Cited by 298Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesEcosystem dynamics and resilience

Competitive exclusion and limiting similarity: A unified theory

Open access
Meszéna, Géza, Gyllenberg, Mats, Pásztor, Liz, Metz, Johan A.J.·2006·Theoretical Population Biology

Abstract

Robustness of coexistence against changes of parameters is investigated in a model-independent manner by analyzing the feedback loop of population regulation. We define coexistence as a fixed point of the community dynamics with no population having zero size. It is demonstrated that the parameter range allowing coexistence shrinks and disappears when the Jacobian of the dynamics decreases to zero. A general notion of regulating factors/variables is introduced. For each population, its impact and sensitivity niches are defined as the differential impact on, and the differential sensitivity towards, the regulating variables, respectively. Either the similarity of the impact niches or the similarity of the sensitivity niches results in a small Jacobian and in a reduced likelihood of coexistence. For the case of a resource continuum, this result reduces to the usual "limited niche overlap" picture for both kinds of niche. As an extension of these ideas to the coexistence of infinitely many species, we demonstrate that Roughgarden's example for coexistence of a continuum of populations is structurally unstable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.07.001

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gause's CCCC principle: the number of coexisting species cannot exceed the number of regulating factors in equilibrium.

    “Gause’s CCCC principle (“Complete Competitors Cannot Coexist”) can be rephrased using the concepts of modern ecology: the number of coexisting species cannot exceed the number of regulating factors in equilibrium.”
  • The ecological principle of competitive exclusion permits the survival of just a single replicator species on a single limiting resource.

    “The ecological principle of competitive exclusion (the Gause-principle, see Section 2.1) permits the survival of just a single replicator species on a single limiting resource [15]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Meszéna, G., Gyllenberg, M., Pásztor, L., & Metz, J. A. J.
Affiliations
  • Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
  • University of Helsinki (FI)
  • Leiden University (NL)
Corresponding author
Meszéna, Géza
Venue
Theoretical Population Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-02
Volume
69
Issue
1
Pages
68-87
ISSN
0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062626613
Cited by
298
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 16 · 2012: 11
FWCI
9.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Theoretical Population Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IIASA PURE (International Institute of Applied Systems Analysis) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
Keywords
competitive exclusion, limiting similarity, species coexistence, community dynamics, population regulation, Jacobian matrix, niche overlap, structural instability
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Competitive Behavior, Models, Biological, Population Dynamics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review