Cited by 28Sport and Mega-Event ImpactsDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchConferences and Exhibitions Management

How authenticity in events fosters social sustainability: Towards an authenticity ecosystem and implications for destination management

Open access
Le, Truc H., Abreu Novais, Margarida, Arcodia, Charles, Berchtenbreiter, Ralph, Humpe, Andreas, Nguyen, Nicole·2024·Tourism Management Perspectives

Abstract

This study systematically and critically synthesises how the notion of authenticity has been addressed in the extant events literature to foster social sustainability in host destinations. Studies between 1996 and 2020 were systematically collected and analysed, revealing an observable emphasis on how authentic events can drive and improve social sustainability in destinations. By adopting a systems thinking approach, this study subsequently developed a holistic multi-actor network, so-called authenticity ecosystem. In this authenticity ecosystem, authenticity in events is posited as a vehicle permeating host destinations to drive social sustainability. Following this, four significant research directions were proposed to advance the authenticity scholarship in events and destination management, thus providing strategic agendas for the future of event and destination management research. This study therefore contributes to the understanding of how destination managers can better use authenticity in events to enhance social sustainability in host destinations.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101222

Cites

117 of 117 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 121 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Le, T. H., Abreu Novais, M., Arcodia, C., Berchtenbreiter, R., Humpe, A., & Nguyen, N.
Affiliations
  • Griffith University (AU)
  • Munich University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Le, Truc H.
Venue
Tourism Management Perspectives
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-03
Volume
51
Pages
101222
ISSN
2211-9736 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4391095510
Cited by
28
References
121
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7
FWCI
20.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Tourism Management Perspectives (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sport and Mega-Event Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Conferences and Exhibitions Management
Keywords
authenticity, events, social sustainability, destination management, multi-actor networks, systems thinking, event management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review