Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: A unified theory
Open accessAbstract
Robustness of coexistence against changes of parameters is investigated in a model-independent manner by analyzing the feedback loop of population regulation. We define coexistence as a fixed point of the community dynamics with no population having zero size. It is demonstrated that the parameter range allowing coexistence shrinks and disappears when the Jacobian of the dynamics decreases to zero. A general notion of regulating factors/variables is introduced. For each population, its impact and sensitivity niches are defined as the differential impact on, and the differential sensitivity towards, the regulating variables, respectively. Either the similarity of the impact niches or the similarity of the sensitivity niches results in a small Jacobian and in a reduced likelihood of coexistence. For the case of a resource continuum, this result reduces to the usual "limited niche overlap" picture for both kinds of niche. As an extension of these ideas to the coexistence of infinitely many species, we demonstrate that Roughgarden's example for coexistence of a continuum of populations is structurally unstable.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Gause's CCCC principle: the number of coexisting species cannot exceed the number of regulating factors in equilibrium.
“Gause’s CCCC principle (“Complete Competitors Cannot Coexist”) can be rephrased using the concepts of modern ecology: the number of coexisting species cannot exceed the number of regulating factors in equilibrium.”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
The ecological principle of competitive exclusion permits the survival of just a single replicator species on a single limiting resource.
“The ecological principle of competitive exclusion (the Gause-principle, see Section 2.1) permits the survival of just a single replicator species on a single limiting resource [15]”
From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [15]
Cites
Mechanisms of Maintenance of Species Diversity
Chesson, P. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.343 · Cited by 6,645 · see citing works
The Ecology of Adaptive Radiation
Schluter, D. (2000) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198505235.001.0001 · Cited by 4,974 · see citing works
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390 · see citing works
Armstrong, R. A., & McGehee, R. (1980) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283553 · Cited by 1,016 · see citing works
Coexistence of two types on a single resource in discrete time
Adler, F. R. (1990) · Journal of Mathematical Biology · doi:10.1007/bf00160232 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems
Szilágyi, A., Zachar, I., Scheuring, I., Kun, Á., Könnyű, B., & Czárán, T. (2017) · Life · doi:10.3390/life7040048 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Könnyű, B., & Czárán, T. (2013) · BMC Evolutionary Biology · doi:10.1186/1471-2148-13-204 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
- Authors
- Meszéna, G., Gyllenberg, M., Pásztor, L., & Metz, J. A. J.
- Affiliations
- Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
- University of Helsinki (FI)
- Leiden University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Meszéna, Géza
- Venue
- Theoretical Population Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2006-02
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 68-87
- ISSN
- 0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2062626613
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 9.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pure.iiasa.ac.at
- Locations
- Theoretical Population Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
- Keywords
- competitive exclusion, limiting similarity, species coexistence, community dynamics, population regulation, Jacobian matrix, niche overlap, structural instability
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Behavior, Animal, Competitive Behavior, Models, Biological, Population Dynamics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review