Cited by 252Ecosystem dynamics and resilienceEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesPlant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics

Alternative Biome States in Terrestrial Ecosystems

Pausas, Juli G., Bond, William J.·2020·Trends in Plant Science

Abstract

There is growing interest in the application of alternative stable state (ASS) theory to explain major vegetation patterns of the world. Here, we introduce the theory as applied to the puzzle of nonforested (open) biomes growing in climates that are warm and wet enough to support forests (alternative biome states, ABSs). Long thought to be the product of deforestation, diverse lines of evidence indicate that many open ecosystems are ancient. They have also been characterized as 'early successional' even where they persist for millennia. ABS is an alternative framework to that of climate determinism and succession for exploring forest/nonforest mosaics. This framework explains not only tropical forest-savanna landscapes, but also other landscape mosaics across the globe.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.11.003

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Burning shifts the ecosystem to a more flammable, non-forest state, which is perpetuated through a positive feedback with fire.

    “Burning then shifts the ecosystem to a more flammable, non-forest state (Pausas & Bond, 2020), which is perpetuated through a positive feedback with fire (Paritsis, Veblen, & Holz, 2015;Tepley, Veblen, Perry, Stewart, & Naficy, 2016).”

    From Fire as a fundamental ecological process: Research advances and frontiers (2020) · cites this paper as Pausas & Bond, 2020

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pausas, J. G., & Bond, W. J.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
Corresponding author
Pausas, Juli G.
Venue
Trends in Plant Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-03
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
250-263
ISSN
1360-1385 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2998387399
Cited by
252
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 44 · 2024: 45 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 33 · 2020: 27
FWCI
1.79
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Plant Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIGITAL.CSIC (Spanish National Research Council (CSIC)) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • FILAS (CGL2015-64086-P)
  • FIROTIC (PGC2018-096569-B-I00)
  • FOCSEC (PROMETEO/2016/021)
  • Generalitat Valenciana
  • Andrew Mellon Foundation
  • National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Ecosystem dynamics and resilience
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
Keywords
alternative stable states, climate determinism, vegetation patterns, deforestation
MeSH terms
Climate, Conservation of Natural Resources, Trees, Ecosystem, Forests

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review