Alzheimer’s genetic risk factor CASS4 controls microglial focal adhesion biology and amyloidosis

Walsh, Adeline E., Davis, Benjamin A., Samuels, Joshua D., Mills, William A., Thanos, Jessica M., Johnson, Alexis M., Moore, Katelyn A., Puchalski, Michael A. +6 more·2026·Journal of Experimental Medicine

Abstract

Recent genome-wide association studies have identified numerous Alzheimer’s disease (AD) risk genes enriched in microglia, including Crk-associated substrate (Cas) scaffold protein family member 4 (CASS4), which encodes the adaptor protein CASS4. Despite its strong genetic association with AD, the role of CASS4 in disease remains poorly understood. Here, we show that full-body Cass4 deletion in 5xFAD mice increases amyloid-β (Aβ) deposition, neuronal dystrophy, and cognitive deficits. Since microglia are the predominant brain-resident cells expressing Cass4, we investigated its role in microglial responses to Aβ pathology. Loss of CASS4 impaired microglial mobilization to Aβ plaques and reduced plaque compaction. Phosphoproteomic analysis of purified microglia revealed marked disruption of focal adhesion signaling following Cass4 deletion. Consistent with this, CASS4 deficiency abrogated in vivo microglial recruitment to injury and in vitro wound healing responses, two processes that are centrally orchestrated by focal adhesion biology. Together, these findings identify CASS4 as a critical regulator of microglial function and focal adhesion biology and suggest that CASS4 may represent a therapeutic target for AD.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

CASS4, an Alzheimer’s disease risk gene expressed predominantly by microglia, regulates microglial focal adhesion biology, plaque engagement, and amyloidosis in 5xFAD mice. Loss of CASS4 worsens Aβ burden, neuritic dystrophy, and cognitive flexibility while impairing microglial mobilization and plaque compaction.

Key findings

  • Full-body Cass4 deletion in 5xFAD mice increased ThioS+ Aβ plaque volume and number in hippocampus and cortex, increased large plaques (>1,000 μm³), worsened APP+ and ATG9+ neuritic dystrophy, and impaired cognitive flexibility in the Morris water maze at 4 mo without affecting spatial learning or memory.
  • Microglia-targeted Cass4 deletion (5xFAD Cass4^ΔMG) recapitulated increased hippocampal Aβ load, reduced plaque sphericity/intensity, and increased ATG9+ dystrophic neurites, indicating a microglial role.
  • CASS4-deficient 5xFAD mice showed reduced IBA1+ microglial processes near Aβ plaques and increased 6E10:ThioS ratio, with no differences in microglial numbers, DAM markers, or methoxy-X04 Aβ phagocytosis.
  • Phosphoproteomic analysis of purified CD11b+ microglia found 93 differentially phosphorylated proteins, 17% linked to focal adhesion signaling; CrkII, cortactin, and Abl1 phosphorylation decreased, while integrin β3, Src, filamin A, and LYN increased. Cass4-deficient microglia/macrophages also showed impaired paxillin area, scratch wound healing, and in vivo laser-injury recruitment.

Methods

  • Generated germline Cass4−/− and conditional Cass4^fl/fl Cx3cr1^ERT2Cre mice on C57BL/6J, crossed to 5xFAD; all cohorts were female, with 5xFAD inherited from the male parent. Imaging at 5 mo; behavior at 4 mo.
  • snRNA-seq on pooled flash-frozen hippocampi (n = 6 mice/genotype) yielded 33,985 nuclei and 10 clusters; differential expression used Seurat/MAST, with 2,982 DEGs in excitatory neurons, 213 in inhibitory neurons, and 98 in microglia.
  • Phospho-array on MACS-isolated CD11b+ microglia (n = 5 mice/genotype) used 1,318 site-specific/phospho-specific antibodies; primary microglia, BMDM scratch assays, and two-photon laser injury were used for focal adhesion-related functional assays. Statistics included linear mixed-effects models, Welch’s t tests, and two-way ANOVA.

