Cited by 350RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Alternative mRNA transcription, processing, and translation: insights from RNA sequencing

de Klerk, Eleonora, ‘t Hoen, Peter A.C.·2015·Trends in Genetics

Abstract

The human transcriptome comprises >80,000 protein-coding transcripts and the estimated number of proteins synthesized from these transcripts is in the range of 250,000 to 1 million. These transcripts and proteins are encoded by less than 20,000 genes, suggesting extensive regulation at the transcriptional, post-transcriptional, and translational level. Here we review how RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) technologies have increased our understanding of the mechanisms that give rise to alternative transcripts and their alternative translation. We highlight four different regulatory processes: alternative transcription initiation, alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation, and alternative translation initiation. We discuss their transcriptome-wide distribution, their impact on protein expression, their biological relevance, and the possible molecular mechanisms leading to their alternative regulation. We conclude with a discussion of the coordination and the interdependence of these four regulatory layers.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2015.01.001

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Klerk, E., & ‘t Hoen, P. A. C.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-03
Volume
31
Issue
3
Pages
128-139
ISSN
0168-9525 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2026141529
Cited by
350
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 37 · 2015: 20 · 2012: 1
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
alternative splicing, alternative polyadenylation, alternative transcription initiation, alternative translation initiation, splice variants, transcriptome, post-transcriptional regulation, translational regulation, protein expression, RNA-seq
MeSH terms
Humans, Promoter Regions, Genetic, RNA, Messenger, Transcription, Genetic, Protein Biosynthesis, Alternative Splicing, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Gene Expression Profiling, Polyadenylation, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Transcriptome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review