CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 248

miRNA Targeting: Growing beyond the Seed

Chipman, Laura B., Pasquinelli, Amy E.·2019·Trends in Genetics
DOI 10.1016/j.tig.2018.12.005PMC PMC7083087
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tig.2018.12.005

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional pairing between nucleotides in the 3' half of the miRNA and the target mRNA also contributes to miRNA-mediated gene targeting.

    “Additional pairing between nucleotides in the 3′ half of the miRNA and the target mRNA also contribute to miRNA‐mediated gene targeting (reviewed in Chipman & Pasquinelli, 2019).”

    From microRNA strand selection: Unwinding the rules (2021) · cites this paper as Chipman & Pasquinelli, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. [3]Kozomara A (2018) miRBase: from microRNA sequences to function. Nucleic Acids Res. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gky1141 PMC6323917 30423142 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [4]Bartel DP (2018) Metazoan MicroRNAs. Cell 173, 20– 51 29570994 PMC6091663
  3. [5]Liu H (2018) Small but powerful: function of microRNAs in plant development. Plant Cell Rep. 37, 515– 528 29318384
  4. [7]Gebert LFR and MacRae IJ (2018) Regulation of microRNA function in animals. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol DOI: 10.1038/s41580-018-0045-7 PMC6546304 30108335 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [8]Elkayam E (2012) The structure of human argonaute-2 in complex with miR-20a. Cell 150, 100– 110 22682761 PMC3464090
  6. [9]Nakanishi K (2012) Structure of yeast Argonaute with guide RNA. Nature 486, 368– 374 22722195 PMC3853139
  7. [10]Schirle NT and MacRae IJ (2012) The Crystal Structure of Human Argonaute2. Science 336, 1037– 1040 22539551 PMC3521581
  8. [11]Chandradoss SD (2015) A Dynamic Search Process Underlies MicroRNA Targeting. Cell 162, 96– 107 26140593 PMC4768356
  9. [12]Jo MH (2015) Human Argonaute 2 Has Diverse Reaction Pathways on Target RNAs. Mol. Cell 59, 117– 124 26140367
  10. [13]Salomon WE (2015) Single-Molecule Imaging Reveals that Argonaute Reshapes the Binding Properties of Its Nucleic Acid Guides. Cell 162, 84– 95 26140592 PMC4503223
  11. [14]Schirle NT (2014) Structural basis for microRNA targeting. Science 346, 608– 13 25359968 PMC4313529
  12. [15]Yan Y (2018) The sequence features that define efficient and specific hAGO2-dependent miRNA silencing guides. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 8181– 8196 30239883 PMC6144789
  13. [16]Helwak A (2013) Mapping the human miRNA interactome by CLASH reveals frequent noncanonical binding. Cell 153, 654– 665 23622248 PMC3650559
  14. [17]Grosswendt S (2014) Unambiguous Identification of miRNA: Target site interactions by different types of ligation reactions. Mol. Cell 54, 1042– 1054 24857550 PMC4181535
  15. [20]Reinhart BJ (2000) The 21-nucleotide let-7 RNA regulates developmental timing in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nature 403, 901– 906 10706289
  16. [21]Slack FJ (2000) The lin-41 RBCC Gene Acts in the C. elegans Heterochronic Pathway between the let-7 Regulatory RNA and the LIN-29 Transcription Factor. Molecular 5, 659– 669 10882102
  17. [22]Brancati G and Großhans H (2018) An interplay of miRNA abundance and target site architecture determines miRNA activity and specificity. Nucleic Acids Res. 46, 3259– 3269 29897601 PMC5909448
  18. [23]Chi SW (2009) Argonaute HITS-CLIP decodes microRNA – mRNA interaction maps. Nature 460, 479– 486 19536157 PMC2733940
  19. [24]Hafner M (2010) Transcriptome-wide Identification of RNA-Binding Protein and MicroRNA Target Sites by PAR-CLIP. Cell 141, 129– 141 20371350 PMC2861495