Limitations

  • The paper states that future studies are needed to determine how individual human AD-associated CASS4 SNPs and gain-of-function mutations affect CASS4 function, neuroinflammation, and degeneration; the present work used knockout mouse models rather than human variants.
  • The paper states that cohorts consisted only of female mice because amyloid pathology is more accelerated and consistent in female 5xFAD mice, so sex-specific effects were not assessed.
  • Evident from the text: findings rely on the 5xFAD amyloidosis model and do not establish CASS4 mechanisms in human AD brain or in tau pathology; phosphoproteomic and snRNA-seq analyses used pooled samples with limited n per genotype.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1084/jem.20260104

Cites

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

60 of 68 cited sources checked · 27 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

  • Findingown data
    § Neuronal health is impaired in 5xFAD Cass4 -/mice · p. 3

    5xFAD Cass4-/- inhibitory neurons exhibited downregulation of genes and pathways involved in neuronal circuitry.

    “Moreover, we observed a downregulation of genes and pathways involved in neuronal circuitry such as Sv2b , Vav3 , Arhgap24 , Asap2 , Elmo1 , and Nrn1 in 5xFAD Cass4 -/-mice relative to 5xFAD littermate controls (Agrawal et al., 2026; Chan et al., 2020; Cowan et al., 2005; Falace et al., 2024; Hale et al., 2011; Kim et al., 2011; Li et al., 2018; Miyamoto et al., 2020; Pugh et al., 2026; Sauzeau et”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Agrawal et al., 2026 source
    • cites Chan et al., 2020 source
    • cites Cowan et al., 2005 source
  • Findingcitation
    § Neuronal health is impaired in 5xFAD Cass4 -/mice · p. 2

    Cass4 is predominantly expressed by microglia in the brain.

    “As previously reported, we found that Cass4 is predominantly expressed by microglia in the brain (Fig. S1 G; Lee et al., 2023; Podlesny-Drabiniok et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2023 source

      The Results passages describe APOE expression and microglial gene-expression patterns, but do not address Cass4. A search of our copy for “Cass4” and for predominant expression in microglia found no passage establishing which brain cell type predominantly expresses Cass4. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Podlesny-Drabiniok et al., 2020 source

      The Cytoskeleton section identifies CASS4 as an Alzheimer’s-associated gene involved in macrophage migration, but does not say where it is predominantly expressed in the brain. Searches for CASS4 expression and microglial enrichment found no passage making that comparison; the section explicitly discusses microglial expression for ABI3 instead. No page number was available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Findingown data
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 8

    17% of the 93 differentially phosphorylated proteins are known to be central molecular players in focal adhesion signaling.

    “17% are known to be central molecular players in focal adhesion sig­ naling (Fig. 6 D and Fig. S5, A and B; Farhadi and Park, 2025; Fujita et al., 2016; Geiger, 2006; Henderson et al., 2019; Huveneers and Danen, 2009; Islam et al., 2025; Ma”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Farhadi and Park, 2025 source
    • cites Fujita et al., 2016 source

      The Abstract reports 17 proteins with abnormal phosphorylation in Alzheimer’s disease models, but does not identify a set of 93 proteins or classify any percentage as central to focal adhesion signaling. The Results section on MARCKS phosphorylation and the targeted searches for focal adhesion, 93 proteins, and 17% likewise provide no passage addressing that classification. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Geiger, 2006 source
  • Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Cass4 appears to be expressed only by microglia among brain-resident cell types.

    “Of the brain-resident cell types, Cass4 appears to be ex­ pressed only by microglia (Lee et al., 2023; Podlesny-Drabiniok et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lee et al., 2023 source

      The Methods section lists cell-type markers, and the Results discuss microglial gene-expression patterns, but neither identifies Cass4 as microglia-specific. Searches for “Cass4” and for its expression across brain-resident cell types found no passage addressing the claim in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Podlesny-Drabiniok et al., 2020 source

      The Cytoskeleton section (page unavailable) discusses CASS4 as an Alzheimer’s-associated locus and its role in macrophage migration, but does not state which brain-resident cells express it. Searches for CASS4 expression and comparisons among brain cell types found no passage establishing that it is expressed only by microglia. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Zhang et al., 2014 source

      The Purity of neuronal, glial, and vascular samples and qRT-PCR validation sections discuss cell-type-specific genes, including microglial markers, but do not identify Cass4. Searches for Cass4 and its full gene name found no passage establishing that its expression is restricted to microglia among brain-resident cell types. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 10

    The CASS4 gene locus has consistently been identified in GWAS studies to be associated with an increased risk of developing AD.

