Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 180

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Adductomics: Characterizing exposures to reactive electrophiles

Open access
Rappaport, Stephen M., Li, He, Grigoryan, Hasmik, Funk, William E., Williams, Evan R.·2012·Toxicology Letters

Abstract

To understand environmental causes of disease, unbiased methods are needed to characterize the human exposome, which represents all toxicants to which people are exposed from both exogenous and endogenous sources. Because they directly modify DNA and important proteins, reactive electrophiles are probably the most important constituents of the exposome. Exposures to reactive electrophiles can be characterized by measuring adducts from reactions between circulating electrophiles and blood nucleophiles. We define an ‘adductome’ as the totality of such adducts with a given nucleophilic target. Because of their greater abundance and residence times in human blood, adducts of hemoglobin (Hb) and human serum albumin (HSA) are preferable to those of DNA and glutathione for characterizing adductomes. In fact, the nucleophilic hotspot represented by the only free sulfhydryl group in HSA (HSA-Cys34) offers particular advantages for adductomic experiments. Although targeted adducts of HSA-Cys34 have been monitored for decades, an unbiased method has only recently been reported for visualizing the HSA-Cys34 ‘subadductome’. The method relies upon a novel mass spectrometry application, termed fixed-step selected reaction monitoring (FS-SRM), to profile Cys34 adducts in tryptic digests of HSA. Here, we selectively review the literature regarding the potential of adductomics to partially elucidate the human exposome, with particular attention to the HSA-Cys34 subadductome.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.002

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 180

Metadata

Authors
Rappaport, S. M., Li, H., Grigoryan, H., Funk, W. E., & Williams, E. R.
Venue
Toxicology Letters
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-08
Volume
213
Issue
1
Pages
83-90
ISSN
0378-4274 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2060365113
Cited by
180
References
4
FWCI
8.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Adductomics: Characterizing exposures to reactive electrophiles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.002
The paper
Rappaport, S. M., Li, H., Grigoryan, H., Funk, W. E., & Williams, E. R. (2012). Adductomics: Characterizing exposures to reactive electrophiles. Toxicology Letters. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.04.002

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.