Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 19

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring individual and group flow in collaborative improvisational dance

Łucznik, Klara, May, Jon·2021·Thinking Skills and Creativity
DOI 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100847
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100847

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Cseh, 2016, Mental and perceptual feedback in the development of creative flow, Consciousness and Cognition, 42, 150, 10.1016/j.concog.2016.03.011 · DOI
  2. Csikszentmihalyi, 1989, Optimal experience in work and leisure, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 815, 10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.815 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Eklund, 1994, A season-long investigation of competitive cognition in collegiate wrestlers, Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 65, 169, 10.1080/02701367.1994.10607612 · doi:10.1080/02701367.1994.10607612
  4. Gläser, 2013, Life with and without coding: Two methods for early-stage data analysis in qualitative research aiming at causal explanations, Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 14
  5. Hart, 2013, Combined flow in musical jam sessions: A pilot qualitative study, Psychology of Music
  6. Hefferon, 2006, ‘Just clicks’: An interpretive phenomenological analysis of professional dancers’ experience of flow, Research in Dance Education, 7, 141, 10.1080/14647890601029527 · DOI
  7. Jackson, 1995, Factors influencing the occurrence of flow state in elite athletes, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 7, 138, 10.1080/10413209508406962 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Lipman-Blumen, 1999, Hot groups “with attitude”: A new organizational state of mind, Organizational Dynamics, 27, 63, 10.1016/S0090-2616(99)90030-X · DOI
  9. Łucznik, 2015, Between minds and bodies: Some insights about creativity from dance improvisation, Technoetic Arts, 13, 301, 10.1386/tear.13.3.301_1 · DOI
  10. Łucznik, 2017, Dance improvisational cognition, AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, VIII, 227, 10.26913/80s02017.0111.0021 · DOI
  11. Łucznik, 2020, A qualitative investigation of flow experience in group creativity, Research in Dance Education, 1
  12. MacDonald, 2006, Creativity and flow in musical composition: An empirical investigation, Psychology of Music, 34, 292, 10.1177/0305735606064838 · DOI
  13. Martin, 2002, An exploratory study of flow and motivation in theater actors, Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 14, 344, 10.1080/10413200290103608 · DOI
  14. Millard, 2015, What’s the score?: Using scores in dance improvisation, Brolga: An Australian Journal About Dance, 40, 45
  15. Myers, 2012, “Listening with the third ear” an exploration of empathy in musical performance, Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 52, 254, 10.1177/0022167811412781 · DOI
  16. Norgaard, 2011, Descriptions of improvisational thinking by artist-level jazz musicians, Journal of Research in Music Education, 59, 109, 10.1177/0022429411405669 · DOI
  17. Paskevska, 2001, On zen, flow, and being in the dance, Journal of Dance Education, 1, 102, 10.1080/15290824.2001.10387187 · doi:10.1080/15290824.2001.10387187
  18. Privette, 1983, Peak experience, peak performance, and flow: A comparative analysis of positive human experiences, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45, 1361, 10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1361 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.6.1361 · Paper page
  19. Rowe, 2009, Using video-stimulated recall as a basis for interviews: Some experiences from the field, Music Education Research, 11, 425, 10.1080/14613800903390766 · DOI
  20. Salanova, 2003, Perceived collective efficacy, subjective well-being and task performance among electronic work groups: an experimental study, Small Group Research, 34, 43, 10.1177/1046496402239577 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Salanova, 2014, Flowing together: A longitudinal study of collective efficacy and collective flow among workgroups, The Journal of Psychology, 148, 435, 10.1080/00223980.2013.806290 · DOI
  22. Sawyer, 2000, Improvisation and the creative process: Dewey, Collingwood, and the aesthetics of spontaneity, The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism, 58, 149, 10.1111/1540-6245.jaac58.2.0149 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Spreng, 2009, The Toronto empathy questionnaire: Scale development and initial validation of a factor-analytic solution to multiple empathy measures, Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 62, 10.1080/00223890802484381 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Zhang, 2016, R2MLwiN: A package to run MLwiN from within r, Journal of Statistical Software, 72, 1, 10.18637/jss.v072.i10 · DOI

Cited by

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
Łucznik, K., & May, J.
Venue
Thinking Skills and Creativity
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-06
Volume
40
Pages
100847
ISSN
1871-1871
DOI
10.1016/j.tsc.2021.100847
Cited by
19
References
4
Language
en
Licence
Funders
University of Plymouth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.