The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Privacy-preserving adaptive traffic signal control in a connected vehicle environment
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A traffic signal control framework for connected autonomous vehicles (CAV) was proposed in [135]. The framework integrates SMPC and DP to protect CAV data against three types of privacy threats: collusion attacks, control center database attacks, and inference attacks.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [135]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“The framework used a linear programming model and arrival rate estimator to ensure efficiency in varying traffic scenarios. A two-stage stochastic programming model mitigates DP-induced noise impacts on performance.”
From Privacy-preserving Machine Learning in Internet of Vehicle Applications: Fundamentals, Recent Advances, and Future Direction (2025) · cites this paper as [135]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Privacy-preserving data publishing: A survey of recent developments
Fung, B. C. M., Wang, K., Chen, R., & Yu, P. S. (2010) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/1749603.1749605 · Cited by 1,704 · cited 1×
“…to protect against inference attacks, i.e., the limitations of most traditional mechanisms (e.g., anonymization-and aggregation-based mechanisms) in which an adversary may obtain private information by analyzing the changes in the query results, possibly with the help of external datasets [39].”
BackgroundSecure Multi-Party Computation: Theory, practice and applications
Zhao, C., Zhao, S., Zhao, M., Chen, Z., Gao, C.-Z., Li, H., & Tan, Y.-A. (2019) · Information Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.ins.2018.10.024 · Cited by 508
Research works printed but not linked: 32
- Abdelkader, 2021, Connected vehicles: Technology review, state of the art, challenges and opportunities, Sensors, 21, 7712, 10.3390/s21227712 · DOI
- Bénichou, 1977, The efficient solution of large-scale linear programming problems—some algorithmic techniques and computational results, Math. Program., 13, 280, 10.1007/BF01584344 · DOI
- Beresford, 2003, Location privacy in pervasive computing, IEEE Pervasive Comput., 2, 46, 10.1109/MPRV.2003.1186725 · DOI
- Chen, 2016, An improved adaptive signal control method for isolated signalized intersection based on dynamic programming, IEEE Intell. Transp. Syst. Mag., 8, 4
- Cottrill, 2009, Approaches to privacy preservation in intelligent transportation systems and vehicle–infrastructure integration initiative, Transp. Res. Record, 2129, 9, 10.3141/2129-02 · DOI
- Deng, 2023, Cooperative platoon formation of connected and autonomous vehicles: Toward efficient merging coordination at unsignalized intersections, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 10.1109/TITS.2023.3235774 · DOI
- Denning, 1979, The tracker: A threat to statistical database security, ACM Trans. Database Syst., 4, 76, 10.1145/320064.320069 · DOI
- Dewri, 2012, Local differential perturbations: Location privacy under approximate knowledge attackers, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 12, 2360, 10.1109/TMC.2012.208 · DOI
- Eckhoff, 2011, Slotswap: Strong and affordable location privacy in intelligent transportation systems, IEEE Commun. Mag., 49, 126, 10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069719 · DOI
- Feng, 2015, A real-time adaptive signal control in a connected vehicle environment, Transp. Res. C, 55, 460, 10.1016/j.trc.2015.01.007 · DOI
- Goryczka, 2015, A comprehensive comparison of multiparty secure additions with differential privacy, IEEE Trans. Dependable Secur. Comput., 14, 463, 10.1109/TDSC.2015.2484326 · DOI
- Guo, 2019, Urban traffic signal control with connected and automated vehicles: A survey, Transp. Res. C, 101, 313, 10.1016/j.trc.2019.01.026 · DOI
- Huang, 2019, Exploring individual travel patterns across private car trajectory data, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 21, 5036, 10.1109/TITS.2019.2948188 · DOI
- Kalnis, 2007, Preventing location-based identity inference in anonymous spatial queries, IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., 19, 1719, 10.1109/TKDE.2007.190662 · DOI
- Kartal, 2019, Differential privacy for the vast majority, ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst., 10, 1, 10.1145/3329717 · DOI
