Estimating demographic parameters using hidden process dynamic models
Open accessAbstract
Structured population models are widely used in plant and animal demographic studies to assess population dynamics. In matrix population models, populations are described with discrete classes of individuals (age, life history stage or size). To calibrate these models, longitudinal data are collected at the individual level to estimate demographic parameters. However, several sources of uncertainty can complicate parameter estimation, such as imperfect detection of individuals inherent to monitoring in the wild and uncertainty in assigning a state to an individual. Here, we show how recent statistical models can help overcome these issues. We focus on hidden process models that run two time series in parallel, one capturing the dynamics of the true states and the other consisting of observations arising from these underlying possibly unknown states. In a first case study, we illustrate hidden Markov models with an example of how to accommodate state uncertainty using Frequentist theory and maximum likelihood estimation. In a second case study, we illustrate state-space models with an example of how to estimate lifetime reproductive success despite imperfect detection, using a Bayesian framework and Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation. Hidden process models are a promising tool as they allow population biologists to cope with process variation while simultaneously accounting for observation error.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Goodness-of-fit testing using U-CARE indicated little evidence for overdispersion (ĉ = 1.11).
“We implemented our multistate models in a hidden Markov models framework [33] using program E-SURGE v1.9.0 [34] and tested for goodness-of-fit using U-CARE v2.2.3, which indicated little evidence for overdispersion (ĉ = 1.11).”
From Hand-Rearing, Release and Survival of African Penguin Chicks Abandoned Before Independence by Moulting Parents (2014) · cites this paper as [33]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Toni, T., Welch, D., Strelkowa, N., Ipsen, A., & Stumpf, M. P. H. (2009) · Journal of The Royal Society Interface · doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0172 · Cited by 1,498 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Buoro, M., Prévost, E. and O. Gimenez (2010). Investigating evolutionary trade-offs in wild populations of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar): incorporating detection probabilities and individual heterogeneity. Evolution 64: 2629-2642 Calvert, A., S. Bonner, I. Jonsen, J. Flemming, S. Walde, and P. Taylor. 2009. A hierarchical Bayesian approach to multi-state mark-recapture: simulations and applications. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:610-620. Caswell, H., Matrix population models: Construction, analysis and interpretation. Second Edition . 2001, Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. Caswell, H. & Fujiwara, M. (2004) Beyond survival estimation: mark-recapture, matrix population models, and population dynamics. Animal Biodiversity and Conservation 27.1:471-488. Choquet, R. 2008. Automatic generation of multistate capture-recapture models. The Canadian Journal of Statistics 36:1-15. Choquet R., Rouan L. & Pradel R. (2009). Program E-SURGE: a software application for fitting multievent models. In: Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations (eds. Thomson DL, Cooch EG & Conroy MJ). Springer Berlin, Germany, pp. 845-865. Clark, J. S., G. Ferraz, N. Oguge, H. Hays, and J. Dicostanzo. 2005. Hierarchical bayes for structured, variable populations: from recapture data to life-history prediction. Ecology 86:2232-2244. Clobert J. and Lebreton J.-D. (1987). About recent research in models for mark-recapture and mark-resighting data. A reply to C. Brownie. Biometrics 43:1019-1022. Clobert, J., Lebreton, J.-D., Allaine, D. & Gaillard, J.M. (1994) The estimation of age-specific breeding probabilities from recaptures or resightings of marked animals. II Longitudinal models. Biometrics 50:375-387. Reproductive Success. Studies of Individual Variation in
- Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1988). Contrasting Breeding Systems . University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
- Conn, P.B. and E.G. Cooch. (2009) Multistate capture-recapture analysis under imperfect state observation: an application to disease models. Journal of Applied Ecology 46, 486-492.
- Desprez, M. R. Pradel, E. Cam, J.-Y. Monnat & O. Gimenez (2011). Now you see him, now you don't: Experience, not age, is related to reproduction in Kittiwakes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 278:3060-3066
- Diekmann, O. and Heesterbeek, J.A.P. (2000) Mathematical Epidemiology of Infectious Diseases: Model Building, Analysis and Interpretation . Wiley, New York.
