Cited by 40

Modifying structural and techno-functional properties of quinoa proteins through extraction techniques and modification methods

Wang, Shuyang, Miao, Song, Sun, Da-Wen·2024·Trends in Food Science & Technology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tifs.2023.104285

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quinoa shows genotype- and process-dependent variation, with reported lysine, leucine and threonine values varying across genotypes and extraction conditions.

    “Quinoa also shows genotypeand process-dependent variation, with reported lysine, leucine and threonine values varying across genotypes and extraction conditions”
  • Because saponins are amphiphilic glycosides, they may act as surface-active co-components that compete with proteins at air-water or oil-water interfaces, reduce interfacial tension, or alter the composition of mixed interfacial films.

    “Because saponins are amphiphilic glycosides, they may act as surface-active co-components that compete with proteins at air-water or oil-water interfaces, reduce interfacial tension, or alter the composition of mixed interfacial films”
  • Water-based extraction and mechanically assisted extraction offer a more targeted route for preserving functionality, but they involve trade-offs between extraction yield, protein purity, and retained co-components.

    “Water-based extraction and mechanically assisted extraction offer a more targeted route for preserving functionality, but they involve trade-offs between extraction yield, protein purity, and retained co-components (Wang et al., 2024).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review