Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 468

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 14 of the 14 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk

Open access
Steffan-Dewenter, Ingolf, Potts, Simon G., Packer, Laurence·2005·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

In a recent opinion article in TREE, Ghazoul [1] questionsthe existence of a global pollinator crisis and, in doing so,raises some important points about the uncertainty ofhuman dependence upon pollination services. We agreewith Ghazoul [1] that much uncertainty remains regard-ing pollinator–pollination declines. However, we thinkthat his assessment draws biased conclusions for polli-nator declines from existing studies, misrepresents theextent of agricultural reliance on animal pollination, andunderestimates the extent of pollination reduction inintensive monocultures.In his article [1], Ghazoul suggests that a pollinatorcrisisisdrivenmainlybyreporteddeclinesofhoneybeesinNorth America, and bumblebees and butterflies inEurope. However, local and regional declines of solitarywild bees, bumblebees and honeybees owing to habitatloss, agricultural intensification and pesticide use havebeen reported in both Europe and America [2–5], and theimpact of habitat loss, measured by species–area relation-ships, is much stronger for native bees than for otherinsect groups [6]. For genetic reasons alone, bees are moreextinction prone than are other taxa, because single-locussex determination makes them particularly sensitive tothe effects of small population size through the productionof sterile diploid males [7].Pollinators,otherthanhoneybees and bumblebees, have many Red Data Bookentries (e.g. for 11 European countries, an average of27.4% of the national bee fauna is listed

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.004

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 14 references

Cited by

See all 468

Metadata

Authors
Steffan-Dewenter, I., Potts, S. G., & Packer, L.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2005-12
Volume
20
Issue
12
Pages
651-652
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1977819884
Cited by
468
References
14
FWCI
17.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.004
The paper
Steffan-Dewenter, I., Potts, S. G., & Packer, L. (2005). Pollinator diversity and crop pollination services are at risk. Trends in Ecology & Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.09.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.