Cited by 73Graphene research and applicationsSynthesis and Properties of Aromatic CompoundsBoron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research

A new carbon allotrope: Graphdiyne

Zheng, Zhiqiang, Xue, Yurui, Li, Yuliang·2022·Trends in Chemistry

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trechm.2022.05.006

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 94 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zheng, Z., Xue, Y., & Li, Y.
Affiliations
Shandong University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Xue, Yurui
  • Li, Yuliang
Venue
Trends in Chemistry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-08
Volume
4
Issue
8
Pages
754-768
ISSN
2589-5974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4281758899
Cited by
73
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 9
FWCI
1.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Trends in Chemistry (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (21790050, 21790051, 22021002)
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB13)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFA0703501)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Graphene research and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Synthesis and Properties of Aromatic Compounds
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Boron and Carbon Nanomaterials Research
Keywords
graphdiyne, carbon allotropes, carbon materials, synthesis methods, energy applications, catalysis, photoelectric devices, electrochemical devices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review