- Kim, 2022, Privacy-preserving mechanisms for location privacy in mobile crowdsensing: A survey, J. Netw. Comput. Appl., 10.1016/j.jnca.2021.103315 · DOI
- Kim, 2021, A survey of differential privacy-based techniques and their applicability to location-based services, Comput. Secur., 111, 10.1016/j.cose.2021.102464 · DOI
- Li, 2021, Social relationship inference over private vehicle mobility data, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 70, 5221, 10.1109/TVT.2021.3060787 · DOI
- Lustig, 1994, Interior point methods for linear programming: Computational state of the art, ORSA J. Comput., 6, 1, 10.1287/ijoc.6.1.1 · DOI
- Mishra, 2007, Extended protocol for secure multi-party computation using ambiguous identity, WSEAS Trans. Comput. Res., 2, 227
- Naveed, M., Kamara, S., Wright, C.V., 2015. Inference attacks on property-preserving encrypted databases. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. pp. 644–655. · DOI
- Ohm, 2009, Broken promises of privacy: Responding to the surprising failure of anonymization, UCLA l. Rev., 57, 1701
- Sun, 2013, Privacy protection method for fine-grained urban traffic modeling using mobile sensors, Transp. Res. B, 56, 50, 10.1016/j.trb.2013.07.010 · DOI
- Tan, 2022, Cumulative flow diagram estimation and prediction based on sampled vehicle trajectories at signalized intersections, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 23, 11325, 10.1109/TITS.2021.3102750 · DOI
- Tsao, 2022, Trust but verify: Cryptographic data privacy for mobility management, IEEE Trans. Control Netw. Syst., 9, 50, 10.1109/TCNS.2022.3141027 · DOI
- Wan, 2018, SMOPAT: Mining semantic mobility patterns from trajectories of private vehicles, Inform. Sci., 429, 12, 10.1016/j.ins.2017.10.043 · DOI
- Yang, 2016, Isolated intersection control for various levels of vehicle technology: Conventional, connected, and automated vehicles, Transp. Res. C, 72, 109, 10.1016/j.trc.2016.08.009 · DOI
- Yao, 2019, An optimization model for arterial coordination control based on sampled vehicle trajectories: The STREAM model, Transp. Res. C, 109, 211, 10.1016/j.trc.2019.10.014 · DOI
- Ying, 2022, PrivacySignal: Privacy-preserving traffic signal control for intelligent transportation system, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 10.1109/TITS.2022.3149600 · DOI
- Zhang, 2019, Cycle-based end of queue estimation at signalized intersections using low-penetration-rate vehicle trajectories, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 21, 3257, 10.1109/TITS.2019.2925111 · DOI
- Zhang, 2020, A decentralized location privacy-preserving spatial crowdsourcing for internet of vehicles, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 22, 2299, 10.1109/TITS.2020.3010288 · DOI · Paper page
- Zhao, 2010, A fast signal timing algorithm for individual oversaturated intersections, IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., 12, 280, 10.1109/TITS.2010.2076808 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Islam, N., & Zulkernine, M. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2503.01089 · Cited by 9
“Two popular aggregation algorithms are federated averaging (FedAvg) and federated distillation [12].”
Metadata
- Authors
- Tan, C., & Yang, K.
- Affiliations
- National University of Singapore (SG)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Kaidi
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2024-01
- Volume
- 158
- Pages
- 104453
- ISSN
- 0968-090X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4389636506
- Cited by
- 49
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 11
- FWCI
- 5.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transportation Research Part C Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Ministry of Education - Singapore (A-8000404-01-00)
- National University of Singapore
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Traffic control and management
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Keywords
- connected vehicles, secure multi-party computation, differential privacy, collusion attacks, inference attacks, database attacks, traffic signal optimization, arrival rate estimation, stochastic programming, queue reduction, vehicle delay, privacy-utility trade-off
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
