Cited by 43Creativity in Education and NeuroscienceEarly Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild Development and Digital Technology

Child–father creative text-making at home with crayons, iPad collage & PC

Kucirkova, N., Sakr, M.·2015·Thinking Skills and Creativity

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2015.05.003

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kucirkova, N., & Sakr, M.
Affiliations
  • The Open University (GB)
  • Middlesex University London (GB)
Corresponding author
Kucirkova, N.
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-09
Volume
17
Pages
59-73
ISSN
1871-1871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1802724940
Cited by
43
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2
FWCI
6.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Thinking Skills and Creativity (publishedVersion)
  • Open Research Online (The Open University) (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
Keywords
children's creativity, father-child interaction, home learning environment, possibility thinking, what-if scenarios, early childhood creativity, multimodal analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review