exp Nutr 59, 65-87.
- Hoover R, Hughes T, Chung HJ, et al. (2010) Composition, molecular structure, properties, and modification of pulse starches: a review. Food Res Int 43, 399 -413.
- Perera A, Meda V & Tyler RT (2010) Resistant starch: a review of analytical protocols for determining resistant starch and of factors affecting the resistant starch content of foods. Food Res Int 43, 1959 -1974.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Health implications of dietary fiber
Dahl, W. J., & Stewart, M. L. (2015) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2015.09.003 · Cited by 471 · see citing works
Self-citationGe, J., Sun, C., Corke, H., Gul, K., Gan, R., & Fang, Y. (2020) · Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety · doi:10.1111/1541-4337.12573 · Cited by 318 · see citing works
Singh, N. (2017) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-017-2537-4 · Cited by 290 · see citing works
Hashemi, Z., Fouhse, J., Im, H., Chan, C., & Willing, B. (2017) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu9111236 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Pea protein [Pisum sativum] as stabilizer for oil/water emulsions
Olsmats, E., & Rennie, A. R. (2024) · Advances in Colloid and Interface Science · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2024.103123 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Identifying crop variants with high resistant starch content to maintain healthy glucose homeostasis
Petropoulou, K., Chambers, E. S., Morrison, D. J., Preston, T., Godsland, I. F., Wilde, P., Narbad, A., Parker, R., Salt, L., Morris, V. J., et al. (2016) · Nutrition Bulletin · doi:10.1111/nbu.12240 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Kende, Z., Piroska, P., Szemők, G. E., Khaeim, H., Sghaier, A. H., Gyuricza, C., & Tarnawa, Á. (2024) · Plants · doi:10.3390/plants13192776 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Incorporating Whole Pulse Flour from Cowpea, Navy Bean, and Red Bean in Whole Wheat Flour Bread
Rajpurohit, B., Tilley, M., Wu, X., & Li, Y. (2025) · Cereal Chemistry · doi:10.1002/cche.70018 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
- Authors
- Dahl, W. J., Foster, L. M., & Tyler, R. T.
- Affiliations
- University of Florida (US)
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Dahl, Wendy J.
- ORCID
- Dahl, Wendy J.
- Venue
- British Journal of Nutrition
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2012-08-23
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- S3-S10
- ISSN
- 0007-1145 (ISSN-L)
- 1475-2662
- OpenAlex
- W2093507745
- Cited by
- 434
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 29 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal Of Nutrition (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Food composition and properties
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food and Agricultural Sciences
- Keywords
- pea, Pisum sativum, health benefits, pea starch, amylose content, glycemic index, starch digestibility, pea protein, bioactive peptides, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition, antioxidant activity, vitamin and mineral content, selenium deficiency, folate deficiency, polyphenols, saponins, prebiotic activity, dietary fiber, anticarcinogenic activity
- MeSH terms
- Amylose, Animals, Antioxidants, Diet, Dietary Fiber, Dietary Proteins, Digestion, Health Promotion, Humans, Minerals, Nutritive Value, Seeds, Starch, Vitamins, Pisum sativum, Glycemic Index
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review