    “The CASS4 gene locus has consistently been identified in GWAS studies to be associated with an increased risk of developing AD (Lambert et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017; Ramos de Matos et al., 2018; Schwartzentruber et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lambert et al., 2013 source
    • cites Lin et al., 2017 source
    • cites Ramos de Matos et al., 2018 source

      The Discussion (page unavailable) says a CASS4 variant had previously been associated with AD in a large meta-analysis, supporting the locus’s connection to AD. But it describes that variant as protective, and this study links it to lower tau biomarker levels; it does not establish that the locus was consistently associated with increased AD risk across GWAS studies. (LLM, conf=0.87)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 40
  • May combine two claims. 21
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 1

    Microglia form stable, protective barriers around Aβ plaques and compact Aβ into tightly packed, less toxic forms.

    “Microglia are deployed to form stable, protective barriers around Aβ plaques in the AD brain, and work to compact Aβ into tightly packed, less toxic forms (Casali et al., 2020; Condello et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Casali et al., 2020 source

      The Discussion says microglia form a physical barrier around plaques and promote compaction; it also links a shift toward diffuse plaques after microglial depletion with increased neuritic dystrophy. The Conclusions describe neuroprotection as a possible mechanism in a 5xFAD mouse model. Our copy does not establish that the barriers are stable or that compacted Aβ is itself less toxic, and the study’s findings do not directly establish this in human AD brains. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Condello et al., 2015 source

      The Discussion describes a protective microglial barrier that is relatively stable over months and increases plaque compaction while limiting potentially neurotoxic Aβ hotspots. But the findings were demonstrated in AD mouse models; the Discussion explicitly says that the barrier’s role in human Alzheimer’s disease remains to be determined, so the unqualified reference to the AD brain is broader than the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Zhao et al., 2017 source

      The Background says microglial processes envelop plaques and may form a barrier that prevents expansion; the Conclusion reports that microglia limit plaque growth in a mouse model. Our copy does not establish that the barriers are stable or that microglia compact Aβ into tightly packed, less toxic forms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 2

    Little is currently known about CASS4 biology or its role in neurological health and disease.

    “Despite CASS4 being increasingly linked to AD risk in humans (EADB et al., 2026; Lambert et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017; Ramos de Matos et al., 2018; Schwartzentruber et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015b), little is currently known about CASS4 biology or its role in neurological health and disease.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Barrett et al., 2013 source
    • cites Deneka et al., 2015 source
    • cites Tikhmyanova et al., 2010 source

      The Introduction, section (1) (page unavailable), says relatively few publications addressed CASS4 function, supporting the claim that its biology was little understood when this 2010 review was written. Section (8) discusses neurological disease in relation to NEDD9, not CASS4. The review does not establish how much was known about CASS4’s neurological roles at the citing paper’s later date. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 1

    Many AD risk genes are primarily expressed in microglia.

    “Most notably, these genetic studies implicate central roles for the innate immune system, with many AD risk genes being primarily expressed in microglia (Efthymiou and Goate, 2017; Karch and Goate, 2015; Lopes et al., 2022).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Efthymiou and Goate, 2017 source

      The Abstract (page unavailable) names several AD-associated genes expressed by microglia, and “AD-risk genes in microglia” describes several genes in AD-risk loci that are expressed there. Neither passage establishes that these genes are primarily expressed in microglia rather than other cell types. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Karch and Goate, 2015 source

      The Immune Response sections identify AD risk genes CD33 and TREM2 as expressed in microglia, and the Emerging Genetics section discusses disrupted microglia-specific networks (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not establish that many AD risk genes are primarily expressed in microglia; it also describes MS4A genes as expressed in myeloid cells and monocytes. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Lopes et al., 2022 source

      The Results section ('Neurological disease loci regulate microglia gene expression'; page not available) links multiple AD-associated genes to microglial regulatory regions and reports that the candidate AD risk gene USP6NL is expressed more highly in microglia than in monocytes. It does not establish that many AD risk genes are primarily expressed in microglia rather than other cell types. (LLM, conf=0.83)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 1

    The degree of plaque compaction positively correlates with neuronal health.

    “These protective functions of microglia have been shown to limit axonal dystrophy to neurons in the immediate area, with the degree of plaque compaction positively correlating with neuronal health (Casali et al., 2020; Condello et al., 2015; Zhao et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Casali et al., 2020 source
    • cites Condello et al., 2015 source
    • cites Zhao et al., 2017 source

      The Results and Discussion passages report that microglia restrict plaque enlargement and that dendrites passing through plaques show abnormalities, including beyond the immediate plaque area. A search for plaque compaction found no passage measuring its degree or correlating it with neuronal health, so the attributed correlation cannot be verified from this paper. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 2

    CASS4 is a member of the Cas protein family.

