Cited by 167Transportation Planning and OptimizationTransportation and Mobility InnovationsVehicle emissions and performance

Analysis of telecommuting behavior and impacts on travel demand and the environment

Open access
Shabanpour, Ramin, Golshani, Nima, Tayarani, Mohammad, Auld, Joshua, Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros)·2018·Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment

Abstract

Abstract The discussion of whether, and to what extent, telecommuting can curb congestion in urban areas has spanned more than three decades. This study develops an integrated framework to provide the empirical evidence of the potential impacts of home-based telecommuting on travel behavior, network congestion, and air quality. In the first step, we estimate a telecommuting adoption model using a zero-inflated hierarchical ordered probit model to determine the factors associated with workers’ propensity to adopt telecommuting. Second, we implement the estimated model in the POLARIS activity-based framework to simulate the potential changes in workers’ activity-travel patterns and network congestion. Third, the MOVES mobile source emission simulator and Autonomie vehicle energy simulator are used to estimate the potential changes in vehicular emissions and fuel use in the network as a result of this policy. Different policy adoption scenarios are then tested in the proposed integrated platform. We found that compared to the current baseline situation where almost 12% of workers in Chicago region have flexible working time schedule, in the case when 50% of workers have flexible working time, telecommuting can reduce total daily vehicle miles traveled (VMT) and vehicle hours traveled (VHT) up to 0.69% and 2.09%, respectively. Considering the same comparison settings, this policy has the potential to reduce greenhouse gas and particulate matter emissions by up to 0.71% and 1.14%, respectively. In summary, our results endorse the fact that telecommuting policy has the potential to reduce network congestion and vehicular emissions specifically during rush hours.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.003

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Shabanpour, R., Golshani, N., Tayarani, M., Auld, J., & Mohammadian, A. (.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of New Mexico (US)
  • Argonne National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Shabanpour, Ramin
Venue
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-07
Volume
62
Pages
563-576
ISSN
1361-9209 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804943360
Cited by
167
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment (acceptedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Department of Energy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Vehicle emissions and performance
Keywords
remote work, travel demand, network congestion, air quality, vehicle miles traveled, vehicle emissions, flexible working hours, activity-based travel demand modeling, greenhouse gas emissions, particulate matter, peak hours, Chicago metropolitan area

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review