How governments influence autonomous vehicle (AV) innovation
Open accessAbstract
While autonomous vehicle (AV) technology is forecast to widely disrupt transport systems, governments’ roles in influencing innovation have not been examined holistically. This empirical study analyses the perceptions of 34 professionals from government and non-government actors in the U.K. and Australian contexts. Our findings identify three main categories of government roles: regulator, facilitator and participator and illustrate how different policy mechanisms align within this framework to shape AV innovation. The paper discusses the implications of the interrelationships between these roles within each context, as well as how governments can apply them to pursue transport policy goals. This research provides an important contribution to understanding how local policy environments around the world might shape the development and eventual implementation of AV technologies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Alternative strategies may be required in legislative frameworks that approve the use of AVs.
“Furthermore, alternative strategies may be required to be used by legislative frameworks that approve the use of AVs [12][13][14].”
From Assessing the Role of Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Literature (2024) · cites this paper as [12]
Cites
Considering quality in qualitative interviewing
Roulston, K. (2010) · Qualitative Research · doi:10.1177/1468794109356739 · Cited by 535 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assessing the Role of Autonomous Vehicles in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Literature
Makahleh, H. Y., Ferranti, E. J. S., & Dissanayake, D. (2024) · Future Transportation · doi:10.3390/futuretransp4020017 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schepis, D., Purchase, S., Olaru, D., Smith, B., & Ellis, N.
- Affiliations
- The University of Western Australia (AU)
- Durham University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Schepis, Daniel
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2023-12
- Volume
- 178
- Pages
- 103874
- ISSN
- 0965-8564 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4388257371
- Cited by
- 33
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 2.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
- Durham Research Online (Durham University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- UWA Profiles and Research Repository (University of Western Australia) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Autonomous Vehicle Technology and Safety
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, role of the state, transport policy, innovation policy, regulation, facilitation, stakeholder perspectives, policy mechanisms, transport disruption, United Kingdom, Australia
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review