Cited by 86Railway Engineering and DynamicsInfrastructure Maintenance and MonitoringTransportation Systems and Safety

A decision support approach for condition-based maintenance of rails based on big data analysis

Open access
Jamshidi, Ali, Hajizadeh, Siamak, Su, Zhou, Naeimi, Meysam, Núñez, Alfredo, Dollevoet, Rolf, De Schutter, Bart, Li, Zili·2018·Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trc.2018.07.007

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ML can help improve operation of low-carbon modes, for example by reducing rail operations and maintenance costs and predicting track degradation.

    “ML can also help to improve the operation of low-carbon modes, for example, by reducing the operations and maintenance costs of rail [383] and predicting track degradation [746].”

    From Tackling climate change with machine learning (2023) · cites this paper as [383]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Veit, P., 2007. Track quality-luxury or necessity. In: Railway Technical Review Special: Maintenance and Renewal, pp. 8-12.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jamshidi, A., Hajizadeh, S., Su, Z., Naeimi, M., Núñez, A., Dollevoet, R., De Schutter, B., & Li, Z.
Affiliations
Delft University of Technology (NL)
Corresponding author
Núñez, Alfredo
Venue
Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-10
Volume
95
Pages
185-206
ISSN
0968-090X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2884826024
Cited by
86
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 10
FWCI
3.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
  • Research Repository (Delft University of Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • NWO/ProRail project (438-12-300)
  • Ministry of Economic Affairs (12235)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Railway Engineering and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Infrastructure Maintenance and Monitoring
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Transportation Systems and Safety
Keywords
condition-based maintenance, rails, expert systems, axle box acceleration, rail surface defects, video image analysis, big data, railway infrastructure management, decision support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review