  20. [25]Zisoulis DG (2010) Comprehensive discovery of endogenous Argonaute binding sites in Caenorhabditis elegans. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 17, 173– 179 20062054 PMC2834287
  21. [27]Duursma AM (2008) miR-148 targets human DNMT3b protein coding region. RNA 14, 872– 7 18367714 PMC2327368
  22. [28]Tay Y (2008) MicroRNAs to Nanog, Oct4 and Sox2 coding regions modulate embryonic stem cell differentiation. Nature 455, 1124– 1128 18806776
  23. [29]Hausser J (2013) Analysis of CDS-located miRNA target sites suggests that they can effectively inhibit translation. Genome Res. 23, 604– 615 23335364 PMC3613578
  24. [30]Gu S (2009) Biological basis for restriction of microRNA targets to the 3′ untranslated region in mammalian mRNAs. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 16, 144– 150 19182800 PMC2713750
  25. [31]Zhang K (2018) A novel class of microRNA-recognition elements that function only within open reading frames. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol DOI: 10.1038/s41594-018-0136-3 PMC6219929 30297778 · DOI
  26. [32]Cai Z (2015) Oncogenic miR-17/20a forms a positive feed-forward loop with the p53 kinase DAPK3 to promote tumorigenesis. J. Biol. Chem 290, 19967– 19975 26117336 PMC4528155
  27. [33]Ameres SL (2010) Target RNA-directed trimming and tailing of small silencing RNAs. Science 328, 1534– 9 20558712 PMC2902985
  28. [34]Cazalla D (2010) Down-regulation of a host microRNA by a Herpesvirus saimiri noncoding RNA. Science 328, 1563– 6 20558719 PMC3075239
  29. [35]Fuchs Wightman F (2018) Target RNAs strike back on microRNAs. Front. Genet 9, 435 30333855 PMC6175985
  30. [36]Baccarini A (2011) Kinetic analysis reveals the fate of a MicroRNA following target regulation in mammalian cells. Curr. Biol 21, 369– 376 21353554 PMC3088433
  31. [37]Libri V (2012) Murine cytomegalovirus encodes a miR-27 inhibitor disguised as a target. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci 109, 279– 284 22184245 PMC3252920
  32. [38]Marcinowski L (2012) Degradation of cellular mir-27 by a novel, highly abundant viral transcript is important for efficient virus replication in vivo. PLoS Pathog. 8, e1002510 22346748 PMC3276556
  33. [39]Lee S (2013) Selective degradation of host MicroRNAs by an intergenic HCMV noncoding RNA accelerates virus production. Cell Host Microbe 13, 678– 690 23768492
  34. [40]Bitetti A (2018) MicroRNA degradation by a conserved target RNA regulates animal behavior. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol 25, 244– 251 29483647
  35. [41]Kleaveland B (2018) A Network of Noncoding Regulatory RNAs Acts in the Mammalian Brain. Cell 174, 350– 362.e17 29887379 PMC6559361
  36. [42]Ghini F (2018) Endogenous transcripts control miRNA levels and activity in mammalian cells by target-directed miRNA degradation. Nat. Commun 9, 3119 30087332 PMC6081425
  37. [43]Ulitsky I (2011) Conserved function of lincRNAs in vertebrate embryonic development despite rapid sequence evolution. Cell 147, 1537– 50 22196729 PMC3376356

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chipman, L. B., & Pasquinelli, A. E.
Venue
Trends in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-03
Volume
35
Issue
3
Pages
215-222
ISSN
0168-9525
DOI
10.1016/j.tig.2018.12.005
PMC
PMC7083087
Cited by
248
References
6
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Funders
  • National Institute of General Medicine (T32 GM007240, R35 GM127012)
  • National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship (DGE-1650112)
  • National Institute on Aging (R01 AG056562)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review