A review on customizing edible food materials into 3D printable inks: Approaches and strategies
Open accessAbstract
Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging technology that has been a subject of interest in many areas, including agriculture and food science. AM technology can be used in three-dimensional (3D) food fabrication in an additive manner based on computer-aided design (CAD) data. 3D food printing technology offers many advantages over traditional methods: rapid prototyping without using molds or casts, providing customized foods, creating foods with complex shapes and structures, personalized nutrition, high efficiency, and low cost of production. It is crucial to have a systematic approach for food printings and redefine the printability to use a wide range of food materials.This review article summarizes recent advances in 3D food printing with a focus on current approaches to define the printability and optimize the food ink formulas, the mechanisms of AM technology, and the suitability of food materials as precursors for 3D printing (3DP). The major steps associated with 3DP technology from the food perspective are elucidated in this review, which involve various approaches and strategies of 3DP.A systematic manufacturing approach is essential for a better understanding of the 3DP process rather than focusing on the machine parts. Framing each step in the 3DP and depicting the workflow suitable for food printings may simplify the research steps and accelerate high-quality 3DP for the food applications. Redefining the printability and summarizing existing approaches to obtain printable food materials will lay the foundation for future studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
After deposition in hydrogel-forming extrusion, molecules begin to crosslink, for example in the presence of calcium cation.
“After the deposition, the molecules began to crosslink–e.g., in the presence of calcium cation [33,47].”
From Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
If the extruder part of a 3D printer is made of plastic, there is a risk of contamination.
“If the extruder part is made of plastic, there is a risk of contamination [13,47].”
From Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: a critical review
Saha, D., & Bhattacharya, S. (2010) · Journal of Food Science and Technology · doi:10.1007/s13197-010-0162-6 · Cited by 1,356 · see citing works
Dick, A., Bhandari, B., & Prakash, S. (2019) · Meat Science · doi:10.1016/j.meatsci.2019.03.005 · Cited by 264 · see citing works
3D food printing: a categorised review of inks and their development
Voon, S. L., An, J., Wong, G., Zhang, Y., & Chua, C. K. (2019) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2019.1603508 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A review on 3D printable food materials: types and development trends
Li, G., Hu, L., Liu, J., Huang, J., Yuan, C., Takaki, K., & Hu, Y. (2022) · International Journal of Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1111/ijfs.15391 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Towards the development of foods 3D printer: Trends and technologies for foods printing
Neamah, H. A., & Tandio, J. (2024) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e33882 · Cited by 43 · see citing works
“After the deposition, the molecules began to crosslink – e.g., in the presence of calcium cation [33,47].”
BackgroundBisht, B., Begum, J. P. S., Dmitriev, A. A., Kurbatova, A., Singh, N., Nishinari, K., Nanda, M., Kumar, S., Vlaskin, M. S., & Kumar, V. (2024) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2024.104471 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Guaqueta-Garcia, D. J., Wolodko, J., & Wismer, W. (2025) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-03-2024-0255 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Pulatsu, E., & Lin, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lin, Mengshi
- Venue
- Trends in Food Science & Technology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 68-77
- ISSN
- 0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3109026878
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Trends in Food Science & Technology (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Agriculture
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
- Keywords
- 3D food printing, edible ink, printability, additive manufacturing, ink formulation, personalized nutrition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review