The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 16 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters
Open accessAbstract
Shared stand-up electric scooters are now offered in many cities as an option for short-term rental, and marketed for short-distance travel. Using life cycle assessment, we quantify the total environmental impacts of this mobility option associated with global warming, acidification, eutrophication, and respiratory impacts. We find that environmental burdens associated with charging the e-scooter are small relative to materials and manufacturing burdens of the e-scooters and the impacts associated with transporting the scooters to overnight charging stations. The results of a Monte Carlo analysis show an average value of life cycle global warming impacts of 202 g CO 2-eq/passenger-mile, driven by materials and manufacturing (50%), followed by daily collection for charging (43% of impact). We illustrate the potential to reduce life cycle global warming impacts through improved scooter collection and charging approaches, including the use of fuel-efficient vehicles for collection (yielding 177 g CO 2-eq/passenger-mile), limiting scooter collection to those with a low battery state of charge (164 g CO 2-eq/passenger-mile), and reducing the driving distance per scooter for e-scooter collection and distribution (147 g CO 2-eq/passenger-mile). The results prove to be highly sensitive to e-scooter lifetime; ensuring that the shared e-scooters are used for two years decreases the average life cycle emissions to 141 g CO 2-eq/passenger-mile. Under our Base Case assumptions, we find that the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions associated with e-scooter use is higher in 65% of our Monte Carlo simulations than the suite of modes of transportation that are displaced. This likelihood drops to 35%–50% under our improved and efficient e-scooter collection processes and only 4% when we assume two-year e-scooter lifetimes. When e-scooter usage replaces average personal automobile travel, we nearly universally realize a net reduction in environmental impacts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative Environmental Life Cycle Assessment of Conventional and Electric Vehicles
Hawkins, T. R., Singh, B., Majeau‐Bettez, G., & Strømman, A. H. (2013) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1530-9290.2012.00532.x · Cited by 1,670
Examining different recycling processes for lithium-ion batteries
Ciez, R. E., & Whitacre, J. F. (2019) · Nature Sustainability · doi:10.1038/s41893-019-0222-5 · Cited by 965
Life cycle assessment of a lithium-ion battery vehicle pack
Ellingsen, L. A., Majeau‐Bettez, G., Singh, B., Srivastava, A. K., Valøen, L. O., & Strømman, A. H. (2014) · Journal of Industrial Ecology · doi:10.1111/jiec.12072 · Cited by 665
Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains
Chester, M. V., & Horvath, A. (2009) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008 · Cited by 592
Marginal Emissions Factors for the U.S. Electricity System
Siler-Evans, K., Azevedo, I. L., & Morgan, M. G. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es300145v · Cited by 345
Valuation of plug-in vehicle life-cycle air emissions and oil displacement benefits
Michalek, J. J., Chester, M., Jaramillo, P., Samaras, C., Shiau, C.-S. N., & Lave, L. B. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1104473108 · Cited by 278
Carsharing’s life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions
Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.012 · Cited by 257
Weiss, M., Dekker, P., Moro, A., Scholz, H., & Patel, M. K. (2015) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2015.09.007 · Cited by 243
Gawron, J. H., Keoleian, G. A., De Kleine, R. D., Wallington, T. J., & Kim, H. C. (2018) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.7b04576 · Cited by 217
Eckelman, M. J., Mauter, M. S., Isaacs, J. A., & Elimelech, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es203409a · Cited by 199
Cited by
Mode choice, substitution patterns and environmental impacts of shared and personal micro-mobility
Reck, D. J., Martin, H., & Axhausen, K. W. (2022) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2021.103134 · Cited by 253
da Costa, V. B. F., Bitencourt, L., Dias, B. H., Soares, T., de Andrade, J. V. B., & Bonatto, B. D. (2025) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2024.114988 · Cited by 43
Metadata
- Authors
- Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X.
- Venue
- Environmental Research Letters
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-08-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 084031
- ISSN
- 1748-9326 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2966590064
- Cited by
- 401
- References
- 16
- FWCI
- 17.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
- The paper
- Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.