Cited by 25Origins and Evolution of LifeRNA and protein synthesis mechanismsEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Spatial aspects of prebiotic replicator coexistence and community stability in a surface-bound RNA world model

Open access
Könnyű, Balázs, Czárán, Tamás·2013·BMC Evolutionary Biology

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The coexistence of macromolecular replicators and thus the stability of presumed prebiotic replicator communities have been shown to critically depend on spatially constrained catalytic cooperation among RNA-like modular replicators. The necessary spatial constraints might have been supplied by mineral surfaces initially, preceding the more effective compartmentalization in membrane vesicles which must have been a later development of chemical evolution. RESULTS: Using our surface-bound RNA world model - the Metabolic Replicator Model (MRM) platform - we show that the mobilities on the mineral substrate surface of both the macromolecular replicators and the small molecules of metabolites they produce catalytically are the key factors determining the stable persistence of an evolvable metabolic replicator community. CONCLUSION: The effects of replicator mobility and metabolite diffusion on different aspects of replicator coexistence in MRM are determined, including the maximum attainable size of the metabolic replicator system and its resistance to the invasion of parasitic replicators. We suggest a chemically plausible hypothetical scenario for the evolution of the first protocell starting from the surface-bound MRM system.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2148-13-204

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • MCRS models have shown robust ecological stability against changing replicator degradation rates, applying both sequence-length-dependent and -independent decay rates.

    “The MCRS models have shown robust ecological stability against changing the replicator degradation rates (which correspond to environmental perturbations), by applying both sequence-length-dependent and -independent decay rates [33,36].”

    From Ecology and Evolution in the RNA World Dynamics and Stability of Prebiotic Replicator Systems (2017) · cites this paper as [36]

    The Results (page not available) state that the study varied spatial parameters while keeping other parameters constant, including the decay rate at d = 0.2. The Methods describe decay probability as constant. The reported robustness concerns persistence across repeated runs, not stability under changing degradation rates or a comparison of sequence-length-dependent and -independent decay. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The stochastic lattice implementation of the spatially explicit MCRS model keeps all metabolic replicators coexistent and shows robust ecological stability.

    “Unlike the mean-field version, the stochastic (lattice) implementation of the spatially explicit MCRS model keeps all the metabolic replicators coexistent and shows robust ecological stability (Figure 9) [33,36,37].”
  • The MCRS models offer a chemically and ecologically feasible spatial mechanism for robust maintenance of a metabolically active set of different ribozymes attached to mineral surfaces.

    “The growing family of the Metabolically Coupled Replicator System (MCRS) models offer a chemically and ecologically feasible spatial mechanism for the robust maintenance of a metabolically active set of different ribozymes attached to mineral surfaces”
  • Toy versions of MCRS have capacity to maintain diversity at about order of ten different replicators, but chemically more explicit versions have not yet been studied from this aspect.

    “The toy-versions of the MCRS model have a capacity to maintain diversity at about the order of ten different replicators [36] but the chemically more explicit—and dynamically more stable—versions have not yet been studied from this aspect.”
  • The ecological stability and parasite resistance of MCRS is spectacular at a substantial range of its parameter space, but the number of metabolically essential replicator species sustainable by its diffuse group selection mechanism is always limited.

    “The ecological stability and the parasite resistance of the MCRS is spectacular at a substantial range of its parameter space but the number s of metabolically essential replicator species sustainable by its simple diffuse group selection mechanism is always limited [36].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Case TJ An illustrated guide to theroetical ecology 2000 New York: Oxford University Press
  2. Eigen M Schuster P The hypercycle 1979 Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer-Verlag

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Könnyű, B., & Czárán, T.
Affiliations
Eötvös Loránd University (HU)
Corresponding author
Könnyű, Balázs
Venue
BMC Evolutionary Biology
Published
2013
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
204
ISSN
1471-2148 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2019969279
Cited by
25
References
49
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 4
FWCI
1.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Evolutionary Biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ELTE Digital Institutional Repository (EDIT) (Eötvös Loránd University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • European Commission (225167)
  • Hungarian Scientific Research Fund (K100806)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
prebiotic chemistry, RNA world, community stability, mineral surfaces, metabolite diffusion, compartmentalization, chemical evolution
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Biological Evolution, Models, Biological, RNA

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review