Another one rides the bus? The connections between bus stop amenities, bus ridership, and ADA paratransit demand
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Kim et al. (2020) using propensity score matching found that bus stops with improved amenities were associated with a significant increase in ridership in Salt Lake County; possible differences in impact by amenity type were not assessed.
“Another study (Kim et al., 2020) using propensity score matching found that bus stops with improved amenities were associated with a significant increase in ridership in Salt Lake County; possible differences in impact by amenity type were not assessed.”
From Does improving stop amenities help increase Bus Rapid Transit ridership? Findings based on a quasi-experiment (2021) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2020
Except for Kim et al.'s study (2020), studies of bus stop amenities used cross-sectional data.
“Moreover, in the literature we reviewed, except for Kim et al.'s study (2020), studies of bus stop amenities used cross-sectional data.”
From Does improving stop amenities help increase Bus Rapid Transit ridership? Findings based on a quasi-experiment (2021) · cites this paper as Kim et al., 2020
In Kim et al.'s study (2020), an average of 141% increase in boardings was observed for stops with amenity improvement, compared to those without.
“in Kim et al.'s study (2020), an average of 141% increase in boardings was observed for stops with amenity improvement, compared to those without.”
From Does improving stop amenities help increase Bus Rapid Transit ridership? Findings based on a quasi-experiment (2021) · cites this paper as Kim et al. (2020)
Cites
Quasi-experimental designs for causal inference
Kim, Y., & Steiner, P. (2016) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2016.1207177 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Shi, X., Moudon, A. V., Hurvitz, P. M., Mooney, S. J., Zhou, C., & Saelens, B. E. (2021) · Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives · doi:10.1016/j.trip.2021.100323 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kim, J. Y., Bartholomew, K., & Ewing, R.
- ORCID
- Kim, Ja Young
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-05
- Volume
- 135
- Pages
- 280-288
- ISSN
- 0965-8564
- Cited by
- 21
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Utah Department of Transportation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
