Cited by 1,480RNA Research and SplicingRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsRNA regulation and disease

A compendium of RNA-binding motifs for decoding gene regulation

Open access
Ray, Debashish, Kazan, Hilal, Cook, Kate B., Weirauch, Matthew T., Najafabadi, Hamed S., Li, Xiao, Gueroussov, Serge, Albu, Mihai +27 more·2013·Nature

Abstract

RNA-binding proteins are key regulators of gene expression, yet only a small fraction have been functionally characterized. Here we report a systematic analysis of the RNA motifs recognized by RNA-binding proteins, encompassing 205 distinct genes from 24 diverse eukaryotes. The sequence specificities of RNA-binding proteins display deep evolutionary conservation, and the recognition preferences for a large fraction of metazoan RNA-binding proteins can thus be inferred from their RNA-binding domain sequence. The motifs that we identify in vitro correlate well with in vivo RNA-binding data. Moreover, we can associate them with distinct functional roles in diverse types of post-transcriptional regulation, enabling new insights into the functions of RNA-binding proteins both in normal physiology and in human disease. These data provide an unprecedented overview of RNA-binding proteins and their targets, and constitute an invaluable resource for determining post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms in eukaryotes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nature12311

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 44 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Among the 207 RBPs initially analyzed, most yielded RNA-binding data distinct from all other proteins.

    “Among the 207 RBPs we initially analysed, most yielded RNA-binding data distinct from that obtained from all other proteins”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    RNAcompete motifs are predictive of RNA sequences bound by the same proteins or their close homologues in vivo.

    “However, RNAcompete motifs are predictive of RNA sequences bound by the same proteins (or their close homologues) in vivo”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingnone given

    The in vitro motifs identified correlate well with in vivo RNA-binding data.

    “The motifs that we identify in vitro correlate well with in vivo RNA-binding data.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    In almost all cases, E scores for 7-mers from the two halves of the RNAcompete pool for a given protein are more similar to each other than to those of other assayed proteins.

    “In almost all cases, E scores for 7-mers from the two halves of the RNAcompete pool for a given protein are more similar to each other than to those of other assayed proteins”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    The authors systematically analyzed RNA motifs recognized by RBPs, covering 205 distinct genes from 24 diverse eukaryotes.

    “Here we report a systematic analysis of the RNA motifs recognized by RNA-binding proteins, encompassing 205 distinct genes from 24 diverse eukaryotes.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 20
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 6
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The authors initially determined sequence preferences for 207 RBPs, representing seven structural classes and 193 unique RBP-encoding genes.

    “We initially determined the sequence preferences for 207 different RBPs, corresponding to seven different structural classes and representing the products of 193 unique RBP-encoding genes”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The vast majority of RBPs appear to bind target sequences in single-stranded RNA, and none absolutely requires a specific RNA secondary structure, although 22 RBPs show significant preference for (n=7) or against (n=15) predicted hairpin loops.

    “The vast majority of RBPs appear to bind target sequences in ssRNA, and none absolutely requires a specific RNA secondary structure, although 22 RBPs display a significant preference for (n = 7) or against (n = 15) predicted hairpin loops”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The analyzed RBPs included 85 human, 61 Drosophila, and 61 from 18 other eukaryotes chosen to be dissimilar to already profiled RBPs.

    “The analysed RBPs included 85 from human, 61 from Drosophila and an additional 61 from 18 other eukaryotes selected to be dissimilar to already profiled RBPs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Most of these 52 RBPs have obvious similarity to RNAcompete-derived motifs, with 35 very similar, six partial matches, and 11 discrepancies.

    “Most of these have obvious similarity to our RNAcompete-derived motifs (Supplementary Data 5; 35 very similar, six partial matches, and 11 discrepancies).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    RBFOX1, RBFOX2, and RBFOX3 motifs are conserved in introns downstream of alternative exons, whereas PUM1 and PUM2 sites are most highly conserved in 3' UTRs.

    “motifs for the alternative splicing factorsRBFOX1, RBFOX2 and RBFOX3 (ref. 4) are conserved in introns downstream of alternative exons, whereas sites for the stability/translation factors PUM1 and PUM2 are most highly conserved in 3′ UTRs24,25”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [4] Gabut, M., Chaudhry, S. & Blencowe, B. J. SnapShot: The splicing regulatory machinery. Cell 133, 192.e1 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [24] Yeo, G. W. et al. An RNA code for the FOX2 splicing regulator revealed by mapping RNA-protein interactions in stem cells. Nature Struct. Mol. Biol. 16, 130–137 (2009) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [25] Morris, A. R., Mukherjee, N. & Keene, J. D. Ribonomic analysis of human Pum1 reveals cis-trans conservation across species despite evolution of diverse mRNA target sets. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28, 4093–4103 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    The analysis identified known regulators of mRNA stability, including RBM4 and ELAVL1, and correctly predicted the direction of their effect (destabilizing for RBM4 and stabilizing for ELAVL1).

