Cited by 1,334Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsBarrier Structure and Function Studies

New roles for astrocytes: redefining the functional architecture of the brain.

Nedergaard, Maiken, Ransom, Bruce, Goldman, Steven A.·2003·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Astrocytes have traditionally been considered ancillary, satellite cells of the nervous system. However, work over the past decade has revealed that they interact with the vasculature to form a gliovascular network that might organize not only the structural architecture of the brain but also its communication pathways, activation, thresholds and plasticity. The net effect is that astroglia demarcate gray matter regions, both cortical and subcortical, into functional compartments whose internal activation thresholds and external outputs are regulated by single glial cells. The array of these astrocyte-delimited microdomains along the capillary microvasculature allows the formation of higher-order gliovascular units, which serve to match local neural activity and blood flow while regulating neuronal firing thresholds through coordinative glial signaling. By these means, astrocytes might establish the functional as well as the structural architecture of the adult brain.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2003.08.008

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ratio of glia to neurons likely has functional relevance and varies between different brain regions.

    “The ratio of glia to neurons likely has functional relevance (Nedergaard et al., 2003) and varies between different brain regions.”

    From Human Brain/Cloud Interface (2019) · cites this paper as Nedergaard et al., 2003

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 65 · Cited by 1,334

Authors
Nedergaard, M., Ransom, B., & Goldman, S. A.
Affiliations
  • New York Medical College (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Cornell University (US)
Corresponding author
Nedergaard, Maiken
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-10
Volume
26
Issue
10
Pages
523-530
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117088742
Cited by
1,334
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 40 · 2021: 57 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 60 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 80 · 2013: 94 · 2012: 72
FWCI
4.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
astrocytes, glial signaling, brain functional architecture
MeSH terms
Animals, Astrocytes, Blood Vessels, Brain, Cell Communication, Humans, Neurons, Calcium Signaling, Endothelial Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review