Cited by 98Food Safety and HygieneRegulation and Compliance StudiesQuality and Management Systems

Government regulations and voluntary certifications in food safety in China: A review

Guo, Zaidi, Bai, Li, Gong, Shunlong·2019·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

With the improvement of living standards, people are paying increasing attention to the quality of food. From the perspective of food companies, there are two driving powers to improve quality: government regulations as the external factor and voluntary certifications as the internal factor. Regulation is an intervention on the market by the government through administrative means. The third-party certification voluntarily sought by companies, which enhances company competitive advantage through improving consumers’ acceptance and recognition, belongs to internal driving force.Beginning with the current food safety situation in China, this paper describes the changes in government regulatory agencies and compares the similarities and differences of regulatory systems with the United States, the European Union and Japan. This study examines the development of the Chinese food safety regulatory system since 1949, which can be a reference to other developing countries. Moreover, this paper explains the current status of product certifications and system certifications in China.Lack of social responsibility, inadequate awareness of food risks, pursuit of short-term economic benefits and poor processing technology are the root causes of food safety incidents in China. Based on the analysis of food safety regulation system in China and comparison with the systems in other developed counties. The authors proposed two suggestions. The first suggestion is to reform food safety system, such as formulating food safety laws, enforcing social supervision and so on. The other suggestion is to encourage small and medium food companies to implement product and system certifications.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.04.014

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Guo, Z., Bai, L., & Gong, S.
Affiliations
Jilin University (CN)
Corresponding author
Gong, Shunlong
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
90
Pages
160-165
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937474676
Cited by
98
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 3
FWCI
8.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (71573103)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Food Safety and Hygiene
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Regulation and Compliance Studies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Quality and Management Systems
Keywords
food safety regulation, voluntary certification, third-party certification, United States, European Union, Japan, social supervision, food safety incidents, food safety legislation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review