Cited by 33Immunotherapy and Immune ResponsesCancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkersvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Learning from the Proteasome How To Fine-Tune Cancer Immunotherapy

Vigneron, Nathalie, Abi Habib, Joanna, Van den Eynde, Benoit J.·2017·Trends in Cancer

Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy has recently emerged as a forefront strategy to fight cancer. Key players in antitumor responses are CD8+ cytolytic T lymphocytes (CTLs) that can detect tumor cells that carry antigens, in other words, small peptides bound to surface major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I molecules. The success and safety of cancer immunotherapy strategies depends on the nature of the antigens recognized by the targeted T cells, their strict tumor specificity, and whether tumors and antigen-presenting cells can efficiently process the peptide. We review here the nature of the tumor antigens and their potential for the development of immunotherapeutic strategies. We also discuss the importance of proteasome in the production of these peptides in the context of immunotherapy and therapeutic cancer vaccines.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trecan.2017.07.007

Cites

94 of 94 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The greater hydrophobicity of bacterial peptides might make them preferable for antigen presentation and T cell recognition.

    “a property that might make these peptides preferable for antigen presentation16 and recognition by T cells17”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 96 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vigneron, N., Abi Habib, J., & Van den Eynde, B. J.
Affiliations
Ludwig Cancer Research (BE)
Corresponding author
Vigneron, Nathalie
Venue
Trends in Cancer
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
3
Issue
10
Pages
726-741
ISSN
  • 2405-8025 (ISSN-L)
  • 2405-8033
OpenAlex
W2748923852
Cited by
33
References
96
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
0.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in cancer (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Libraries (submittedVersion)
Funders
Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (7455115F)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
proteasome, cancer immunotherapy, tumor antigens, cytotoxic T lymphocytes, MHC class I, antigen processing, peptide presentation, therapeutic cancer vaccines, tumor specificity
MeSH terms
Animals, Antigens, Neoplasm, HLA Antigens, Humans, Immunotherapy, Neoplasms, T-Lymphocyte Subsets, Antigen Presentation, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Proteasome Endopeptidase Complex

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review