Cited by 85Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture StudiesAgricultural safety and regulationsEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Integrated Multitrophic Aquaculture Systems—Potential Risks for Food Safety

Rosa, João, Lemos, Marco F.L., Crespo, Daniel, Nunes, Margarida, Freitas, Andreia, Ramos, Fernando, Pardal, Miguel Ângelo, Leston, Sara·2020·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

The demand for fish and fish products is now higher than ever. However, several problems such as nutrient loading or excessive use of resources can be associated with the intensification of aquaculture systems. Integrated multitrophic aquaculture systems (IMTAs) refer to the co-culture of different species belonging to different trophic levels, and offer a sustainable approach to aquaculture development. In these systems, organic and inorganic extractive species will feed on other species waste or on uneaten feed nutrients, acting as bioremediators.The extractive capacity that these organisms have to take up nutrients from the water also means they will accumulate chemicals that are often administered in intensive productions. The present review describes a vast number of substances that can be found in IMTAs, either intentionally administered or resulting from contamination, and subsequently accumulated in species reared afterwards in these systems. The presence of such chemicals in organisms produced in IMTAs raises several food safety and human health concerns, which need to be addressed.Although IMTAs still face many challenges in terms of large scale production, legislations are not yet ready to comprise co-cultivation of multiple species in proximity. Also, maximum residue limits already existent for fish must be set for other organisms also produced in IMTAs in order to protect consumer's health. An increase in extractive species consumption (e.g. seaweeds) has been noticed during the past few years, and as IMTAs gain importance as a sustainable production method, food safety issues must be tackled.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2019.12.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 133 · Cited by 85

Authors
Rosa, J., Lemos, M. F. L., Crespo, D., Nunes, M., Freitas, A., Ramos, F., Pardal, M. Â., & Leston, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Coimbra (PT)
  • Universidade de Leiria e Oeste (PT)
  • Instituto Nacional de Investigação Agrária e Veterinária (PT)
Corresponding author
Leston, Sara
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-02
Volume
96
Pages
79-90
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2995606450
Cited by
85
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 8
FWCI
4.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Food Science & Technology (publishedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (SFRH/BPD/91828/2012, SFRH/BD/102008/2014)
  • European Commission
  • Programa Operacional Regional do Centro
  • European Regional Development Fund
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine Bivalve and Aquaculture Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, food safety, chemical residues, maximum residue limits, nutrient uptake, bioremediation, aquaculture intensification, human health risk, seaweed, sustainable aquaculture

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review