    “These studies have helped to identify CASS4 as a member of the Cas protein family (Singh et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Singh et al., 2008 source

      The Results section identifies HEPL as a new Cas family member, but the passages from our copy do not identify HEPL as CASS4. A search for “CASS4” found no passage establishing that link, so this copy alone cannot verify the claim about CASS4. (LLM, conf=0.72)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Introduction · p. 2

    Cas proteins are critically involved in the regulation of focal adhesions.

    “Cas proteins are best known for their critical involvement in the regulation of focal adhesions (Deneka et al., 2015; Singh et al., 2008)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Deneka et al., 2015 source
    • cites Singh et al., 2008 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Dynamic FAK signaling is commonly seen surrounding Aβ plaques in human AD patients.

    “For instance, dynamic FAK signaling is commonly seen sur­ rounding Aβ plaques in human AD patients (Grace and Busciglio, 2003; Saleh et al., 2022)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Grace and Busciglio, 2003 source
    • cites Saleh et al., 2022 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 10

    Focal adhesions are positioned at critical junctions of cells, linking the extracellular matrix with the actin cytoskeleton and allowing microglia to efficiently survey the parenchyma and respond to injuries.

    “Focal adhesions are positioned at critical junctions of cellslinking the extracellular matrix with the actin cytoskeletonand allowing microglia to efficiently survey the parenchyma and respond to injuries (Choi et al., 2015; Meller et al., 2017).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Choi et al., 2015 source

      The Results section on microglial motility says microglia survey the brain environment and extend processes toward injured sites; the paper also links FAK activity to microglial motility and injury response. Its discussion of extracellular-matrix–integrin interaction does not state that focal adhesions link the matrix to the actin cytoskeleton, or establish that this physical linkage enables surveillance and injury response. No page numbers are available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Meller et al., 2017 source

      The section on Kindlin3–integrin interaction says adhesion complexes bridge the cytoskeleton and extracellular matrix in migrating cells. The Introduction describes microglial surveillance, and the injury-response results link Kindlin3-related adhesion signaling to movement toward injury. Our copy does not establish that focal adhesions enable efficient surveillance of the parenchyma, so the claimed causal link goes beyond the evidence. (LLM, conf=0.84)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Multiple canonical focal adhesion signaling molecules are actively engaged in the AD brain.

    “Interestingly, previous work has uncovered that multiple canonical focal ad­ hesion signaling molecules are actively engaged in the AD brain.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grace and Busciglio, 2003 source
    • cites Saleh et al., 2022 source
    • cites Caltagarone et al., 2007 source

      Section 3.1 reports MAPK activation in AD brain, and section 2.3 places paxillin in dystrophic neurites in human AD brain. But the paper's evidence that focal-adhesion molecules FAK and paxillin are phosphorylated comes from Aβ-treated cells and neurons in culture, not AD brain tissue. The claim extends that activation finding to multiple focal-adhesion molecules in the AD brain. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 10

    M-CSF signaling is crucial to brain macrophage function.

    “M-CSF signaling is crucial to brain macro­ phage function, and phosphorylation of Y561 is known to relieve autoinhibition of the M-CSF receptor (Stanley and Chitu, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stanley and Chitu, 2014 source

      The CSF-1R Kinase Structure and Activation section states that phosphorylation of Tyr-561 relieves receptor autoinhibition. The Abstract says CSF-1R regulates brain microglial development, but the paper identifies both CSF-1 and IL-34 as receptor ligands; these passages do not establish that M-CSF specifically is crucial to brain macrophage function. (LLM, conf=0.82)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Mutations in the focal adhesion gene PTK2B have been linked to increased AD risk in GWAS studies.

    “Moreover, mutations in the focal adhesion gene PTK2B , which encodes the protein PYK2 and is a suggested CASS4binding partner (Barrett et al., 2013; Beck et al., 2014), have also been linked to increased AD risk in GWAS studies (Lambert et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017; Ramos de Matos et al., 2018; Schwartzentruber et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Lambert et al., 2013 source
    • cites Lin et al., 2017 source
    • cites Ramos de Matos et al., 2018 source

      The Introduction and Discussion passages discuss GWAS findings for other genes, including CD2AP and CASS4, but do not address PTK2B. Searches for “PTK2B” and “PTK2B PYK2 genetic variants increased Alzheimer’s disease risk GWAS” found no passage linking PTK2B variants to increased AD risk. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.74)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Soluble CSF1 receptor enhances microglial clustering around Aβ plaques and attenuates neuronal dystrophy in 5xFAD mice.

