Assessing the Long-term Effects of Autonomous Vehicles: A Speculative Approach
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, self-driving cars have generated significant attention and discussion. While it is recognized that a number of technical and legal issues need to be solved, widespread adoption of self-driving vehicles is increasingly considered to be inevitable. However, the long-term effects of this technology are rarely considered and seldom examined in the literature. Among these potential impacts are a number of direct and indirect, positive and negative outcomes, and the net effect in terms of societal benefit or harm is far from clear. In this paper, we identify the several of these outcomes, and we explore conditions in the broader transportation system under which self-driving vehicles may be either harmful or beneficial. We investigate how autonomous operation could affect the attractiveness of traveling by car, how this in turn could affect mode choice, and how changes in mode choice would affect the broader transportation system. The paper considers three speculative scenarios, defined primarily by different behavioral responses to the availability of autonomous driving. The scenarios build on an established system dynamics model that represents the major forces involved in transportation systems. A wide range of outcomes are considered, and potential policy interventions are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Academic literature outlining the AV-induced disruptions (both positive and negative) in cities and how policies are being introduced to promote or address various disruptive effects is fairly limited.
“However, academic literature outlining the AV induced disruptions (both positive and negative) in cities and how policies are being introduced to promote or address various disruptive effects is fairly limited”
From Understanding autonomous vehicles: A systematic literature review on capability, impact, planning and policy (2019) · cites this paper as Gruel & Stanford, 2016
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Faisal, A., Yigitcanlar, T., Kamruzzaman, M., & Currie, G. (2019) · Journal of Transport and Land Use · doi:10.5198/jtlu.2019.1405 · Cited by 427 · see citing works
“…and how policies are being introduced to promote or address various disruptive effects is fairly limited (Bagloee, Tavana, Asadi, & Oliver, 2016; Gruel & Stanford, 2016; Truong, De Gruyter, Currie, & Delbosc, 2017), despite a recent prediction suggests that by 2045, AVs would account for up to…”
BackgroundMilakis, D., Snelder, M., Arem, B. V., Wee, B. V., & Homem de Almeida Correia, G. (2017) · European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research · doi:10.18757/ejtir.2017.17.1.3180 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Papa, E., & Ferreira, A. (2018) · Urban Science · doi:10.3390/urbansci2010005 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
Automated vehicles and the city of tomorrow: A backcasting approach
González-González, E., Nogués, S., & Stead, D. (2019) · Cities · doi:10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.034 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Autonomous vehicles and future mobility solutions
Coppola, P., & Silvestri, F. (2019) · Autonomous Vehicles and Future Mobility · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-817696-2.00001-9 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Addressing EU climate targets: Reducing CO2 emissions using cooperative and automated vehicles
Pribyl, O., Blokpoel, R., & Matowicki, M. (2020) · Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment · doi:10.1016/j.trd.2020.102437 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gruel, W., & Stanford, J. M.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gruel, Wolfgang
- Venue
- Transportation Research Procedia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2016
- Volume
- 13
- Pages
- 18-29
- ISSN
- 2352-1457 (ISSN-L)
- 2352-1465
- OpenAlex
- W2420711411
- Cited by
- 166
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 4
- FWCI
- 13.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Transportation research procedia (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Transportation and Mobility Innovations
- Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Vehicles and Infrastructure
- Keywords
- autonomous vehicles, long-term effects, mode choice, speculative scenarios, behavioral responses, transport policy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review