Cited by 2,641Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens researchInfection Control in HealthcareAntimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus

Burden of Clostridium difficile Infection in the United States

Open access
Lessa, Fernanda C., Mu, Yi, Bamberg, Wendy M., Beldavs, Zintars G., Dumyati, Ghinwa K., Dunn, John R., Farley, Monica M., Holzbauer, Stacy M. +9 more·2015·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The magnitude and scope of Clostridium difficile infection in the United States continue to evolve. METHODS: In 2011, we performed active population- and laboratory-based surveillance across 10 geographic areas in the United States to identify cases of C. difficile infection (stool specimens positive for C. difficile on either toxin or molecular assay in residents ≥ 1 year of age). Cases were classified as community-associated or health care-associated. In a sample of cases of C. difficile infection, specimens were cultured and isolates underwent molecular typing. We used regression models to calculate estimates of national incidence and total number of infections, first recurrences, and deaths within 30 days after the diagnosis of C. difficile infection. RESULTS: A total of 15,461 cases of C. difficile infection were identified in the 10 geographic areas; 65.8% were health care-associated, but only 24.2% had onset during hospitalization. After adjustment for predictors of disease incidence, the estimated number of incident C. difficile infections in the United States was 453,000 (95% confidence interval [CI], 397,100 to 508,500). The incidence was estimated to be higher among females (rate ratio, 1.26; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.27), whites (rate ratio, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.56 to 2.0), and persons 65 years of age or older (rate ratio, 8.65; 95% CI, 8.16 to 9.31). The estimated number of first recurrences of C. difficile infection was 83,000 (95% CI, 57,000 to 108,900), and the estimated number of deaths was 29,300 (95% CI, 16,500 to 42,100). The North American pulsed-field gel electrophoresis type 1 (NAP1) strain was more prevalent among health care-associated infections than among community-associated infections (30.7% vs. 18.8%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: C. difficile was responsible for almost half a million infections and was associated with approximately 29,000 deaths in 2011. (Funded by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1408913

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because the populations under surveillance in the 9 EIP sites are diverse, EIP findings can and have been used to extrapolate to national estimates of other infections.

    “Furthermore, because the populations under surveillance in the 9 sites are diverse (by age distribution, race, urban/rural, and other factors), EIP findings can and have been used to extrapolate to national estimates of other infections [33,34].”

    From Burden of Candidemia in the United States, 2017 (2020) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Methods (Surveillance Population and Definition; Statistical Analysis) describe geographically varied EIP surveillance areas and use EIP data to estimate the national burden of C. difficile infection, accounting for demographic factors. This supports the cited paper as an example of national extrapolation. It studied 10 EIP sites, however, not the nine sites named in the citing sentence, and does not establish that site diversity was the reason extrapolation was possible. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. 2005, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 54, 1201
  2. Heitjan DF, 1991, J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat, 40, 13
  3. 2014, Fed Regist, 79, 10524
  4. 2011, Fed Regist, 76, 51476

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lessa, F. C., Mu, Y., Bamberg, W. M., Beldavs, Z. G., Dumyati, G. K., Dunn, J. R., Farley, M. M., Holzbauer, S. M., Meek, J. I., Phipps, E. C., Wilson, L. E., Winston, L. G., Cohen, J. A., Limbago, B. M., Fridkin, S. K., Gerding, D. N., & McDonald, L. C.
Affiliations
  • National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (US)
  • Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (US)
  • Oregon Health Authority (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
  • Tennessee Department of Health (US)
  • Emory University (US)
  • Office of Readiness and Response (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Maryland Department of Health (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Loyola University Chicago (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2015-02-26
Volume
372
Issue
9
Pages
825-834
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2071054182
Cited by
2,641
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 94 · 2025: 111 · 2024: 120 · 2023: 150 · 2022: 176 · 2021: 225 · 2020: 328 · 2019: 382 · 2018: 356 · 2017: 323 · 2016: 262 · 2015: 108 · 2014: 1
FWCI
270.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
other-oa
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Digital Repository at the University of Maryland (University of Maryland College Park) (public-domain)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (CC999999)
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infection Control in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antimicrobial Resistance in Staphylococcus
Keywords
Clostridium difficile infection, incidence, nosocomial infections, community-associated infections, recurrence, mortality, NAP1 strain, molecular typing, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Child, Child, Preschool, Clostridium Infections, Cross Infection, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Middle Aged, Population Surveillance, Recurrence, United States, Bacterial Typing Techniques, Incidence, Clostridioides difficile, Electrophoresis, Gel, Pulsed-Field, Age Distribution, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review