    “For instance, soluble CSF1 receptor has re­ cently been shown to enhance microglial clustering around Aβ plaques and attenuate neuronal dystrophy in 5xFAD mice (Zhang et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Integrins bind Aβ and activate focal adhesion signaling.

    “and integrins have been shown to bind Aβ and activate focal adhesion signaling (Caltagarone et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Caltagarone et al., 2007 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 8

    Focal adhesion signaling has recently been linked to AD through both genetic risk factors and Aβ-associated signaling events.

    “Interestingly, focal adhesion signaling has re­ cently been linked to AD through both genetic risk factors and Aβ-associated signaling events (Grace and Busciglio, 2003; Lambert et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017; Manocha et al., 2015; Ramos de Matos et al., 2018; Saleh et al., 2022; Schwartzentruber et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015b)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Grace and Busciglio, 2003 source
    • cites Lambert et al., 2013 source
    • cites Lin et al., 2017 source

      The Discussion (page not provided) links CASS4 to focal adhesion integrity and kinase activation, and reports its association with AD risk. It does not establish Aβ-associated focal adhesion signaling events; its discussion of amyloid precursor protein is speculative and does not make that connection. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • Rests on an assumption: The contribution of focal adhesion signaling to microglial biology and AD is currently poorly understood.
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    CD2AP interacts with the CSF1 receptor to regulate microgliosis in 5xFAD mice.

    “work focused on another AD risk gene involved in focal adhesion signaling, CD2AP , demon­ strated that CD2AP interacts with the CSF1 receptor to regulate microgliosis in 5xFAD mice (Zhang et al., 2024).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Zhang et al., 2024 source

      The Results (‘CD2AP modulates CSF1R function’; page not provided) verify an interaction between CD2AP and CSF1R and report reduced microgliosis in 5xFAD mice with microglial CD2AP haploinsufficiency. But the Results call CSF1R’s role in that reduction ‘indirect evidence,’ and the Discussion says the authors could not perform the rescue experiment needed to establish that CSF1R mediates the effect. The claim overstates the demonstrated mechanism. (LLM, conf=0.86)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 10

    Osteopontin is known to leverage focal adhesion signaling to influence cellular responses and wound healing.

    “another molecule known to leverage focal adhesion signaling to influence cellular responses and wound healing (Azizan et al., 2025; Dashdulam et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Azizan et al., 2025 source

      The Introduction (page unavailable) describes osteopontin's roles in cell adhesion and signaling, and the Discussion (page unavailable) describes cellular responses to its binding to integrin receptors. Our copy does not identify focal adhesion signaling as the mechanism or connect these effects to wound healing. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
    • cites Dashdulam et al., 2020 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Osteopontin has a bidirectional role in neurodegeneration, inducing harmful proinflammatory cascades in some contexts while mediating neuroprotective Aβ clearance in others.

    “osteopontin has been suggested to have a bidirectional role in neurodegeneration, such as inducing harmful proinflammatory cascades in some contexts while mediating neuroprotective Aβ clearance in others (Azizan et al., 2025).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Azizan et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 8

    Contractile actin filament assembly, stress fiber assembly, and regulation of actin filament-based processes are molecular processes centrally involved in focal adhesion biology.

    “all of which are molecular processes centrally involved in focal adhesion biology (Burridge and Guilluy, 2016; Ciobanasu et al., 2012; Geiger et al., 2009; Wozniak et al., 2004).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Burridge and Guilluy, 2016 source
    • cites Ciobanasu et al., 2012 source
    • cites Geiger et al., 2009 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    PTK2B encodes the protein PYK2 and is a suggested CASS4-binding partner.

    “Moreover, mutations in the focal adhesion gene PTK2B , which encodes the protein PYK2 and is a suggested CASS4binding partner (Barrett et al., 2013; Beck et al., 2014), have also been linked to increased AD risk in GWAS studies (Lambert et al., 2013; Lin et al., 2017; Ramos de Matos et al., 2018; Schwartzentruber et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2015b).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Barrett et al., 2013 source
    • cites Beck et al., 2014 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 10

    Phosphorylation of Y561 relieves autoinhibition of the M-CSF receptor.

