Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 381

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 84 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

What controls nucleosome positions?

Open access
Segal, Eran, Widom, Jonathan·2009·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

The DNA of eukaryotic genomes is wrapped in nucleosomes, which strongly distort and occlude the DNA from access to most DNA-binding proteins. An understanding of the mechanisms that control nucleosome positioning along the DNA is thus essential to understanding the binding and action of proteins that carry out essential genetic functions. New genome-wide data on in vivo and in vitro nucleosome positioning greatly advance our understanding of several factors that can influence nucleosome positioning, including DNA sequence preferences, DNA methylation, histone variants and post-translational modifications, higher order chromatin structure, and the actions of transcription factors, chromatin remodelers and other DNA-binding proteins. We discuss how these factors function and ways in which they might be integrated into a unified framework that accounts for both the preservation of nucleosome positioning and the dynamic nucleosome repositioning that occur across biological conditions, cell types, developmental processes and disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2009.06.002

Cites

84 of 84 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 84 references

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. Thåström, 2004, Nucleosomal locations of dominant DNA sequence motifs for histone-DNA interactions and nucleosome positioning, J. Mol. Biol., 338, 695, 10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.032 · doi:10.1016/j.jmb.2004.03.032
  2. Zhurkin, 1979, Anisotropic flexibility of DNA and the nucleosomal structure, Nucleic Acids Res., 6, 1081, 10.1093/nar/6.3.1081 · doi:10.1093/nar/6.3.1081
  3. Nathan, 2002, Bending and flexibility of methylated and unmethylated EcoRI DNA, J. Mol. Biol., 316, 7, 10.1006/jmbi.2001.5247 · doi:10.1006/jmbi.2001.5247
  4. Yang, 2007, The core histone tail domains contribute to sequence-dependent nucleosome positioning, J. Biol. Chem., 282, 7930, 10.1074/jbc.M610584200 · doi:10.1074/jbc.m610584200
  5. Widom, 1998, Chromatin structure: linking structure to function with histone H1, Curr. Biol., 8, R788, 10.1016/S0960-9822(07)00500-3 · doi:10.1016/s0960-9822(07)00500-3
  6. Weintraub, 1978, The nucleosome repeat length increases during erythropoiesis in the chick, Nucleic Acids Res., 5, 1179, 10.1093/nar/5.4.1179 · doi:10.1093/nar/5.4.1179
  7. Schwab, 2008, Nucleosome switches, Phys. Rev. Lett., 100, 228105, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.228105 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.100.228105
  8. Ulanovsky, L. and Trifonov, E. (1986) A different View Point on the Chromatin Higher Order Structure: Steric Exclusion Effects. Biomolecular Stereodynamics III. Proceedings of the Fourth Conversation in the Discipline Biomolecular Stereodynamics, Albany, NY, June 04-09, 1985, 35-44
  9. Mangenot, 2002, Salt-induced conformation and interaction changes of nucleosome core particles, Biophys. J., 82, 345, 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75399-X · doi:10.1016/s0006-3495(02)75399-x
  10. Bertin, 2004, Role of histone tails in the conformation and interactions of nucleosome core particles, Biochemistry, 43, 4773, 10.1021/bi036210g · doi:10.1021/bi036210g
  11. Davey, 1995, Periodicity of strong nucleosome positioning sites around the chicken adult β-globin gene may encode regularly spaced chromatin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 92, 11210, 10.1073/pnas.92.24.11210 · doi:10.1073/pnas.92.24.11210
  12. Lohr, 1979, Organization of spacer DNA in chromatin, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 76, 6326, 10.1073/pnas.76.12.6326 · doi:10.1073/pnas.76.12.6326
  13. Wang, 2008, Preferentially quantized linker DNA lengths in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, PLOS Comput. Biol., 4, e1000175, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000175 · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000175
  14. Parkhurst, 1999, Intermediate species possessing bent DNA are present along the pathway to formation of a final TBP-TATA complex, J. Mol. Biol., 289, 1327, 10.1006/jmbi.1999.2835 · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1999.2835
  15. Auble, 1997, Molecular analysis of the SNF2/SWI2 protein family member MOT1, an ATP-driven enzyme that dissociates TATA-binding protein from DNA, Mol. Cell. Biol., 17, 4842, 10.1128/MCB.17.8.4842 · doi:10.1128/mcb.17.8.4842

Cited by

See all 381

Metadata

Authors
Segal, E., & Widom, J.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-08
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
335-343
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060789589
Cited by
381
References
84
FWCI
2.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What controls nucleosome positions? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tig.2009.06.002
The paper
Segal, E., & Widom, J. (2009). What controls nucleosome positions? Trends in Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2009.06.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.