The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Much of the current literature looks to explain the barriers that individual consumers encounter when purchasing EVs, either using qualitative methods or choice experiments.
“As such, much of the current literature looks to explain the barriers that individual consumers encounter when purchasing EVs, either using qualitative methods (Egbue and Long, 2012;Schuitema et al., 2013;Franke and Krems, 2013), or also commonly, choice experiments to analyze willingness-to-pay for electric vehicles (Jensen et al., 2013;Noel et al., 2019;Hidrue et al., 2011).”
From Understanding the socio-technical nexus of Nordic electric vehicle (EV) barriers: A qualitative discussion of range, price, charging and knowledge (2020) · cites this paper as Schuitema et al., 2013
The Introduction (p. 4) says the paper examines how private consumers’ perceptions of EV attributes influence adoption, which supports the consumer-barriers aspect of the claim. But Schuitema et al. is cited specifically as an example of qualitative methods, whereas the Method (pp. 12–13) describes a two-wave online survey of 2,728 participants. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587 · see citing works
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008) · Behavior Research Methods · doi:10.3758/brm.40.3.879 · Cited by 34,117 · see citing works
SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models
Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2004) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03206553 · Cited by 17,383 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
McLean, G., & Osei-Frimpong, K. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.009 · Cited by 762 · see citing works
Chen, C.-F., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Noel, L., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2019.109692 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Noel, L., Zarazua de Rubens, G., Kester, J., & Sovacool, B. K. (2020) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111292 · Cited by 189 · see citing works
Factors affecting adoption intention of electric vehicle: a cross-cultural study
Higueras-Castillo, E., Singh, V., Singh, V., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. (2023) · Environment, Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03865-y · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Does the electric vehicle industry help achieve sustainable development goals?—evidence from China
Lu, P., Hamori, S., Sun, L., & Tian, S. (2024) · Frontiers in Environmental Science · doi:10.3389/fenvs.2023.1276382 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N.
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Shell (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Transport Research Laboratory (United Kingdom) (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schuitema, Geertje
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-02
- Volume
- 48
- Pages
- 39-49
- ISSN
- 0965-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1982275550
- Cited by
- 722
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 33 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 80 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 77 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 50 · 2018: 56 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 9.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice (publishedVersion)
- White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Aberdeen University Research Archive (Aberdeen University) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Acceptance of Renewable Energy
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
- Keywords
- electric vehicles, technology adoption intention, hedonic attributes, symbolic attributes, pro-environmental self-identity, private car drivers, self-image
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