    “M-CSF signaling is crucial to brain macro­ phage function, and phosphorylation of Y561 is known to relieve autoinhibition of the M-CSF receptor (Stanley and Chitu, 2014).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Stanley and Chitu, 2014 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 10

    Microglia migrate to Aβ pathology and form stable, protective barriers around them.

    “Microglia are known to mi­ grate to Aβ pathology and form stable, protective barriers around them (Condello et al., 2015).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Condello et al., 2015 source
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Materials and methods Mice · p. 12

    The parental origin of the 5xFAD transgene impacts Aβ burden in offspring.

    “Recent evidence showed that the parental origin of the 5xFAD transgene impacts Aβ burden in offspring (Sasmita et al., 2025)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Sasmita et al., 2025 source
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § snRNA-seq · p. 14

    The Combined Score integrates statistical significance (Fisher exact test P value) and enrichment magnitude (z-score) to prioritize biologically relevant pathways.

    “The Combined Score was reported, which integrates statistical significance (Fisher exact test P value) and en­ richment magnitude (z-score) to prioritize biologically rele­ vant pathways (Chen et al., 2013).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chen et al., 2013 source

      The Implementation section defines the Combined Score as log(Fisher exact test P value) multiplied by a z-score and says it is used to rank enriched terms. However, it defines that z-score as the deviation from a term’s expected rank, not as a measure of enrichment magnitude. The Results and discussion section describes ranking gene-set terms, rather than specifically validating biological relevance of pathways. (LLM, conf=0.85)

      Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § Microglial engagement with Aβ plaques is reduced in the absence of CASS4 · p. 6

    There was slightly elevated staining of the homeostatic marker P2RY12 in Cass4-/- mice relative to WT controls.

    “However, we did detect slightly elevated staining of the homeostatic marker P2RY12 in Cass4 -/-mice relative to WT controls (Fig. S4 D).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Microglial engagement with Aβ plaques is reduced in the absence of CASS4 · p. 6

    Loss of Cass4 did not affect the number of microglia, microgliosis, or expression of the DAM marker AXL by IBA1+ cells in the absence of amyloid pathology.

    “Similarly, loss of Cass4 was not found to affect the number of microglia, microgliosis, or the expression of the DAM marker AXL by IBA1 + cells (Fig. S4, A-C) in the absence of amyloid pathology.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data
    § Cass4 deletion in 5xFAD mice leads to defects in cognitive flexibility · p. 4

    During the location 2 probe trial, 5xFAD Cass4-/- mice spent significantly less time in the new location 2 target quadrant and significantly more time in the opposite quadrant (location 1 target).

    “We also revealed a similar cognitive flexibility impairment during the location 2 probe trial phase of the test, where 5xFAD Cass4 -/mice spent significantly less time in the new location 2 target quadrant and significantly more time in the opposite quadrant, which was the location 1 target quadrant (Fig. 3, H-J).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data
    § snRNA-seq · p. 14

    Nuclei populations were visualized in 10 distinct clusters, including inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons, microglia, astrocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursors.

    “nuclei populations were visualized in 10 distinct clusters, including inhibitory neurons, excitatory neurons, microglia, astrocytes, endothelial cells, pericytes, oligodendrocytes, and oligodendrocyte precursors.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Alzheimer's genetic risk factor CASS4 controls microglial focal adhesion biology and amyloidosis · p. 1

    CASS4 is a critical regulator of microglial function and focal adhesion biology.

    “Together, these findings identify CASS4 as a critical regulator of microglial function and focal adhesion biology and suggest that CASS4 may represent a therapeutic target for AD.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion · p. 10

    Loss of Cass4 led to worsened Aβ plaque pathology and altered microglial responses.

    “In our studies, we revealed that loss of Cass4 led to worsened Aβ plaque pathology and altered microglial responses.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Microglial engagement with Aβ plaques is reduced in the absence of CASS4 · p. 6

    Aβ plaque compaction is impaired with the loss of CASS4 and is associated with defects in the ability of microglia to form close contacts with Aβ aggregates.

    “Together, these findings indicate that Aβ plaque compaction is impaired with the loss of CASS4 and further show that this is associated with defects in the ability of microglia to form close contacts with Aβ aggregates.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    M-CSF and osteopontin have been linked to AD and focal adhesion signaling.