    “This analysis identified several known regulators of mRNA stability, including RBM4 and ELAVL1 (refs 31, 32), and correctly predicted the direction of their effect (destabilizing for RBM4 and stabilizing for ELAVL1”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [31] Markus, M. A. & Morris, B. J. RBM4: a multifunctional RNA-binding protein. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 41, 740–743 (2009) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [32] Myer, V. E., Fan, X. C. & Steitz, J. A. Identification of HuR as a protein implicated in AUUUA-mediated mRNA decay. EMBO J. 16, 2130–2139 (1997) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Very different motifs have been previously described for different HNRNPA family members from human and Drosophila, whereas RNAcompete motifs for the same proteins are closely related.

    “very different motifs have been previously described for different HNRNPA family members from human and Drosophila19–22, whereas the RNAcompete motifs for the same proteins are closely related”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 4 sources checked
    • cites [19] Huelga, S. C. et al. Integrative genome-wide analysis reveals cooperative regulation of alternative splicing by hnRNP proteins. Cell Rep. 1, 167–178 (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [20] Burd, C. G. & Dreyfuss, G. RNA binding specificity of hnRNP A1: significance of hnRNP A1 high-affinity binding sites in pre-mRNA splicing. EMBO J. 13, 1197–1204 (1994) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] Blanchette, M. et al. Genome-wide analysis of alternative pre-mRNA splicing and RNA-binding specificities of the Drosophila hnRNP A/B family members. Mol. Cell 33, 438–449 (2009) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [22] Goodarzi, H. et al. Systematic discovery of structural elements governing stability of mammalian messenger RNAs. Nature 485, 264–268 (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingcitation

    Family members of SNRPA/SNF from fungi, protists, and algae have maintained the presumed ancestral CAC core-recognition specificity but differ in flanking nucleotide preference.

    “family members from fungi, protists and algae have all maintained the presumed ancestral CAC core-recognition specificity17, but differ in their preference for flanking nucleotides”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [17] Stefl, R., Skrisovska, L. & Allain, F. H. RNA sequence- and shape-dependent recognition by proteins in the ribonucleoprotein particle. EMBO Rep. 6, 33–38 (2005) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    These fragments succeeded more often than full-length proteins or individual RBDs in trial experiments and produced data consistent with previously known motifs.

    “These fragments succeed more often than full-length proteins or individual RBDs in trial experiments (Supplementary Table 1) and yield data that are consistent with previously known motifs”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In some cases, DNA-binding motifs can be predicted from specific interactions between DNA-contacting amino acid residues and DNA bases.

    “in some cases motifs can even be predicted on the basis of specific interactions between DNA-contacting amino acid residues and DNA bases9,10”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [9] Christensen, R. G. et al. Recognition models to predict DNA-binding specificities of homeodomain proteins. Bioinformatics 28, i84–i89 (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [10] Liu, J. & Stormo, G. D. Context-dependent DNA recognition code for C2H2 zinc-finger transcription factors. Bioinformatics 24, 1850–1857 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Motifs for DNA-binding proteins can be highly similar among closely related proteins, allowing accurate inference of motifs.

    “The motifs for DNA-binding proteins can be highly similar for closely related proteins, allowing accurate inference of motifs7,8”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] Noyes, M. B. et al. Analysis of homeodomain specificities allows the family-wide prediction of preferred recognition sites. Cell 133, 1277–1289 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Berger, M. F. et al. Variation in homeodomain DNA binding revealed by high-resolution analysis of sequence preferences. Cell 133, 1266–1276 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Collectively, RNAcompete motifs are generally both accurate and functionally relevant.

    “Collectively, these analyses demonstrate that the RNAcompete motifs are generally both accurate and functionally relevant.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    The SUP12, RBM24, and RBM38 proteins are regulators of muscle development in nematode, mouse, and human, indicating biochemical and functional conservation.

    “These nematode, mouse and human proteins are regulators of muscle development15,16, indicating both biochemical and functional conservation.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [15] Miyamoto, S., Hidaka, K., Jin, D. & Morisaki, T. RNA-binding proteins Rbm38 and Rbm24 regulate myogenic differentiation via p21-dependent and -independent regulatory pathways. Genes Cells 14, 1241–1252 (2009) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [16] Anyanful, A. et al. The RNA-binding protein SUP-12 controls muscle-specific splicing of the ADF/cofilin pre-mRNA in C. elegans . J. Cell Biol. 167, 639–647 (2004) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    RNA-binding proteins control many steps of co- and post-transcriptional gene expression, such as splicing, polyadenylation, capping, modification, export, localization, translation, and turnover.

