Cited by 175Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction Materials3D Printing in Biomedical Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

3D food printing: a categorised review of inks and their development

Open access
Voon, Siew Li, An, Jia, Wong, Gladys, Zhang, Yi, Chua, Chee Kai·2019·Virtual and Physical Prototyping

Abstract

3D food printing, or the use of food materials in additive manufacturing, has been a topic of interest to the commercial sector for the past decade. Recently, there has also been increased attention from the academic field, with a considerable volume of research being published. Most of these studies have focused on developing food inks for extrusion-based printing beyond conventional materials such as chocolate, resulting in a much wider range of printable and edible materials. The formulations of these materials are of particular interest, as they determine the rheological and mechanical properties of food inks, thereby affecting the final quality of the printed food. This article reviews the current status and possible directions in food ink research across five categories, namely confectionery, dairy, hydrogels, plants, and meat. The roles of additives in these inks are then discussed, followed by the remaining challenges and potential opportunities in 3D food printing.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17452759.2019.1603508

Cites

0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The dyeing process involving natural dyes typically follows three main steps: adsorption, penetration, and fixation.

    “The dyeing process involving natural dyes typically follows three main steps: adsorption, penetration, and fixation[11-15].”

    From EXPLOITING ECO-FRIENDLY NATURAL DYES FROM PLANT SOURCES: EXTRACTION AND DIVERSE APPLICATIONS (2024) · cites this paper as [13]

    The Introduction and “Non-natively extrudable” sections discuss food inks and their preparation, not natural-dye dyeing. Searches for natural dyes and for the proposed adsorption, penetration, and fixation steps found no passage addressing the claim. Page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.75)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 63

  1. 10.1002/jsfa.9226 · DOI
  2. 10.1007/s11483-018-9531-x · DOI
  3. 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.11.017 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.09.011 · DOI
  5. 10.1515/ijfe-2017-0297 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1016/j.tifs.2018.03.018 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s11947-018-2159-5 · DOI
  8. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.05.015 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1080/10408398.2018.1481823 · DOI
  10. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2016.01.025 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00008-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/17452751003753212 · DOI
  13. 10.1089/3dp.2018.0042 · DOI
  14. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.06.008 · DOI
  15. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00009-2 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.07.064 · DOI
  17. 10.1080/10408398.2018.1514363 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.04.029 · DOI
  19. Khot, R. A., D. Aggarwal, R. Pennings, L. Hjorth, and F. “Floyd” Mueller. 2017. “EdiPulse: Investigating a Playful Approach to Self-monitoring through 3D Printed Chocolate Treats.” Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems - CHI ‘17, 6593–6607, Denver, CO. doi: 10.1145/3025453.3025980 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.017 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.11.019 · DOI
  22. 10.1111/1750-3841.14391 · DOI
  23. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00006-7 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.06.029 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.003 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.034 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1016/j.tifs.2015.02.004 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2018.08.026 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.05.075 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.07.018 · DOI
  31. 10.1007/s11947-018-2209-z · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.053 · DOI
  33. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00002-X · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.06.048 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.08.018 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.04.017 · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.06.014 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.12.034 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.09.012 · DOI
  40. 10.1016/j.foodres.2019.01.056 · DOI
  41. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00005-5 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/B978-0-12-814564-7.00007-9 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.004 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.01.034 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1016/j.ifset.2016.10.001 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.08.025 · DOI
  47. Sun J., 2015, International Journal of Bioprinting, 1, 27, 10.18063/IJB.2015.01.006 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/jfpe.12934 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.08.017 · DOI
  50. 10.18063/ijb.v4i2.143 · DOI
  51. 10.18063/IJB.2017.02.009 · DOI
  52. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.12.003 · DOI
  53. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.03.010 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.ifset.2017.06.011 · DOI
  55. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.01.008 · DOI · Paper page
  56. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.02.029 · DOI
  57. 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2018.10.033 · DOI
  58. 10.1016/j.lwt.2018.12.031 · DOI
  59. 10.1080/10408398.2015.1094732 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.054 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1111/ijfs.13904 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.ifset.2018.01.001 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/j.foostr.2018.10.002 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Voon, S. L., An, J., Wong, G., Zhang, Y., & Chua, C. K.
Affiliations
  • Nanyang Technological University (SG)
  • Khoo Teck Puat Hospital (SG)
Corresponding author
Voon, Siew Li
Venue
Virtual and Physical Prototyping
Published
2019-04-15
Volume
14
Issue
3
Pages
203-218
ISSN
  • 1745-2759 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2767
OpenAlex
W2935797592
Cited by
175
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 5
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Virtual and Physical Prototyping (publishedVersion)
  • DR-NTU (Nanyang Technological University) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Research Foundation Singapore (501100001381)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
Keywords
3D food printing, edible ink, extrusion-based printing, edible materials, chocolate, confectionery, dairy products, hydrogels, rheological properties, mechanical properties, additives

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review