    “M-CSF and osteopontin have also been linked to AD and focal adhesion signaling.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § CASS4 modulates focal adhesion-associated processes and signaling in microglia · p. 10

    Focal adhesions play critical roles in both M-CSF- and osteopontin-mediated migration and wound resolution in scratch assays.

    “Focal adhesions are also known to play critical roles in both M-CSFand osteopontin-mediated migration and wound resolution in scratch assays (Dashdulam et al., 2020; Murrey et al., 2020).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Dashdulam et al., 2020 source
    • cites Murrey et al., 2020 source
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Neuronal health is impaired in 5xFAD Cass4 -/mice · p. 3

    Cass4 deletion leads to exacerbated neuritic dystrophy and increased expression of genes associated with memory and learning in the hippocampus of 5xFAD Cass4-/- mice.

    “Taken together, these findings suggest that Cass4 deletion leads to exacerbated neuritic dystrophy and increased expression of genes associated with memory and learning in the hippocampus of 5xFAD Cass4 -/- mice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Microglial engagement with Aβ plaques is reduced in the absence of CASS4 · p. 6

    Genetic ablation of Cass4 does not impact microglial numbers, DAM phenotype, or phagocytic activity in response to Aβ pathology.

    “In total, these findings suggest that genetic ablation of Cass4 does not impact microglial numbers, DAM phenotype, or phagocytic activity in response to Aβ pathology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation
    § Discussion · p. 11

    CASS4 is a prominent genetic risk factor for late-onset AD.

    “Despite numerous GWAS studies indicating that CASS4 is a prominent genetic risk factor for late-onset AD”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: The role of CASS4 in the brain remains relatively unexplored.
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion · p. 11

    Loss of CASS4 impacts focal adhesion protein phosphorylation levels and disrupts M-CSF- and osteopontin-associated wound healing responses in scratch assays.

    “Our studies show that loss of CASS4 impacts focal adhesion protein phosphorylation levels and disrupts M-CSF- and osteopontin-associated wound healing responses in scratch assays.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § MWM · p. 12

    Behavior experiments were performed in a blinded fashion.

    “All behavior experiments were performed between 8 a.m. and 12 p.m. in a blinded fashion.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § snRNA-seq · p. 14

    Cluster identification was determined using a comprehensive list of known marker genes for brain cell types.

    “identification of each cluster was determined using a comprehensive list of known marker genes for brain cell types.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data
    § Supplemental material · p. 26

    Data are representative of six independent mice analyzed.

    “Data are representative of six independent mice analyzed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Supplemental material · p. 24

    For all imaging experiments, three brain sections per mouse were imaged, with at least three FOV taken per section per region (a total of 9-12 images per mouse).

    “For all imaging experiments, three brain sections per mouse were imaged, with at least three FOV taken per section per region (a total of 9-12 images per mouse).”
    • Also stated in: § Supplemental material · p. 25 · plain
      “For all imaging experiments, three brain sections per mouse were imaged at 40× magnification, with at least three FOV taken per section per region (a total of 9-12 images per mouse).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Primary cell culture · p. 14

    Purity of primary microglia cultures was authenticated by immunocytochemistry using anti-IBA1, anti-GFAP, and anti-OLIG2.

    “Purity of primary microglia cultures was authenticated by im­ munocytochemistry using anti-IBA1 (234-308; Synaptic Sys­ tems, 1:1,000), anti-GFAP (2.2B10; Thermo Fisher Scientific, 1: 1,000), and anti-OLIG2 (AB9610; Millipore Sigma, 1:1,000).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Materials and methods Mice · p. 11

    All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guidelines and regulations of the University of Virginia and approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee.

    “All experiments were conducted in accordance with the guide­ lines and regulations of the University of Virginia and approved by the University of Virginia Animal Care and Use Committee.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Supplemental material · p. 26

    Data are representative of five independent mice analyzed.

    “Data are representative of five independent mice analyzed.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data
    § Discussion · p. 11

    CASS4 is a pivotal regulator of focal adhesion signaling and related processes such as wound healing and microglial mobilization to injury and neuropathology.

    “Our work has also identified CASS4 as a pivotal regulator of focal adhesion signaling and related processes such as wound healing and microglial mobilization to injury and neuropathology.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Supplemental material · p. 26

    The phosphoprotein data were averaged across two independent experiments.

    “Data averaged across two independent experiments.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Immunocytochemistry · p. 14

    Three independent experiments were performed, with a total of 70-80 images taken per group.

