Cited by 122Child Development and Digital TechnologyEducational Methods and ImpactsLanguage Development and Disorders

The impact of joint media engagement on parent–child interactions: A systematic review

Open access
Ewin, Carrie A., Reupert, Andrea E., McLean, Louise A., Ewin, Christopher J.·2021·Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies

Abstract

The American Academy of Paediatrics recommend that parent and children (aged 2–18 years) jointly engage in media yet the impact on interactions is unknown. This systematic review identified joint media engagement (JME) rates, the supports offered by parents and children to each other and the impact of JME on parent–child interactions. A search within six article databases (ProQuest, PsycInfo, Web of Science, Scopus, Pub Med, and CINAHL) from January 2007 to June 2019 found 7,130 results. Included papers involved parent–child dyads engaging in JME with a smartphone or tablet. In the 27 identified papers, most parents engaged in JME sometimes (41–72%) compared to JME use that was frequent (13–38%) and JME refusal (4–8%). Parents and children supported each other with cognitive, physical, technical, and affective techniques. Children were more engaged during JME activities and key elements of language quality was reduced compared to nonmobile device activities (such as toy play). The impact of JME on language quantity, warmth, scaffolding and the overall parent–child relationship was inconsistent, however, several factors that potentially influenced this impact were identified. Research investigating these factors and how apps may foster interactions is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbe2.203

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The review found that caregivers verbalize, teach, and scaffold children about the devices themselves and provide positive affective prompts during joint media engagement.

    “This review found that caregivers verbalize, teach, and scaffold children about the devices themselves and provide positive affective prompts during joint media engagement.54”
  • One systematic review of parent-child joint media engagement suggested mixed findings, likely depending on the nature of the digital media task, age of child, and comparison condition.

    “One systematic review of parent-child joint media engagement suggested mixed findings, likely depending on the nature of the digital media task, age of child, and comparison condition (eg, toys, books, TV).54”
  • Compared with nondigital devices, joint media engagement was sometimes associated with reduced caregiver language overall and occasional negative interactions for young children.

    “Compared with nondigital devices, joint media engagement was sometimes associated with reduced caregiver language overall and occasional negative interactions for young children (eg, pushing caregivers’ hands away or using tablets in more isolated ways).54”
  • Caregivers can shape the digital experiences of their children.

    “Caregivers have the power to shape their children’s digital experiences.23,54”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [14]14. Hiniker, A., Lee, B., Kientz, J. A., & Radesky, J. S. (2018). Let's play!: Digital and analog play between preschoolers and parents. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal QC, Canada.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ewin, C. A., Reupert, A. E., McLean, L. A., & Ewin, C. J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Ewin, Carrie A.
Venue
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-13
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
230-254
ISSN
2578-1863 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3042654373
Cited by
122
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 2
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Impacts
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
Keywords
joint media engagement, parent-child interaction, mobile devices, smartphones, tablets, language development, scaffolding, parent-child relationship, child engagement, parental support

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review