Cited by 23Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchToxin Mechanisms and ImmunotoxinsBotulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Clostridium difficile and Clostridium sordellii toxins, proinflammatory versus anti-inflammatory response.

Popoff, Michel R.·2018·Toxicon

Abstract

Clostridium difficile and Clostridium sordellii produce related potent toxins (C. difficile toxin A (TcdA) and toxin B (TcdB), C. sordellii lethal toxin (TcsL) and hemorrhagic toxin (TcsH)) which belong to the large clostridial glucosylating toxin (LCGT) family. TcsL is the main C. sordellii toxin as most of toxigenic C. sordellii strains only synthesize this toxin. Intestinal colonization by C. difficile subsequently to unbalanced microbiota is accompanied by release of toxins which induce local tissue destruction and severe inflammatory response. TcdA and TcdB inactivate Rho-GTPases. Notably inactivation of RhoA results in the stimulation of the pyrin/ASC inflammasome, which is one of the main signaling pathways used by these toxins to trigger the inflammatory response. In contrast, TcsL induces an anti-inflammatory effect, mainly by inactivating Ras proteins which results in blockage of the cell cycle and killing of immune cells. The absence or moderate local inflammatory response allows C. sordellii spreading in deep tissues, production of toxin which is released in the general circulation and causes a toxic shock syndrome. The toxin mechanisms of pro-versus anti-inflammatory responses are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.toxicon.2017.11.003

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In domestic or captive animal environments and in humans, the initiation of dysbiosis leading to domination by anaerobic clostridia, particularly by Clostridioides difficile, has been linked to antibiotic treatments, hospitalization, and neonatal microbiomes.

    “In domestic or captive animal environments and in humans, the initiation of dysbiosis leading to domination by anaerobic clostridia, particularly by Clostridioides difficile, has been linked to antibiotic treatments, hospitalization, and neonatal microbiomes (Antharam et al., 2013;Cassir et al., 2015;Popoff, 2018).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Popoff, M. R.
Affiliations
Institut Pasteur (FR)
Corresponding author
Popoff, Michel R.
Venue
Toxicon
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
149
Pages
54-64
ISSN
0041-0101 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769670676
Cited by
23
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Toxicon (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Toxin Mechanisms and Immunotoxins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders
Keywords
Clostridium difficile, Clostridium sordellii, toxin A, toxin B, lethal toxin, hemorrhagic toxin, RhoA, anti-inflammatory response, pro-inflammatory response, toxic shock syndrome, intestinal colonization, dysbiosis
MeSH terms
Bacterial Proteins, Bacterial Toxins, Enterotoxins, Humans, Cytokines, Clostridioides difficile, Models, Immunological, rhoA GTP-Binding Protein, Clostridium sordellii, Paraclostridium sordellii, Inflammasomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review