- Effects of age and body weight on the proportion of females breeding in a population of 2 roe deer (Capreolus capreolus). Canadian Journal of Zoology 70:1541-1545. 3
- Gaillard, J. M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Delorme, D., and Jorgenson, J. (2000). Body mass and 6 individual fitness in female ungulates: bigger is not always better. Proceedings of the 7 Royal Society of London, Series B 267:471-477. 8
- Gelman, A. 1996. Inference and monitoring convergence. Pages 131-143 in W. R. Gilks, S.
- Gimenez, O., V. Rossi, R. Choquet, C. Dehais, B. Doris, H. Varella, J.-P. Vila, and R. Pradel. (2007). State-space modelling of data on marked individuals. Ecological Modelling 206:431-438. Gimenez, O. (2008). Discussion: Towards a Bayesian analysis template? The Canadian Journal of Statistics 36: 21-24. Gimenez, O., A. Viallefont, A. Charmantier, R. Pradel, E. Cam, C. R. Brown, M. D. Anderson, M. Bomberger Brown, R. Covas, J.-M. Gaillard (2008). The risk of flawed inference in evolutionary studies when detectability is less than one. The American Naturalist 172:441448. Gimenez, O., Morgan, B.J.T. and S.P. Brooks (2009). Weak Identifiability in Models for MarkRecapture-Recovery Data.In Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations. Thomson, D. L.; Cooch, E. G.; Conroy, M. J. (Eds.). Springer Series: Environmental and Ecological Statistics, Vol. 3, pages 1055-1067. Gimenez, O. and R. Choquet (2010) Incorporating individual heterogeneity in studies on marked animals using numerical integration: capture-recapture mixed models. Ecology 91: 951-957 Hestbeck, J.B., Nichols, J.D. and Malecki, R. (1991) Estimates of movement and site fidelity using mark-resight data of wintering canada geese. Ecology 72:523-533 Jolly, G.M. (1965) Explicit estimates from capture-recapture data with both death and immigration-stochastic model. Biometrika 52:225-247 double-marking, live and dead encounters, and heterogeneity of reporting due to auxiliary
- Juillet C., Choquet R., Gauthier G. and Pradel R. (2011). A capture-recapture model with mark loss. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 16:88-104 Kendall, W.L. and Bjorkland, R. (2001) Using open robust design models to estimate temporary emigration from capture-recapture data. Biometrics 57:1113-1122
- Kéry, M. and Schaub, M. 2011. Bayesian population analysis using WinBUGS - a hierarchical 3 perspective . Academic Press. 4
- Lebreton, J. -D., J. D. Nichols, R. J. Barker, R. Pradel, and J. A. Spendelow. 2009. Modeling individual animal histories with multistate capture-recapture models. Pages 87-173 in H. Caswell, editor. Advances in Ecological Research, 41. Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
- Lele, S. R., B. Dennis, and F. Lutscher (2007). Data cloning: easy maximum likelihood estimation for complex ecological models using Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo methods. Ecology Letters 10:551-563.
