Cited by 53Primate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and ReproductionAnimal Vocal Communication and Behavior

Recognising the key role of individual recognition in social networks

Gokcekus, Samin, Firth, Josh A., Regan, Charlotte, Sheldon, Ben C.·2021·Trends in Ecology & Evolution

Abstract

Many aspects of sociality rely on individuals recognising one another. Understanding how, when, and if individuals recognise others can yield insights into the foundations of social relationships and behaviours. Through synthesising individual recognition research in different sensory and social domains, and doing so across various related social contexts, we propose that a social network perspective can help to uncover how individual recognition may vary across different settings, species, and populations. Specifically, combining individual recognition with social networks has unrecognised potential for determining the level and relative importance of individual recognition complexity. This will provide insights not only on the ecology and evolution of individual recognition itself, but also on social structure, social transmission, and social interactions such as cooperation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tree.2021.06.009

Cites

85 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • It is likely necessary for elephants to be able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and remember previous social interactions, so that they can account for them in future interactions with the same individual.

    “This means that it is likely necessary for elephants to be able to discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar individuals and remember previous social interactions, so that they can account for them in future interactions with the same individual (Gokcekus et al., 2021; Wiley, 2013).”

    From Do elephants really never forget? What we know about elephant memory and a call for further investigation (2025) · cites this paper as Gokcekus et al., 2021

    The ‘Recent advances and general approaches in individual recognition’ section (p. 7) says that recalling information about individuals from previous interactions is important to many social behaviours. The social-network discussion (p. 15) also describes using another individual’s identity to adjust later behaviour. These passages support the general mechanism, but do not establish that it is necessary for elephants specifically. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gokcekus, S., Firth, J. A., Regan, C., & Sheldon, B. C.
Affiliations
University of Oxford (GB)
Corresponding author
Gokcekus, Samin
Venue
Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-11
Volume
36
Issue
11
Pages
1024-1035
ISSN
0169-5347 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3178355056
Cited by
53
References
85
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Trends in Ecology & Evolution (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/S009752/1)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NE/S010335/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
Keywords
individual recognition, social networks, social recognition, sociality, social structure, social transmission, cooperation, sensory cues, animal social behavior
MeSH terms
Ecology, Humans, Social Behavior, Social Networking

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review