The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Maintenance of ancestral complexity and non-metazoan genes in two basal cnidarians
Abstract
Cnidarians are among the simplest extant animals; however EST analyses reveal that they have a remarkably high level of genetic complexity. In this article, we show that the full diversity of metazoan signaling pathways is represented in this phylum, as are antagonists previously known only in chordates. Many of the cnidarian ESTs match genes previously known only in non-animal kingdoms. At least some of these represent ancient genes lost by all bilaterians examined so far, rather than genes gained by recent lateral gene transfer.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Nematostella has a surprisingly complex genome, including all major signalling pathways and most transcription factor families [18,20–24].”
From Evolution of eumetazoan nervous systems: insights from cnidarians (2015) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“diverged organisms characterized by high levels of gene loss and sequence divergence, whereas at least some cnidarians have retained much of the ancestral genetic complexity of metazoans [108–110].”
From Back to the Basics: Cnidarians Start to Fire (2017) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“Reflecting this ancestral core, cnidarian genes are often more similar to vertebrate genes than vertebrate genes are to those of more diverged animals like Caenorhabditis or Drosophila [50,109].”
From Back to the Basics: Cnidarians Start to Fire (2017) · cites this paper as [109]
In the citing paper
“the anemone genome harbors two families of Tx1-like non-LTR retrotransposons, Tx1-1_NV and Tx1-2_NV, inserted in 5S rRNA and U2 smRNA, respectively, at target sites identical to those of different Tx1 elements in fish (18), frog and lancelet.”
From Sea Anemone Genome Reveals Ancestral Eumetazoan Gene Repertoire and Genomic Organization (2007) · cites this paper as [18]
Citations
Cites
Basic local alignment search tool
Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W., & Lipman, D. J. (1990) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1990.9999 · Cited by 98,669
Krogh, A., Larsson, B., von Heijne, G., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2001) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2000.4315 · Cited by 12,654
CAP3: A DNA Sequence Assembly Program
Huang, X., & Madan, A. (1999) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · Cited by 5,261
The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource
Gene Ontology Consortium (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkh036 · Cited by 4,596
The SWISS-PROT protein knowledgebase and its supplement TrEMBL in 2003
Boeckmann, B. (2003) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkg095 · Cited by 3,911
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt)
Bairoch, A. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki070 · Cited by 3,774
TREE-PUZZLE: maximum likelihood phylogenetic analysis using quartets and parallel computing
Schmidt, H. A., Strimmer, K., Vingron, M., & von Haeseler, A. (2002) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/18.3.502 · Cited by 2,512
A Combined Transmembrane Topology and Signal Peptide Prediction Method
Käll, L., Krogh, A., & Sonnhammer, E. L. L. (2004) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.016 · Cited by 2,474
Inparanoid: a comprehensive database of eukaryotic orthologs
O'Brien, K. P. (2004) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gki107 · Cited by 731
MOLPHY version 2.3 : programs for molecular phylogenetics based on maximum likelihood
Adachi, J. (1996) · Cited by 605
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sea Anemone Genome Reveals Ancestral Eumetazoan Gene Repertoire and Genomic Organization
Putnam, N. H., Srivastava, M., Hellsten, U., Dirks, B., Chapman, J., Salamov, A., Terry, A., Shapiro, H., Lindquist, E., Kapitonov, V. V., et al. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1139158 · Cited by 1,555
Self-citationChapman, J. A., Kirkness, E. F., Simakov, O., Hampson, S. E., Mitros, T., Weinmaier, T., Rattei, T., Balasubramanian, P. G., Borman, J., Busam, D., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08830 · Cited by 810
Self-citationThe frailty of adaptive hypotheses for the origins of organismal complexity
Lynch, M. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0702207104 · Cited by 829
Albalat, R., & Cañestro, C. (2016) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg.2016.39 · Cited by 775
The relationship between non‐protein‐coding DNA and eukaryotic complexity
Taft, R. J., Pheasant, M., & Mattick, J. S. (2007) · BioEssays · doi:10.1002/bies.20544 · Cited by 731
Metadata
- Authors
- Technau, U., Rudd, S., Maxwell, P., Gordon, P. M. K., Saina, M., Grasso, L. C., Hayward, D. C., Sensen, C. W., Saint, R., Holstein, T. W., Ball, E. E., & Miller, D. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bergen (NO)
- Turku Centre for Biotechnology (FI)
- Australian National University (AU)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- Heidelberg University (DE)
- James Cook University (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Technau, Ulrich
- Miller, David J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Trends in Genetics
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 633-639
- ISSN
- 0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2076271968
- Cited by
- 337
- References
- 49
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 4.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ResearchOnline at James Cook University (James Cook University) (submittedVersion)
- Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
- ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
- Keywords
- ancestral genes, gene loss, horizontal gene transfer, expressed sequence tags, gene family evolution, bilaterians
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Bacterial Proteins, Genetics, Population, Heat-Shock Proteins, Humans, Phylogeny, Genes, Duplicate, Anthozoa
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review