Cited by 211Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPhagocytosis and Immune Regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 125 of the 125 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microglial Phagocytosis: A Disease-Associated Process Emerging from Alzheimer’s Disease Genetics

Open access
Podleśny-Drabiniok, Anna, Marcora, Edoardo, Goate, Alison M.·2020·Trends in Neurosciences

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a debilitating, chronic neurodegenerative disease. Genetic studies involving genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and meta-analysis have discovered numerous genomic loci associated with AD; however, the causal genes and variants remain unidentified in most loci. Integration of GWAS signals with epigenomic annotations has demonstrated that AD risk variants are enriched in myeloid-specific enhancers, implicating myeloid cells in AD etiology. AD risk variants in these regulatory elements modify disease susceptibility by regulating the expression of genes that play crucial roles in microglial phagocytosis. Several of these AD risk genes are specifically expressed in myeloid cells, whereas others are ubiquitously expressed but are regulated by AD risk variants within myeloid enhancers in a cell type-specific manner. We discuss the impact of established AD risk variants on microglial phagocytosis and debris processing via the endolysosomal system.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tins.2020.10.002

Cites

125 of 125 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 123 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 211

Metadata

Authors
Podleśny-Drabiniok, A., Marcora, E., & Goate, A. M.
Affiliations
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
Corresponding author
Goate, Alison M.
Venue
Trends in Neurosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
43
Issue
12
Pages
965-979
ISSN
0166-2236 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3095321129
Cited by
211
References
123
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 24
FWCI
2.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Neurosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (U01 AG052411, RF1AG054011, U01AG058635)
  • JPB Foundation
  • Neurodegeneration Consortium
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Phagocytosis and Immune Regulation
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, microglial phagocytosis, myeloid cells, genome-wide association study, endolysosomal system, debris removal, neurodegeneration, causal genes
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Humans, Phagocytosis, Microglia, Neurodegenerative Diseases, Genome-Wide Association Study

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review