Cited by 49Air Traffic Management and OptimizationAdvanced Aircraft Design and TechnologiesRailway Systems and Energy Efficiency

Air traffic management performance assessment using flight inefficiency metrics

Reynolds, Tom G.·2014·Transport Policy

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.02.019

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reynolds, T. G.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Reynolds, Tom G.
Venue
Transport Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-07
Volume
34
Pages
63-74
ISSN
0967-070X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056597775
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
5.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Transport Policy (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NERC)
  • Sir Arthur Marshall Institute for Aeronautics (SAMIA)
  • European Commission funding, IAGOS and ETHER Research Institutes
  • Institute for Aviation and Environment at the University of Cambridge
  • Air Traffic Control Systems Group
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Air Traffic Management and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Advanced Aircraft Design and Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering › Railway Systems and Energy Efficiency
Keywords
air traffic management, fuel burn, flight path, aviation climate impact, flight phases

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review