- McCarthy, M. A. (2007) Bayesian methods for ecology . Cambridge University Press, 6
- McGraw, J. B. and Caswell, H. (1996). Estimation of individual fitness from life-history data. 8
- Newton, I., ed. (1989) Lifetime Reproduction in Birds . Academic Press, London. 15
- Papadatou, E., R. Pradel, M. Schaub, D. Dolch, H. Geiger, C. Ibañez, G. Kerth, A. Popa1 Lisseanu, W. Schorcht, J. Teubner and O. Gimenez (2011). Comparing survival among 2 species with imperfect detection using multilevel analysis of mark-recapture data: a case 3 study on bats. Ecography [doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2011.07084.x] 4 Papaïx, J., S. Cubaynes, M. Buoro, A. Charmantier, P. Perret and O. Gimenez (2010). 5 Combining capture-recapture data and pedigree information to assess heritability of 6 demographic parameters in the wild. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23: 2176-2184 7 Péron, G., Y. Ferrand, F. Gossmann, C. Bastat, M. Guenezan and O. Gimenez (2011). 8 Nonparametric spatial regression of survival probability: visualization of population sinks 9 in Eurasian Woodcock. Ecology [doi:10.1890/10-2224.1] 10 Péron G., Crochet P.A., Choquet R., Pradel R., Lebreton J.-D. and Gimenez O. (2010). 11 Capture-recapture models with heterogeneity to study survival senescence in the wild. 12 Oikos 119:524-532. 13 Péron G., Lebreton J.D. & Crochet P.A (2010). Breeding dispersal in black-headed gull: the 14 value of familiarity in a contrasted environment. Journal of Animal Ecology 79:317-326. 15 Plummer, M. (2003). JAGS: A Program for Analysis of Bayesian Graphical Models Using 16 Gibbs Sampling, Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Distributed Statistical 17 Computing (DSC 2003), March 20-22, Vienna, Austria. ISSN 1609-395X. 18 Pradel, R. and Lebreton, J.-D. (1999) Comparison of different approaches to study the local 19 recruitment of breeders. Bird Study 46:74-81. 20 Pradel R. (2005). Multievent: an extension of multistate Capture-Recapture Models to 21 uncertain states. Biometrics 61:442-447. 22 Pradel R. (2009). The stakes of capture-recapture models with state uncertainty. In: Modeling 23 Demographic Processes in Marked Populations (eds. Thomson DL, Cooch EG & Conroy 24 MJ). Springer Berlin, Germany, pp. 781-795. 25 · DOI
- Pradel R., Choquet R., Lima M.A., Merritt J.F. & Crespin L. (2010). Estimating population growth rate from capture-recapture data in presence of capture heterogeneity. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 15:248-258.
- Rouan L., Choquet R. & Pradel R. (2009a). A general framework for modeling memory in capture-recapture data. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 14:338-355.
- Rouan L., Gaillard J.-M., Y. Guédon & Pradel R. (2009b). Estimation of Lifetime Reproductive Success When Reproductive Status Cannot Always Be Assessed. In: Modeling Demographic Processes in Marked Populations (eds. Thomson DL, Cooch EG & Conroy MJ). Springer Berlin, Germany, pp. 867-879.
- Royle, J. A. and Dorazio, R. M. 2008. Hierarchical modelling and inference in ecology . Academic Press.
- Schofield, M. R. and R. J. Barker. 2008. A Unified Capture-Recapture Framework. Journal of
- Schofield, M. R. and R. J. Barker. 2011. Full open population capture-recapture models with 3 individual covariates. Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics 4
- Tavecchia, G., J. Adrover, A. Muñoz Navarro, and R. Pradel (2012). Modelling mortality causes in longitudinal data in the presence of tag loss: application to raptor poisoning and electrocution. Journal of Applied Ecology 49:297-305
- de Valpine, P. 2011. Frequentist analysis of hierarchical models for population dynamics and 1 demographic data. Journal of Ornithology doi: 10.1007/s10336-010-0642-5. 2 · DOI
- Williams, B.K., Nichols, J.D. and Conroy, M.J. (2002) Analysis and management of animal 8 populations . Academic Press, San Diego. 9
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sherley, R. B., Waller, L. J., Strauss, V., Geldenhuys, D., Underhill, L. G., & Parsons, N. J. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0110794 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gimenez, O., Lebreton, J.-D., Gaillard, J.-M., Choquet, R., & Pradel, R.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Lyon 1 Université (FR)
- Venue
- Theoretical Population Biology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 82
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-316
- ISSN
- 0040-5809 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2105729360
- Cited by
- 86
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
- FWCI
- 6.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hal.science
- Licence
- Locations
- Theoretical Population Biology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-08-JCJC-0028)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
- Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Census and Population Estimation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- demographic parameter estimation, hidden Markov models, state-space model, structured population models, matrix population models, imperfect detection, state uncertainty, lifetime reproductive success, observation error, population dynamics
- MeSH terms
- Linear Models
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review