The DOI matches its Crossref record.
What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft
Abstract
Abstract The availability of ridehailing services, such as those provided by Uber and Lyft in the U.S. market, as well as the share of trips made by these services, are continuously growing. Yet, the factors affecting the frequency of use of these services are not well understood. In this paper, we investigate how the frequency of use of ridehailing varies across segments of the California population and under various circumstances. We analyze data from the California Millennials Dataset (N = 1975), collected in fall 2015 through an online survey administered to both millennials and members of the preceding Generation X. We estimate an ordered probit model with sample selection and a zero-inflated ordered probit model with correlated error terms to distinguish the factors affecting the frequency of use of ridehailing from those affecting the adoption of these services. The results are consistent across models: sociodemographic variables are important predictors of service adoption but do not explain much of the variation in the frequency of use. Land use mix and activity density respectively decrease and increase the frequency of ridehailing. The results also confirm that individuals who frequently use smartphone apps to manage other aspects of their travel (e.g. to select a route or check traffic) are more likely to adopt ridehailing and use it more often. This is also true for long-distance travelers, in particular, those who frequently travel by plane for leisure purposes. Individuals with higher willingness to pay to reduce their travel time use ridehailing more often. Those with stronger preferences to own a personal vehicle and those with stronger concerns about the safety/security of ridehailing are less likely to be frequent users. These results provide new insights into the adoption and use of ridehailing that could help to inform planning and forecasting efforts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Garrow, L. A., German, B. J., & Leonard, C. E. (2021) · Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1016/j.trc.2021.103377 · Cited by 488
Ride-hailing, travel behaviour and sustainable mobility: an international review
Tirachini, A. (2020) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-019-10070-2 · Cited by 470
Spatio-temporal analysis of on-demand transit: A case study of Belleville, Canada
Sanaullah, I., Alsaleh, N., Djavadian, S., & Farooq, B. (2021) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2021.01.020 · Cited by 299
Xu, M., & Lin, B. (2020) · Environmental Impact Assessment Review · doi:10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106377 · Cited by 80
Hossain, S., Loa, P., Ong, F., & Habib, K. N. (2022) · Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice · doi:10.1016/j.tra.2022.10.010 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Alemi, F., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-05
- Volume
- 102
- Pages
- 233-248
- ISSN
- 0968-090X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2924096405
- Cited by
- 232
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.016
- The paper
- Alemi, F., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S. (2019). What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.