    “RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) regulate numerous aspects of co- and post-transcriptional gene expression, including RNA splicing, polyadenylation, capping, modification, export, localization, translation and turnover1,2.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Glisovic, T., Bachorik, J. L., Yong, J. & Dreyfuss, G. RNA-binding proteins and post-transcriptional gene regulation. FEBS Lett. 582, 1977–1986 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Keene, J. D. RNA regulons: coordination of post-transcriptional events. Nature Rev. Genet. 8, 533–543 (2007) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Canonical RBDs typically bind short single-stranded RNA sequences, but some also recognize structured RNAs.

    “Canonical RBDs typically bind short, single-stranded (ss)RNA sequences3,4, but some also recognize structured RNAs5.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [3] Cook, K. B., Kazan, H., Zuberi, K., Morris, Q. & Hughes, T. R. RBPDB: a database of RNA-binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D301–D308 (2011) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [4] Gabut, M., Chaudhry, S. & Blencowe, B. J. SnapShot: The splicing regulatory machinery. Cell 133, 192.e1 (2008) source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [5] Auweter, S. D., Oberstrass, F. C. & Allain, F. H. Sequence-specific binding of single-stranded RNA: is there a code for recognition? Nucleic Acids Res. 34, 4943–4959 (2006) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premiseown data

    Only a minority of RBD-containing proteins in eukaryotic genomes have been studied in detail, and the assays used to generate their motifs are heterogeneous.

    “A minority of the thousands of RBD-containing proteins in eukaryotic genomes have been studied in detail, and the assays used to generate the motifs are heterogeneous.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    The RNA pool was split into two halves for internal cross-validation, with each half containing at least eight copies of every 9-mer, 33 copies of each 8-mer, and 155 copies of each 7-mer.

    “For internal cross-validation, the pool was divided into two halves, each of which contained at least eight copies of all possible 9-mers, 33 copies of each 8-mer, and 155 copies of each 7-mer.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The human genome encodes 239 RRM-domain proteins and 38 KH-domain proteins among 424 known and predicted RBPs.

    “The human genome, for example, encodes 239 proteins with RRM domains and 38 with KH domains, among a total of 424 known and predicted RBPs3.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Cook, K. B., Kazan, H., Zuberi, K., Morris, Q. & Hughes, T. R. RBPDB: a database of RNA-binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D301–D308 (2011) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Known RNA-binding motifs exist for 15% of human, 8% of Drosophila, and 3% of Caenorhabditis elegans RBD-containing proteins.

    “For example, 15% of human, 8% of Drosophila and 3% of Caenorhabditis elegans RBD-containing proteins have known RNA-binding motifs3”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [3] Cook, K. B., Kazan, H., Zuberi, K., Morris, Q. & Hughes, T. R. RBPDB: a database of RNA-binding specificities. Nucleic Acids Res. 39, D301–D308 (2011) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The analyses indicated previously unanticipated roles in alternative splicing and/or mRNA stability for known RBPs with well-defined sequence preferences as well as for uncharacterized RBPs.

    “Collectively, these analyses indicated previously unanticipated roles in alternative splicing and/or mRNA stability for known RBPs with well-defined sequence preferences as well as for uncharacterized RBPs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Interpretationnone given

    The marked change in the central UCAC in the T. brucei consensus (HUUCACR) seems to correspond to the unusual T. brucei U1 loop sequence (CAUCAC versus AUUGCAC in most other species).

    “The marked change in the central ‘UCAC’ in the unusual consensus in Trypanosoma brucei (HUUCACR) seems to correspond to the unusual T. brucei U1 loop sequence (CAUCAC versus AUUGCAC in most other species).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    For PUM1 and PUM2, the predicted direction of effect was counter to expectation, indicating that correlation may reflect possible additional functional roles for these proteins and/or their binding motifs.

    “In other cases (for example, PUM1 and PUM2), the direction of the effect was counter to expectation33, indicating that correlation may reflect possible additional functional roles for these proteins and/or their binding motifs.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [33] Van Etten, J. et al. Human Pumilio proteins recruit multiple deadenylases to efficiently repress messenger RNAs. J. Biol. Chem. 287, 36370–36383 (2012) source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The analyses show that RBP motifs can be readily used to infer human post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms, and can explain evolutionary constraints found within both coding and non-coding regions of transcripts.