    “Three independent experiments were performed, with a total of 70-80 images taken per group.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data
    § MACS isolation of macrophages and phospho-array · p. 13

    Two separate assays were performed on a total of five mice per genotype, and the results were averaged across both assays.

    “Two separate as­ says were performed on a total of five mice per genotype, and the results were averaged across both assays.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § snRNA-seq · p. 14

    Genes canonically restricted to neurons were excluded from glial cell clusters.

    “genes canonically restricted to neurons (such as Kcnip4 and Cadm1 ) were excluded from glial cell clusters.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given
    § snRNA-seq · p. 14

    To minimize RNA artifacts, mitochondrial genes, ribosome genes, unannotated genes, and pseudogenes were excluded from all clusters.

    “To minimize RNA artifacts, mitochondrial genes (mt ), ribosome genes (rpl , -rps ), unannotated genes (gm , -rik$ , -ac , and loc ), and pseu­ dogenes (ps$ ) were excluded from all clusters”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given
    § Statistical analysis · p. 16

    Outliers were identified and excluded using the Robust regression and OUTlier removal method in GraphPad Prism 11, with the false discovery rate set to 1%.

    “Outliers were identified and excluded using the Robust regression and OUTlier removal method in GraphPad Prism 11, with the false discovery rate set to 1%.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
50 of 50
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CASS4's role in microglial function and focal adhesion biology is conserved between mice and humans.

    “Together, these findings identify CASS4 as a critical regulator of microglial function and focal adhesion biology and suggest that CASS4 may represent a therapeutic target for AD.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Focal adhesion biology is regulated predominantly at the posttranslational level.

    “Given that focal adhesion biology is known to be regulated predominantly at the posttranslational level”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The contribution of focal adhesion signaling to microglial biology and AD is currently poorly understood.

    “yet the contribution of this pathway to microglial biology and AD is currently poorly understood.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Little is currently known about how individual disease-associated mutations impact CASS4 function.

    “little is currently known about how individual diseaseassociated mutations impact CASS4 function.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The role of CASS4 in the brain remains relatively unexplored.

    “the role of CASS4 in the brain remains relatively unexplored.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Proteins marked with green asterisks are known to interact with the focal adhesion protein p130cas, and proteins marked with pink asterisks function in focal adhesion and actin pathways.

    “Green asterisks denote proteins that are known to interact with the focal adhesion protein p130cas and pink asterisks denote proteins that function in focal adhesion and actin pathways.”
6 of 6

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Pathway-analysis software differs between figure caption and methods

    Minor

    The Figure 6 caption attributes its functional enrichment analysis to g:Profiler, whereas the snRNA-seq methods say pathway analysis was performed with Enrichr. The Figure 2 caption also names g:Profiler.

  • Laser-imaging sample count differs for the Cass4-deleted group

    Minor

    The Figure 6 caption reports four to five mice per group for two-photon imaging, but the accompanying Cass4-deleted microglia video says six independent mice were analyzed.

2 of 2

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

Authors
Walsh, A. E., Davis, B. A., Samuels, J. D., Mills, W. A., Thanos, J. M., Johnson, A. M., Moore, K. A., Puchalski, M. A., Steacy, E. J., Wendell, B. W., Daugherty-Lopès, A., Shimpi, A. A., Eyo, U. B., & Lukens, J. R.
Affiliations
  • University of Virginia 1 Center for Brain Immunology and Glia (BIG), Harrison Family Translational Research Center in Alzheimer’s and Neurodegenerative Diseases, Department of Neuroscience, , Charlottesville, VA,
  • University of Virginia 4 Department of Biomedical Engineering, , Charlottesville, VA,
Venue
Journal of Experimental Medicine
Published
2026-10-27
Volume
223
Issue
12
ISSN
  • 0022-1007
  • 1540-9538
Language
en
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (R01AG071996, R01AG087406, RF1AG078684, R01AG086344, F31AG091926, F31AG089911)
  • National Institute on Aging
  • Cure Alzheimer’s Fund
  • Owens Family Foundation
  • Harrison Family Foundation
  • Rick Sharp Foundation
  • Biotechnology Training Program Grant (T32GM136615)
  • VIVA consortium
  • University of Virginia (T32NS115657, 5T32AI7496-28)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-27.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-27.

Cited sources are checked by gpt-6-sol.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review