Cited by 112Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials3D Printing in Biomedical Research

A review on customizing edible food materials into 3D printable inks: Approaches and strategies

Open access
Pulatsu, Ezgi, Lin, Mengshi·2021·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Abstract

Additive manufacturing (AM) is an emerging technology that has been a subject of interest in many areas, including agriculture and food science. AM technology can be used in three-dimensional (3D) food fabrication in an additive manner based on computer-aided design (CAD) data. 3D food printing technology offers many advantages over traditional methods: rapid prototyping without using molds or casts, providing customized foods, creating foods with complex shapes and structures, personalized nutrition, high efficiency, and low cost of production. It is crucial to have a systematic approach for food printings and redefine the printability to use a wide range of food materials.This review article summarizes recent advances in 3D food printing with a focus on current approaches to define the printability and optimize the food ink formulas, the mechanisms of AM technology, and the suitability of food materials as precursors for 3D printing (3DP). The major steps associated with 3DP technology from the food perspective are elucidated in this review, which involve various approaches and strategies of 3DP.A systematic manufacturing approach is essential for a better understanding of the 3DP process rather than focusing on the machine parts. Framing each step in the 3DP and depicting the workflow suitable for food printings may simplify the research steps and accelerate high-quality 3DP for the food applications. Redefining the printability and summarizing existing approaches to obtain printable food materials will lay the foundation for future studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2020.11.023

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pulatsu, E., & Lin, M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Mengshi
Venue
Trends in Food Science & Technology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-01
Volume
107
Pages
68-77
ISSN
0924-2244 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109026878
Cited by
112
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Trends in Food Science & Technology (acceptedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
3D food printing, edible ink, printability, additive manufacturing, ink formulation, personalized nutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review