Cited by 989Parasite Biology and Host InteractionsEcology and Vegetation Dynamics StudiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Is a healthy ecosystem one that is rich in parasites?

Hudson, Peter J., Dobson, Andrew P., Lafferty, Kevin D.·2006·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Historically, the role of parasites in ecosystem functioning has been considered trivial because a cursory examination reveals that their relative biomass is low compared with that of other trophic groups. However there is increasing evidence that parasite-mediated effects could be significant: they shape host population dynamics, alter interspecific competition, influence energy flow and appear to be important drivers of biodiversity. Indeed they influence a range of ecosystem functions and have a major effect on the structure of some food webs. Here, we consider the bottom-up and top-down processes of how parasitism influences ecosystem functioning and show that there is evidence that parasites are important for biodiversity and production; thus, we consider a healthy system to be one that is rich in parasite species.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2006.04.007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The presence or absence of parasites dramatically alters species richness, consistently with their role in natural communities.

    “Here, the presence (figure 9a) or absence (figure 9b) of parasites dramatically alters species richness, consistently with their role in natural communities [339].”

    From Fundamental constraints to the logic of living systems (2024) · cites this paper as [339]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hudson, P. J., Dobson, A. P., & Lafferty, K. D.
Affiliations
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
  • Princeton University (US)
  • United States Geological Survey (US)
Corresponding author
Hudson, Peter J.
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-07
Volume
21
Issue
7
Pages
381-385
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2100179287
Cited by
989
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 61 · 2021: 93 · 2020: 60 · 2019: 55 · 2018: 61 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 42
FWCI
17.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Center For Environmental Assessment
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Parasite Biology and Host Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
parasites, ecosystem functioning, host population dynamics, interspecific competition, energy flow, biodiversity, food webs, bottom-up control, top-down control, parasite biomass
MeSH terms
Animals, Health, Host-Parasite Interactions, Parasites, Ecosystem, Evolution, Molecular, Food Chain, Biodiversity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review