Cited by 11Ion Transport and Channel RegulationDigestive system and related healthDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms

Regulation of nutrient and electrolyte absorption in human organoid-derived intestinal epithelial cell monolayers

Open access
Haynes, Jennifer, Palaniappan, Balasubramanian, Tsopmegha, Eliane, Sundaram, Uma·2022·Translational Research

Abstract

Recently developed human intestinal epithelial 3D organoid cultures are a useful cell culture model to study intestinal transport physiology. From these, 2D monolayer cultures can be generated in which apical transporters are exposed to the medium, thereby better facilitating in vitro investigation of intestinal absorption processes. However, whether nutrient and electrolyte absorption can be physiologically regulated in human organoid-derived monolayers has not been determined. Constitutive nitric oxide (cNO) is known to regulate multiple gastrointestinal physiological functions. Previous studies using in vivo and in vitro mammalian animal models indicate that enhanced intracellular cNO differentially regulates the two primary apical Na transporters in small intestinal epithelial cells. Here, we generated human jejunal organoid-derived monolayers to determine whether apical nutrient and electrolyte transporter function is regulated by cNO in human enterocytes. Western blot analysis and immunocytochemical staining showed that organoid-derived 2D cultures express markers of enterocyte differentiation and form intact monolayers of apical-basal polarized epithelial cells. Uptake studies demonstrated that jejunal monolayers exhibit functional activity of Na-glucose cotransporter 1 (SGLT1; SLC5A1) and Na-H exchanger 3 (NHE3; SLC9A3). In response to physiological increases in cNO, the two primary apical Na transporters were differentially regulated in human intestinal organoid-deri…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.trsl.2022.04.008

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Haynes, J., Palaniappan, B., Tsopmegha, E., & Sundaram, U.
Affiliations
Marshall University (US)
Corresponding author
Sundaram, Uma
Venue
Translational Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-10
Volume
248
Pages
22-35
ISSN
  • 1878-1810 (ISSN-L)
  • 1931-5244
OpenAlex
W4225281061
Cited by
11
References
4
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Translational research (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (DK-108054, DK-67420, P20GM121299-01A1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Digestive system and related health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Keywords
nitric oxide, intestinal nutrient absorption, electrolyte uptake, SGLT1, NHE3, enterocyte differentiation, human intestinal epithelium, in vitro intestinal model, Na+/glucose cotransport, Na+/H+ exchanger
MeSH terms
Sodium-Hydrogen Exchanger 3, Nutrients, Animals, Electrolytes, Epithelial Cells, Humans, Intestinal Mucosa, Nitric Oxide, Organoids, Sodium, Sodium-Hydrogen Exchangers, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 1

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review