    “The analyses above show that RBP motifs can be readily used to infer human post-transcriptional regulation mechanisms, and can explain evolutionary constraints found within both coding and non-coding regions of transcripts.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    RBP multi-functionality may be more widespread than previously appreciated; motifs for most (38 out of 49) RBP families shown display significant conservation in more than one of the three regions examined.

    “This analysis suggests that RBP multi-functionality may be more widespread than previously appreciated; motifs for most (38 out of 49) RBP families shown in Fig. 4a display significant conservation in more than one of the three regions examined.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
24 of 24
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    A closely related RNA motif will be bound by any protein that has more than 70% sequence identity in its RBDs to those in one of the 207 proteins analyzed.

    “If we assume that a closely related RNA motif will be bound by any protein that has >70% sequence identity in its RBDs to those in one of the 207 proteins that we analysed”
1 of 1

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational analysis suggested that the miR-140-5p-G seed in the Ago2 complex and the RBP Ybx1 potentially compete for the same RNA binding sites.

    “Computational analysis suggested that the miR-140-5p-G seed in the Ago2 complex and the RBP, Ybx1 (also known as YB-1), potentially compete for the same RNA binding sites”

    From Gain-of-function mutation of microRNA-140 in human skeletal dysplasia (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Large-scale analysis of RBPs section describes computational analysis of RBP binding motifs, but does not address competition between Ybx1 and an Ago2-bound microRNA. Searches for YBX1, miR-140-5p, and overlapping Ago2/RBP binding sites found no passage supporting the specific claim. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Ybx1 seCLIP analysis identified a binding motif similar to the Ybx1 binding motif reported previously.

    “Next, Ybx1 seCLIP analysis identified a binding motif similar to the Ybx1 binding motif reported previously30–32”

    From Gain-of-function mutation of microRNA-140 in human skeletal dysplasia (2019) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Large-scale analysis of RBPs section describes how the paper derived RNA-binding motifs, but the passages found do not identify a YBX1 motif. Searches for “YBX1,” “YB-1,” and “Y-box binding protein 1” found no passage establishing the specific motif comparison attributed to this source. (LLM, conf=0.72)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Recent findings propose that Rbfox can also regulate alternative polyadenylation and mRNA stability, based on analysis of Rbfox motif sites in 3′ UTRs correlated with transcript abundance in different tissues.

    “Several recent findingspropose that Rbfox can also regulate alternative polyadenylation (Wang et al., 2008) and mRNA stability (Ray et al., 2013), based on analysis of Rbfox motif sites in 3′ UTRs that are correlated with transcript abundance in different tissues.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ray, D., Kazan, H., Cook, K. B., Weirauch, M. T., Najafabadi, H. S., Li, X., Gueroussov, S., Albu, M., Zheng, H., Yang, A., Na, H., Irimia, M., Matzat, L. H., Dale, R. K., Smith, S. A., Yarosh, C. A., Kelly, S. M., Nabet, B., Mecenas, D., Li, W., Laishram, R. S., Qiao, M., Lipshitz, H. D., Piano, F., Corbett, A. H., Carstens, R. P., Frey, B. J., Anderson, R. A., Lynch, K. W., Penalva, L. O. F., Lei, E. P., Fraser, A. G., Blencowe, B. J., Morris, Q. D., & Hughes, T. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
  • Morris, Quaid D.
  • Hughes, Timothy R.
Venue
Nature
Published
2013-07
Volume
499
Issue
7457
Pages
172-177
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W2105694586
Cited by
1,480
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 71 · 2025: 85 · 2024: 130 · 2023: 98 · 2022: 118 · 2021: 135 · 2020: 118 · 2019: 129 · 2018: 131 · 2017: 119 · 2016: 108 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 106 · 2013: 24
FWCI
51.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research (125894_1, 93671_1, MOP-49451, MOP-14409, MOP-67011)
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (1R01HG00570, R01HG005700)
  • National Cancer Institute (R01CA104708, P30CA014520)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM084034, R01GM058728, R01GM051968, R01GM114386, T32GM008061)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (Z01DK015602, DK015602-05)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Research and Splicing
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA regulation and disease
Keywords
RNA-binding proteins, RNA-binding motif, post-transcriptional regulation, RNA-binding domain, sequence specificity, evolutionary conservation, interaction site prediction, eukaryotic gene regulation
MeSH terms
RNA Splicing Factors, Autistic Disorder, Base Sequence, Binding Sites, Eukaryotic Cells, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Molecular Sequence Data, RNA-Binding Proteins, Conserved Sequence, Protein Structure, Tertiary, RNA Stability, Nucleotide Motifs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review