Root developmental adaptation to phosphate starvation: better safe than sorry
Abstract
Phosphorus is a crucial component of major organic molecules such as nucleic acids, ATP and membrane phospholipids. It is present in soils in the form of inorganic phosphate (Pi), which has low availability and poor mobility. To cope with Pi limitations, plants have evolved complex adaptive responses that include morphological and physiological modifications. This review describes how the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana adapts its root system architecture to phosphate deficiency through inhibition of primary root growth, increase in lateral root formation and growth and production of root hairs, which all promote topsoil foraging. A better understanding of plant adaptation to low phosphate will open the way to increased phosphorus use efficiency by crops. Such an improvement is needed in order to adjust how we manage limited phosphorus stocks and to reduce the disastrous environmental effects of phosphate fertilizers overuse.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Environment: The disappearing nutrient
Gilbert, N. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/461716a · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Root system architecture: insights from <i>Arabidopsis</i> and cereal crops
Smith, S., & De Smet, I. (2012) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0234 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
Root Architecture Responses: In Search of Phosphate
Péret, B., Desnos, T., Jost, R., Kanno, S., Berkowitz, O., & Nussaume, L. (2014) · Plant Physiology · doi:10.1104/pp.114.244541 · Cited by 292 · see citing works
Self-citationTeichmann, T., & Muhr, M. (2015) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2015.00233 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
“These changes in root morphology increase phosphate uptake from soil layers that are enriched in phosphate (Peret et al., 2011; Niu et al., 2013; Hunter et al., 2014).”
Background
- Authors
- Péret, B., Clément, M., Nussaume, L., & Desnos, T.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- Corresponding author
- Péret, Benjamin
- Venue
- Trends in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2011-08
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 442-450
- ISSN
- 1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2007527680
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 58 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 18
- FWCI
- 2.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Trends in Plant Science (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant nutrient uptake and metabolism
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Waste Management and Disposal › Phosphorus and nutrient management
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Parasitism and Resistance
- Keywords
- phosphate limitation, root architecture, phosphorus use efficiency, lateral root formation, root hair development, Arabidopsis thaliana, phosphorus fertilizer
- MeSH terms
- Adaptation, Physiological, Fertilizers, Phosphates, Phosphorus, Arabidopsis, Gene Expression Regulation, Plant, Plant Roots, Arabidopsis Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review