The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
Open accessAbstract
This paper examines the life-cycle inventory impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions as a result of candidate travelers adopting carsharing in US settings. Here, households residing in relatively dense urban neighborhoods with good access to transit and traveling relatively few miles in private vehicles (roughly 10% of the U.S. population) are considered candidates for carsharing. This analysis recognizes cradle-to-grave impacts of carsharing on vehicle ownership levels, travel distances, fleet fuel economy (partly due to faster turnover), parking demand (and associated infrastructure), and alternative modes. Results suggest that current carsharing members reduce their average individual transportation energy use and GHG emissions by approximately 51% upon joining a carsharing organization. Collectively, these individual-level effects translate to roughly 5% savings in all household transport-related energy use and GHG emissions in the U.S. These energy and emissions savings can be primarily attributed to mode shifts and avoided travel, followed by savings in parking infrastructure demands and fuel consumption. When indirect rebound effects are accounted for (assuming travel-cost savings is then spent on other goods and services), net savings are expected to be 3% across all U.S. households.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains
Chester, M. V., & Horvath, A. (2009) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008 · Cited by 592
Cited by
Putting the sharing economy into perspective
Frenken, K., & Schor, J. (2017) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003 · Cited by 1,105
Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters
Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8 · Cited by 401
Car-sharing services: An annotated review
Ferrero, F., Perboli, G., Rosano, M., & Vesco, A. (2018) · Sustainable Cities and Society · doi:10.1016/j.scs.2017.09.020 · Cited by 319
The potential of mobility as a service bundles as a mobility management tool
Matyas, M., & Kamargianni, M. (2019) · Transportation · doi:10.1007/s11116-018-9913-4 · Cited by 266
Enhanced Mobility With Connectivity and Automation: A Review of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Systems
Zhao, L., & Malikopoulos, A. A. (2022) · IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine · doi:10.1109/mits.2019.2953526 · Cited by 93
Metadata
- Authors
- Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M.
- Venue
- Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016-08
- Volume
- 47
- Pages
- 276-284
- ISSN
- 1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W815707761
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 14.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.012
- The paper
- Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.